2 Amendments of Marie-Christine VERGIAT related to 2009/2127(DEC)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned that even though the Court of Auditors considered the transactions underlying the College's annual accounts to be legal and regular, it also highlighted the following exceptions which should be duly noted: an irregular procurement procedure (the College directly contracted consulting services with a provider on the basis of a Commission framework contract exclusively intended for training services, the value of the contract being of EUR 96 000); a high number of breaches of the applicable administrative and financial rules as regards the expenditure for the organisation of courses and seminars and a series of commitments for which the legal commitments were lacking or the absence of budgetary commitments before the legal commitments; takes due account of the College's replies concerning these issues but deplores the fact that its replies do not adequately identify the specific measures taken and applied for the speedy resolution of the problems;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets that, as the Court points out in its comments, an ex post control by an external company was not launched even mid 2009 (following the Court's findings in the 2007 financial year report that there were cases of appropriations which were used to finance private expenditure); calls on the College to take all the steps needed to ensure that such a control is carried out as speedily as possible so that this shortcoming will not feature again in the report on the College's annual accounts for 2009;