BETA

Activities of Sabine LÖSING related to 2011/0401(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and innovation (2014-2020)
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2011/0401(COD)
Documents: PDF(245 KB) DOC(526 KB)

Amendments (11)

Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. For the implementation of Horizon 2020, account shall be taken of advice and inputs provided by: advisory groups of independent, high level experts set up by the Commission; at most 10 percent of such groups shall consist of representatives of the industry sectors most likely to benefit from the programme; they must include a substantial amount of representatives from civil society as well as data protection authorities and fundamental rights bodies; dialogue structures created under international science and technology agreements; forward looking activities; targeted public consultations; and transparent and interactive processes that ensure responsible research and innovation is supported.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Research and innovation activities carried out under Horizon 2020 shall have an exclusive focus on civil applications. This explicitly excludes any funding for programmes which fall into the realm of defence policies; civilian and defence policies and research have to be strictly separated with the latter being unable to obtain funding from the Union's research programme. Furthermore the problem of dual use shall be addressed in a way as to ensure that no civilian technologies funded under the programmes shall be used for military purposes.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 1 – point 1.6 – point 1.6.1 – paragraph 1
The specific objective of civilian space research and innovation is to foster a competitive and innovative civilian space industry and research community to develop and exploit space infrastructure to meet future Union policy and societal needs. All research shall be restricted purely to civilian activities and every step in the direction of a militarization of space shall be strictly avoided.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 1 – point 1.6 – point 1.6.2 – paragraph 2
Research, technology development and innovation underpin capacities in space which are vital to European society. While the United States of America spends around 25 % of their space budget on R&D, the Union spends less than 10 %. Moreover, space research in the Union is fragmented in the national programmes of a few Member States. To maintain the technological and competitive edge Union level action is needed to coordinate space research, to promote the participation of researchers from all Member States, and to lower the barriers for collaborative space research projects across national borders. This needs to be done in coordination with the European Space Agency, which has successfully managed industrial satellite development and deep space missions on an intergovernmental basis with a subset of the Member States since 1975. In addition, the information provided by European satellites will offer an increasing potential for further development of innovative satellite-based downstream services. This is a typical activity sector for SMEs and should be supported by research and innovation measures in order to reap the full benefits of this opportunity, and especially of the considerable investments made on the two Union flagships Galileo and GMES.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 1 – point 1.6 – point 1.6.2 – paragraph 4
Space research and innovation under Horizon 2020 aligns with the Union space policy priorities as they continue to be definlong as they are restricted byto the Union Space Councils and the European Commissexclusive focus on civil application s.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6 – point 6.1 – paragraph 5
Third, many forms of insecurity, whether crime, violence, terrorism, cyber attacks, privacy abusesEurope has never been so peacefully consolidated and other forms of social and economic disorders increasingly affect citizens. According to estimates, there is likely to be up to 75 million direct victims of crime e levels of security enjoyed by European citizens are considerably high compared to past decades and other parts of the world. In light of this relativerly year in Europe . The direct cost of crime, terrorism, illegal activities, violebenign environment, all activities shall be balanced and disasters in Europe has been estimated at at least EUR 650 billion (about 5 % of the Union's GDP) in 2010. A vivid example of the consequences of terrorism is the attack against the Twin Towers in Manhattan on 11 September 2001. Thousands of lives were lost and it is estimated that this event caused losses in US productivity amounting to US$ 35 billion, US$ 47 billion in total output and a rise in unemployment by almost 1 % in the following quarter. Citizens, firms proportionate. Therefore, all Calls for Proposals in the security research field shall first be subject to an ethical review that shall pay full regard to their societal impacts with regards to civil liberties and fundamental human rights. Notwithstand institutiong this are increasingly involved in digital interactions and transactions in social, financial and commercial areas of life but the development of Internet has also led to cyber crime worth billion of Euros each year and breaches of privacy affecting individual or asslatively benign environment, insecurity (at home and abroad) still exists. To tackle these challenges the Union shall focus on the root causes of insecurity, especially how to fight poverty and inequality. Therefore a majority of the funding allociations across the continent. The development of insecurity in everyday lifed under the heading inclusive, innovative and bsecause of unexpected situations is likely to affect the citizens' trust not only in institutions but also in ure societies shall be earmarked for social sciences and humanities research other.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6 – point 6.2 – paragraph 3
Fostering new modes of cooperation between countries within the Union and worldwide, as well as across relevant research and innovation communities, will therefore be a central task under this challenge. Engaging citizens and industry, supporting social and technological innovation processes, encouraging smart and participatory public administration, as well as promoting evidence based policymaking will be systematically pursued in order to enhance the relevance of all these activities for policymakers, social and economic actors and citizens. In this regard, research and innovation will be a precondition for the competitiveness of European industries and services, in particular in the areas of security, digital development and privacy protection. The Union shall ensure that technologies that have been supported by the EU security research programme do not end-up in the hands of other governments, especially not ones with poor human rights records. There shall be a strict review of the societal impacts of the export of security technologies to other countries.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6 – point 6.2 – paragraph 4
Union funding under this challenge will thus support the development, implementation and adaptation of key Union policies, notably Europe 2020 priorities for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Union's Internal Security Strategy, including policies on disaster prevention and response. Coordination with the Joint Research Centre direct actions will be pursued as long as they are restricted to civilian purposes and they are strictly separated from military activities.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) fight crime and terrorism by focusing on the root causes why people become radicalized into violence and on effective social policies to counter these reasons;
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) strengthen security through border managementimprove the Union's border management by testing the compliance of technologies and capabilities for border management with fundamental human rights principles;
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) ensure privacy and freedom in the Internet and enhance the societal dimension of securincrease the security and liberty of the people by focusing on measures to restore civil liberties, preserve fundamental rights and enhance accountability.
2012/08/30
Committee: AFET