BETA

7 Amendments of Kerstin WESTPHAL related to 2010/2277(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s proposals aimed at deepening the single market, but regrets the absence of an ambitious consumer protection agenda and a social clause;
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that in a globalised world the single market has to ensure the best possible business environment for enterprises, and to take the specific nature of SMEs into account in order to foster job creation, innovation and entrepreneurship in all EU regions, including rural areas; welcomes, therefore, the planned assessment of the ‘Small Business Act’ and the reinforcement of the ‘Think Small First’ principle; and recalls the pivotal role Cohesion Policy can play to the further integration of the Single Market especially through the support it provides for SMEs in all EU regions;
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that single market accessibility for all EU regions is a prerequisite for the free movement of people, goods, capital and services, and thus for a strong and dynamic single market; stresses that progress with the internal market and further development of the Union’s regions are interdependent; points out, in this connection, the essential role played by the Union's regional policy in terms of developing infrastructure, particularly in the less developed and outermost regions; calls for the development of innovative sources of funding (such as public-private partnerships, project bonds and user charges); calls on the Commission and the Member States jointly to address the complexity of the rules governing revenue- generating projects;
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that regional policy implementation is crucial for the success of the Europe 2020 strategy and the deepening of the single market; points out that EU structural funding should be allocated in a dynamic, forward-looking manner, i.e. so as to cushion further the possible adverse effects on regions of international trade agreements and to prepare EU regions for socioeconomic change; calls for a more user-friendly regional policy, but also for maximum transparency and stricter rules against ‘fund-shopping’, by means of which some enterprises may misuse the Union's financial instruments;
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that regional policy implementation is crucial for the success of the Europe 2020 strategy and the deepening of the single market and calls upon the Commission to establish a real correlation between the Single Market Act and the EU2020; points out that EU structural funding should be allocated in a dynamic, forward-looking manner, i.e. so as to cushion further the possible adverse effects on regions of international trade agreements and to prepare EU regions for socioeconomic change; calls for a more user-friendly regional policy, but also for stricter rules against ‘fund-shopping’, by means of which some enterprises may misuse the Union's financial instruments;
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Asks the Commission to clarify the ‘conditionality principle’ mentioned in the debate on the future of the Union's regional policy, which, if it is not adequately implemented, could lead to the imposition of damaging and useless sanctions on potential beneficiaries under regional policy, i.e. enterprises and EU citizens;deleted
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that services are a unique source of development for the single market; emphasises that the Services Directive is an essential step towards a true single market for services, and that the transposition process should take place as quickly as possible and in a transparent manner; underlines, in particular, the need for socially and regionally equitable access to services of general interest by making full use of the possibilities provided by the Lisbon Treaty namely the Protocol No 26;
2011/02/07
Committee: REGI