Activities of Sabine LÖSING related to 2017/2121(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) – opening a new chapter in European Security and Defence Policy (debate) DE
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the Annual Report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy PDF (356 KB) DOC (73 KB)
Amendments (12)
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 1 a (new)
Paragraph 3 – indent 1 a (new)
– a purely peaceful and civil approach of the CFSP-Policy that is non- discriminatory and in line with international law, which should be focused on civil measures only, stability and human rights, civil conflict resolution and prevention, disarmament, non - proliferation of nuclear weapons, DDR and mediation,
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 2 a (new)
Paragraph 3 – indent 2 a (new)
– poverty eradication, social security, humanitarian aid, sustainable economic and social development, including favouring balanced economic relations, fair trade and fair distribution of wealth and resources in the EU’s neighbourhood and the rest of the world,
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China;purely peaceful and civil approach can confront these challenges, takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance, arm exports, unfair trade agreements and climate change;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recalls that the EU is among the biggest arms-exporters in the world and closed down all legal and save ways for migration and refugees and recently conditioned its development aid upon holding and taking back refugees and migrants;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Rejects every proposal which refocuses development policy, in particular in Africa, under the new prism of migration management; stresses that there should be no conditionality between development assistance and cooperation from beneficiary countries on migration issues; opposes any attempts to link aid with border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements; recalls in this regard the strengthening and improving of public local services (e.g. health, education, nutrition) and political participation, and that third countries' governments, together with civil society, local and international NGOs, should play a pivotal role;
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Rejects the militarisation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CSFP) in general, the Global Strategy's Implementation Plan on Security and Defence as well as the European Defence Fund and PESCO; recalls in this regard that Article41(2) of the TEU prohibits operating expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications to be charged to the Union budget;
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls forRejects the increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner; acknowledgedemands to end EU-NATO cooperation; calls for the entire demilitarisation of the EU and therefore strictly rejects thate information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cybersecurity and capacity building vis-à- vis the EU’s partners; believes that further coordination and closer cooperation with other existing multilateral entities such as Eurocorps is needed in order to increase the EU’s security;