11 Amendments of Knut FLECKENSTEIN related to 2010/2154(INI)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas health represents an asset to be preserved and exposure to ionising radiation from certain types of scanners, such as those emitting X-rays with cumulative effects, needs to be analysed; whereas this represents a risk that should be avoidand must not be permitted,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas cargo and mail are loaded onto passenger planes and therefore present a target for terrorist attacks, taken into account that security control for cargo and mail is much lower than for passengers, security measures must me tightened for mail and cargo which is loaded onboard of passenger planes,
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Proposes, more specifically, that the Commission should revise the rules on the use of security scanners on a regularly basis to ensure that the provisions on the protection of health and fundamental rights are adapted to technological progress;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Takes the view that exposure to doses of ionising radiation above the recommended annual limits cannot be acceptable; believes, therefore, that X-ray transmission imaging should not be used in systematic security screening;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Believes that such protection can be better achieved when a standard figure isonly stick figures should be used, and that the use ofno body images should be permitted only with the appropriate guarantees and on an exceptional basis;taken.
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that images should not be stored for longer than is necessary to ensure aviation securitystick figures must not be stored, and can only be used for the amount of time necessary for the screening process, that they shouldmust be destroyed once they are no longer necessary for the intended purposedirectly afterwards, and that they should not be used for purposes other than to detect prohibited objects;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Takes the view that the operating rules must ensure that people area random process of selection is applied and passengers must not be selected to pass through a security scanner on the basis of discriminatory criteria;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Takes the view that, wheno images are used, they should not be linked to the passenger's identity and measures should be takentaken, in order to enssecure that passengers cannot be identified with images of any part of the body unless this is necessar' identity;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Stresses that the technology used must not have the capabilities to store or save data;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Calls on the Commission to grant, that staff working with the technology of security scanners must not be allowed to have any devices capable of capturing images during working shifts;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Urges the Council to immediately adopt a position on aviation security charges at first reading as soon as possible, due to the fact that legislation on aviation security and legislation on aviation security charges are intertwined;