Activities of Cătălin Sorin IVAN related to 2010/0044(COD)
Plenary speeches (2)
European Heritage Label (debate)
European Heritage Label (debate)
Amendments (6)
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 4
Article 4
The action shall be open to the participation of the Member States of the European Union. This participation shall be on a voluntary basis, with the possibility of extending the initiative to third countries participating in the Culture Programme.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point 1 – indent 1
Article 7 – point 1 – indent 1
– their cross-border or pan-European nature: the past and/or present influence and the present attraction of a candidate site must go beyond the national borders of a Member State;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point 3 – indent 4
Article 7 – point 3 – indent 4
– ensuring access for the widest possible public, for example through site adaptations or staff training, including for elderly persons and people with disabilities;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. If a conflict of interest, or a dispute the nature of which is to be precisely defined and agreed on before the start of the selection procedure, between a member of the panel and a specific site comes to light, the member of the panel shall not take part in the evaluation of the said site.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The pre-selection of the sites for the attribution of the European Heritage Label shall be under the responsibility of the Member States, in close cooperation with local and regional authorities.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– One specific site which is geographically situated on the territory of at least two different Member States or on the territory of a Member State and an adjacent State participating in the Culture Programme.