Activities of Marco SCURRIA related to 2010/0044(COD)
Plenary speeches (3)
European Heritage Label (debate)
European Heritage Label (debate)
European Heritage Label (debate)
Amendments (4)
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 2
Article 2
For the purposes of this Decision, ‘sites’ shall mean monuments, natural or urban sites, cultural landscapes, places of remembrance, cultural goods and objects, cultural routes and intangible heritage attached to a place, including contemporary heritage.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point 1 – indent 2
Article 7 – point 1 – indent 2
and/or the place and role of a site in European history and European integration, and its links with key European events or personalities, as well as with cultural, artistic, political, social, scientific, technological, environmental or industrial movements;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. In the event that the panel of experts decides that neither of the two sites proposed by a Member State are eligible, the possibility will be assessed of awarding the label to one of the second sites proposed by the other Member States. However, no more than twenty-seven sites may be proposed for the European label each year.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The attribution of the European label shall not entail any obligation of an urban planning, judicial, landscaping, mobility or architectural nature. The sole law applicable shall be the local law.