BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

Activities of Thomas HÄNDEL related to 2012/2292(INI)

Plenary speeches (2)

Cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)
Cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue (A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel) (vote)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)

Reports (1)

REPORT on cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue PDF (198 KB) DOC (105 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(105 KB)

Amendments (13)

Amendment 6 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
Commission's Expert Group on transnational company agreements, 31 January 2012,
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Document of the Commission's Expert Group on transnational company agreements, 31 January 2012,
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
transnational company agreements has increased significantly and whereas this indicates that labour relations in Europe are becoming increasingly integrated;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas each EU Member State has its own system of relations between social partnerindustrial relations, based on different historical developments and traditions, which has to be respected and does not require harmonisation;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
with European transnational company agreements concluded by European trade union federations and European employers or employers’ federations, generally at sectoral level, and that the resolution does not concern international transnational company agreements (ITCA) signed by international trade union federations with undertakings;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
optional European legal framework should be adopted for these European transnational company agreements;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
transnational company agreements
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
their basis an optional European legal framework in order, even before negotiations at European level, to eliminate certain potential problems at source and in order to have their attention drawn to regulatory solutions which have proved useful and effective;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
optional legal framework should be optional for the social partners;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
trade union federations to negotiate and conclude only European transnational company agreements; observes that, if a European trade union federation has not agreed any internal procedure for issuing a negotiating mandate, agreements may only be concluded by representative national trade unions; considers that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
favourable clause and the non-regression clause in order to avert the danger that a European transnational company agreement might result in evasion of national collective agreements and national company agreements, or impair them;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
dispute settlement procedures; considers that, in European transnational company agreements, a first ad hoc contact point at undertaking level should be agreed in order to bring about solutions to conflicts between the contracting parties;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #
Thomas HÄNDEL
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
fundamental criteria for European transnational company agreements which the negotiating parties should discuss and whose outcome they should record in writing in order to prevent problems of subsequent interpretation and application; notes that the following points, in particular, should be covered: the mandating procedure, i.e. clarification of the legitimacy and representativeness of the negotiating parties between which agreements are concluded, the place and date of conclusion of an agreement, substantive and geographical scope, the most favourable clause and the non- regression clause, the period of validity, the preconditions for denouncing the agreement and the dispute settlement procedures;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation