BETA

12 Amendments of Cristian Dan PREDA related to 2016/2067(INI)

Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the EU’s security environment has deteriorated considerably, becoming more fluidcomplex, more dangerous and less predictable; notes that threats are both conventional and hybrid, generated by both state and non-state actors, and coming from the South and the East, and that they affect the Member States differently, thus preventing a more common approachmaking the definition of a common approach more challenging;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that terrorism has brought guerrilla warfare to European streetsfrom radical Islamist organizations is targeting Europe at an unprecedented scale; underlines that, consequently, security of the individual has become paramount, eroding the traditional distinction between its external and internal dimensions; calls therefore on the EU to adapt to these security challenges, in particular by using more efficiently the existing CSDP tools in coherence with other external and internal instruments: calls for better cooperation and coordination between Member States, especially in the field of counter- terrorism;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is firmly convinced that, as a result, a thorough revision of the CSDP is needed; believes that a successful revision of CSDP will have to fully integrate EU Member States from the very beginning of the process in order to avoid risks of deadlocks in the future;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that, as Europe is no longer in control of its security environment and has lost the luxury of choosing the time and place of action, the CSDP, which has, until now, focused mainly on crisis management operations, should complement these operations with crisis prevention and crisis resolution, and truly ensure the common security and defence of the entire area of freedom, security and justice;deleted
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the future roadmap on CSDP that will be presented by the VP/HR with concrete timetable and steps; believes that this roadmap should complement the European Defence Action Plan; underlines the need to reinforce the military component of the CSDP;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Highlights the need to improve the financing tools of CSDP missions and operations and particularly the Athena mechanism;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Salutes the European Security Compact proposed by Germany and France and supports inter alia the idea of a common analysis of Europe’s strategic environment, makingthat would make threat assessment a periodical common activity, and thus getting respect for each other’s concerns and support forat would allow the building of common capabilities and common action;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that, as internal and external security are becoming more and more integrated, the integration of their respeUnderlines the importance of making full use of the Treaties and CSDP legal potential by revising EU rapid reactiveon inventories is also becoming necessary,struments and in particular the Battlegroups; empowering the EU to act along the entire spectrum of instruments, up to the level of is key ; Article 44 and Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union are useful tools as well as the structured cooperation mechanism;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Supports the idea to change CSDP institutional structure by putting the focus on a more systematic coordination between the civilian and military personnel; welcomes, in that sense, the launching of the future initiative to establish a joint civilian-military planning and conduct capability;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines that NATO is best equipped for deterrence and defence, and is ready to implement collective defence (Article V of the Washington Treaty) in the case of aggression against one of its members, while the EU is best equipped to deal with challenges to the internal security of the Member States, including subversion, which are not covered by Article V;deleted
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the recent Joint Declaration signed by the EU with NATO in Warsaw and fully supports the fields of collaboration mentioned therein and particularly hybrid threats, capabilities and research;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Recalls that a robust European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, which includes facilities for SMEs, is a fundamental underpinning of the CSDP and a prerequisite for a common market, which should supply all buyers with adequate and affordable means, responding to their individual needsthus allowing the EU to build its strategic autonomy;
2016/09/15
Committee: AFET