3 Amendments of Cristian Dan PREDA related to 2012/2135(INI)
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines the fact that, although there is no general definition of the term ‘biopiracy’, it usually refers to the industrial practice of privatising and patenting products based on the traditional knowledgeand stresses that further work must be carried out in order to clarify and consolidate the legal terminology in the area of intellectual property rights orn genetic resources of indigenous peoples, without authorisation or providing compensation to source countri, in particular with a view to a definition of the term 'biopiracy', based on authoritative figures;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that fighting biopiracy entails the implementation and upgrading of the existing arrangements for both bilateral and multilateral access and benefit sharing in the areas of agriculture and health, such as the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGR) or the WHO's Intergovernmental Meeting on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Points out the proposal made by developing countries for a binding regulation requiringConsiders that patent applicants toshould: (a) disclose the source and origin of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge (ATK) used in inventions; (b) provide evidence of prior informed consent (PIC) from competent authorities in the provider country and; (c) provide evidence of fair end equitable benefit sharing, to be certified in an international certificate of origin;