BETA

Activities of Marie-Christine VERGIAT related to 2011/0023(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

Use of Passenger Name Record data (EU PNR) (A8-0248/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0023(COD)
Use of Passenger Name Record data (EU PNR) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0023(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of Passenger Name Record data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2011/0023(COD)
Documents: PDF(248 KB) DOC(920 KB)

Amendments (87)

Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of Passenger Name Record data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive
Citation 3 a (new)
Having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 April 2014 in joined cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 concerning Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC,
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) PNR data are necessary to effectively prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime and thus enhance internal security.deleted
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal;
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) PNR data may, in exceptional circumstances and within the framework laid down in the Court of Justice’s judgment of 8 April 2014, help law enforcement authorities prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute serious transnational crimes, including acts of terrorism, by comparing them with various databases of persons and objects sought, to construct evidence and, where relevant, to find associates of criminals and unravel criminal networks.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) PNR data may enable law enforcement authorities to identify persons who were previously ‘unknown’, i.e. persons previously unsuspected of involvement in serious transnational crime and terrorism, but whom an analysis of the data suggests may be involved in such crime and who should therefore be subject to further examination by the competent authorities. Given that this concerns persons who had previously not even been suspected, those persons should only be subject to further examination by the competent authorities in cases linked to serious transnational crime or acts of terrorism. By using PNR data, law enforcement authorities can address the threat of serious transnational crime and terrorism from a different perspective than through the processing of other categories of personal data. However, in order to ensure that the processing of data of innocent and unsuspected persons remains as limited as possible, the aspects of the use of PNR data relating to the creation and application of assessment criteria should be further limited to serious crimes that are also transnational in nature, i.e. are intrinsically linked to travelling and hence the type of the data being processed.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The processing of personal data must be proportionate to, and necessary in order to attain, the specific security goal pursued by this Directive, in accordance with the principles of necessity and proportionality referred to by the Court of Justice in its judgment of 4 April 2014, and by the European Data Protection Supervisor in his opinion of 25 March 2011.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The use of PNR data together with Advance Passenger Information data in certain cases has added value in assisting Member States in verifying the identity of an individual and thus reinforcing their law enforcement value.deleted
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set outRejects the Commission proposal;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) PNR data are necessary to effectively prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime and thus enhance internal security.deleted
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) To prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious transnational crime, it is therefore essential that all Member States introduce provisions laying down obligations on air carriers operating international flights to or from the territory of the Member States of the European Union.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The definition of terrorist offences should be taken from Articles 1 to 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism37. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States38 and the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. However, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organised Crime. __________________ 37 OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3. Decision as amended by Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 (OJ L 330, 9.1.2.2008, p. 21). 38 OJ L 190, 18.07.2002, p. 1.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The contents of any lists of required PNR data to be obtained by the Passenger Information Unit should be drawn up with the objective of reflecting the legitimate requirements of public authorities to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences or serious transnational crime, thereby improving internal security within the Union as well as protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, notably privacy and the protection of personal data. Such lists should not contain any personal data, and in particular data that could reveal the sex, racial or, ethnic origin social origin, genetic features, language, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, membership of political or other associations, trade union membership, or data concerning health or sexual lifethe dietary habits, health, disability or sexual orientation of the individual concerned. The PNR data should contain details on the passenger’s reservation and travel itinerary which enable competent authorities to identify air passengers representing a threat to internal security.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) PNR data may in exceptional circumstances help law enforcement authorities prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute serious transnational crimes, including acts of terrorism, by comparing them with various databases of persons and objects sought, to construct evidence and, where relevant, to find associates of criminals and unravel criminal networks.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Each Member State should be responsible for assessing the potential threats related to terrorist offences and serious transnational crime.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Taking fully into consideration the right to the protection of personal data and the right to non-discrimination, no decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person or seriously affects him/her should be taken only by reason of the automated processing of PNR data. Moreover, no such decision should be taken by reason of a person’s race or ethnic origin, processing against predetermined criteria or any other form of profiling. Moreover, no such decision should be taken by reason of a person’s sex, racial, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, political opinmembership of political or other associations, trade union membership, health or sexual lifedietary habits, health, disability or sexual orientation.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) PNR data may enable law enforcement authorities to identify persons who were previously ‘unknown’, i.e. persons previously unsuspected of involvement in serious transnational crime and terrorism, but whom an analysis of the data suggests may be involved in such crime and who. Since that suggestion does not amount to suspicion, those persons should therefore be subject to further examination by the competent authorities only in cases related to specific acts of serious crime or terrorism. By using PNR data law enforcement authorities can address the threat of serious transnational crime and terrorism from a different perspective than through the processing of other categories of personal data. However, in order to ensure that the processing of data of innocent and unsuspected persons remains as limited as possible, the aspects of the use of PNR data relating to the creation and application of assessment criteriause of PNR should be further limited to serious crimes that are also transnational in nature, i.e. are intrinsically linked to travelling and hence the type of the data being processed.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should share with other Member States the PNR data that they receive where such transfer is necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious transnational crime. The provisions of this Directive should be without prejudice to other Union instruments on the exchange of information between police and judicial authorities, including Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)39 and Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 SeptDecember 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union40. Such exchange of PNR data between law enforcement and judicial authorities should be governed by the rules on police and judicial cooperation. __________________ 39 4039 OJ L 121, 15.05.09, p. 37. OJ L 121, 15.05.2009, p. 37. 40 OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89. OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The period during which PNR data are to be retained should be proportionate to the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime. Because of the nature of the data and their uses, it is necessary that the PNR data are retained for a sufficiently long period for carrying out analysis and for use in investigationstransnational crime. In order to avoid disproportionate use, it is necessary that, after an initial period, the data are permanently anonymised and only accessible under very strict and limited conditions.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The use of PNR data together with Advance Passenger Information data in certain cases has added value in assisting Member States in verifying the identity of an individual and thus reinforcing their law enforcement value.deleted
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) This Directive does not affect the possibility for Member States to provide, under their domestic law, for a system of collection and handling of PNR data for purposes other than those specified in this Directive, or from transportation providers other than those specified in the Directive, regarding internal flights subject to compliance with relevant data protection provisions, provided that such domestic law respects the Union acquis. The issue of the collection of PNR data on internal flights should be the subject of specific reflection at a future date.deleted
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) To prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious transnational crime, it is therefore essential that all Member States introduce provisions laying down obligations on air carriers operating international flights to or from the territory of the Member States of the European Union.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) Member State legislation in this area must comply with the EU acquis and with the conventions and texts of the Council of Europe.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) As a result of the legal and technical differences between national provisions concerning the processing of personal data, including PNR, air carriers are and will be faced with different requirements regarding the types of information to be transmitted, as well as the conditions under which this information needs tomay be provided to competent national authorities. These differences may be prejudicial to so as to ensure effective cooperation between the competent national authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime, whilst ensuring compliance with the EU acquis and with the conventions and texts of the Council of Europe in this area.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) As a result of the legal and technical differences between national provisions concerning the processing of personal data, including PNR, air carriers are and will be faced with different requirements regarding the types of information to be transmitted, as well as the conditions under which this information needs to be provided to competent national authorities. These differences may be prejudicial to effective cooperation between the competent national authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences or serious transnational crime.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive provides for the transfer by air carriers of Passenger Name Record data of passengers of targeted international flights to and from the Member States, as well as the processing of that data, including its collection, use and retention by the Member States and its exchange between them, whilst taking into account the principles of proportionality and necessity as regards the goals pursued.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The definition of terrorist offences should be taken from Articles 1 to 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States and the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organized Crime. However, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organised Crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘targeted international flight’ means any scheduled or non-scheduled flight, identified by the competent national authorities as a flight that might be used by passengers involved in terrorist offences or serious transnational crime, by an air carrier planned to land on the territory of a Member State originating in a third country or to depart from the territory of a Member State with a final destination in a third country, including in both cases any transfer orexcept transit flights;
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The contents of any lists of required PNR data to be obtained by the Passenger Information Unit should be drawn up with the objective of reflecting the legitimate requirements of public authorities to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences or serious transnational crime, thereby improving internal security within the Union as well as protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, notably privacy and the protection of personal data. Such lists should not contain any personal data, and in particular any data that could reveal sex, racial or, ethnic origin social origin, genetic features, language, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership or data concerning health or sexual life of the individual concerned. The PNR data should contain details on the passenger's reservation and travel itinerary which enable competent authorities to identify air passengers representing a threat to internal security.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – introductory part
(i) ‘serious transnational crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least threfive years under the national law of a Member State, and if : ; however, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice systems, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this Directive would not be in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity, in particular, and if:
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) ‘profiling’ means the process of discovering patterns from a data set by automated or semi-automated means in order to detect anomalies in the given data set;
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i b (new)
(ib) ‘sensitive data’ means personal data revealing the sex, racial, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, membership of political or other associations, trade union membership, dietary habits, health, disability or sexual orientation of an individual in accordance with Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as other data identified as sensitive under national legislation;
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) There are two possible methods of data transfer currently available: the ‘pull’ method, under which the competent authorities of the Member State requiring the data can reach into (access) the air carrier's reservation system and extract (‘pull’) a copy of the required data, and the ‘push’ method, under which air carriers transfer (‘push’) the required PNR data to the authority requesting them, thus allowing air carriers to retain control of what data is provided. The ‘push’ method is considered to offer a higher degree of data protection and should be mandatory for all air carriers. The 'pull' method should be prohibited under this Directive.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The collection of sensitive data and the profiling of PNR data are prohibited under this Directive.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. In carrying out such an assessment, the Passenger Information Unit may only process PNR data against pre-determined criteria in exceptional circumstances. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action and whether such action is proportionate to the objective;
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the carrying out an, by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5, of a thorough assessment of the risk posed by passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5f there are factual grounds for suspecting that they are likely to be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime. In carrying out such an assessment the Passenger Information Unit may compare PNR data against relevant databases, including international or national databases or national mirrors of Union databases, where they are established on the basis of Union law, on persons or objects sought or under alert, in accordance with Union, international and national rules applicable to such files. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action gender identity, race, ethnic origin, social status, genetic characteristics, language, religious or philosophical beliefs, membership of a political organisation, trade union or other association, dietary practices, health, disability or sexual orientation;
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) analysing PNR data for the purpose of updating or creating new criteria for carrying out assessments in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime pursuant to point (a).deleted
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Each Member State should be responsible for assessing the potential threats related to terrorist offences and serious transnational crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Taking fully into consideration the right to the protection of personal data and the right to non-discrimination, no decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person or seriously affects him/her should be taken only by reason of the the basis of automated processing of PNR data, processing against predetermined criteria or any other form of profiling. Moreover, no such decision should be taken by reason of a person's sex, race or, ethnic origin social origin, genetic features, language, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authorities shall not take any decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person or significantly affects a person only by reason of the automated processing of PNR data, processing on the basis of pre-established criteria or any other form of profiling. Such decisions shall not be taken on the basis of a person’sgender identity, race or, ethnic origin, social status, genetic characteristics, language, political, religious or philosophical belief, membership of a political opinrganisation, trade union membership, health or sexual lifeor other association, dietary practices, health, disability or sexual orientation, in accordance with Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that air carriers transfer ('push') the PNR data as defined in Article 2(c) and specified in the Annex, to the extent that such data are already collected by them as part of their normal activity, to the database of the national Passenger Information Unit of the Member State on the territory of which the international flight will land or from the territory of which the flight will depart. Where the flight is code-shared between one or more air carriers, the obligation to transfer the PNR data of all passengers on the flight shall be on the air carrier that operates the flight. Where the flight has one or more stop-overs at the airports of the Member States, air carriers shall only transfer the PNR data to the Passenger Information Units of all the Member States concernthe Member State which is the final destination. No data which reveals a person’s gender identity, race, ethnic origin, social status, genetic characteristics, language, political, religious or philosophical beliefs, membership of a political organisation, trade union or other association, dietary practices, health, disability or sexual orientation may be transferred.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should share with other Member States the PNR data that they receive where such transfer is necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious transnational crime. The provisions of this Directive should be without prejudice to other Union instruments on the exchange of information between police and judicial authorities, including Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) and Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 September 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union. Such exchange of PNR data between law enforcement and judicial authorities should be governed by the rules on police and judicial cooperation.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Air carriers shall transfer the PNR data of the targeted international flights by electronic means using the common protocols and supported data formats to be adopted in accordance with the procedure of Articles 13 and 14 or, in the event of technical failure, by any other appropriate means ensuring an appropriate level of data security:
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The period during which PNR data are to be retained should be proportionate to the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime. Because of the nature of the data and their uses, it is necessary that the PNR data are retained for a sufficiently long period for carrying out analysis and for use in investigationstransnational crime. In order to avoid disproportionate use, it is necessary that, after an initial period, the data are permanently anonymised and only accessible under very strict and limited conditions.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Member States mayshall permit air carriers to limit the transfer referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 to updates of the transfer referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. On a case-by-case basis, uponin response to a duly justified request from a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with national lawthe competent Member State authorities and with due justification, in accordance with national law and on the basis of prior judicial authorisation, air carriers shall transfer specific, relevant PNR data where access earlier than that mentioned in point (a) of paragraph 2 is necessary to assist in responding to a specific and, actual and imminent threat related to terrorist offences or serious transnational crime.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, with regard to persons identified by a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with Article 4(2)(a) and (b), the result of the processing of PNR data is transmitted by that Passenger Information Unit to the Passenger Information Units of other Member States where the former Passenger Information Unit considers such transfer to be necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crimetransnational crime. Such transfers shall be strictly limited to the data necessary in each case for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime. Written reasons shall be given for each request. The Passenger Information Units of the receiving Member States shall transmit such PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data to their relevant competent authorities.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter’s database in accordance with Article 9(1), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The request for such data shall be strictly limited to the data necessary in each case. It may be based on any one or a combination of data elements, as deemed necessary by the requesting Passenger Information Unit for a specific case of prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crimetransnational crime. Written reasons shall be given for each request. Passenger Information Units shall provide the requested data as soon as practicable and shall provide also the result of the processing of PNR data, if it has already been prepared pursuant to Article 4(2)(a) and (b).
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter’s database in accordance with Article 9(2), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The Passenger Information Unit may request access to specific PNR data kept by the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State in their full form without the masking out only in exceptional circumstances in response to a specific threat or a specific investigation or prosecution related to terrorist offences or serious crimetransnational crime. Written reasons shall be given for each request.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Only in those cases where it is necessary for the prevention of an immediateinent, actual and serious threat toattack on public security may the competent authorities of a Member State request directly the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter’s 's database in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2). Such requests shall relate to a specific investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious transnational crime and shall be reasonduly justified. Passenger Information Units shall respond to such requests as a matter of priority. In all other cases the competent authorities shall channel their requests through the Passenger Information Unit of their own Member State.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Exceptionally, where early access is necessary to respond to a specific and, actual and imminent threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime, the Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State to provide it with PNR data of flights landing in or departing from the latter’s territory at any time. Such requests shall be strictly limited to the data necessary in each case for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime. Written reasons shall be given for each request.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
A Member State may only transfer PNR data and the results of the processing of PNR data to a third country, only on the basis of an international agreement between the Union and the third country in question, in a manner compatible with the values and principles of human rights and data protection, on condition that the data transfer relates to a serious, actual and imminent threat, on a case-by- case basis duly justified in writing and if:
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) This Directive does not affect the possibility for Member States to provide, under their domestic law, for a system of collection and handling of PNR data for purposes other than those specified in this Directive, or from transportation providers other than those specified in the Directive, regarding internal flights subject to compliance with relevant data protection provisions, provided that such domestic law respects the Union acquis. The issue of the collection of PNR data on internal flights should be the subject of specific reflection at a future date.deleted
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the transfer is necessary for and proportionate to the purposes of this Directive specified in Article 1(2), and
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
ba) the transfer is subject to prior judicial authorisation, and if
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
bb) all guarantees of procedural rights are real, effective and easily implemented, in particular the right to access, erase or rectify personal data.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) the third country agrees to transfer the data to another third country only where it is necessary for the purposes of this Directive specified in Article 1(2) and only with the express authorisation of the Member State.deleted
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) As a result of the legal and technical differences between national provisions concerning the processing of personal data, including PNR, air carriers are and will be faced with different requirements regarding the types of information to be transmitted, as well as the conditions under which this information needs to be provided to competent national authorities. These differences may be prejudicial to effective cooperation between the competent national authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences or serious transnational crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the PNR data provided by the air carriers to the Passenger Information Unit are retained in a database at the Passenger Information Unit for a period of 30three days after their transfer to the Passenger Information Unit of the first Member State on whose territory the international flight is landing or departing.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Upon expiry of the period of 30three days after the transfer of the PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit referred to in paragraph 1, the data shall be retained at the Passenger Information Unit for a further period of five years. During this periodonly if it has been proved that this is necessary to carry out an investigation and in response to a specific and actual threat or risk or a specific investigation or prosecution. During this period, which shall not exceed the length of time needed to carry out the investigation, all data elements which could serve to identify the passenger to whom PNR data relate shall be masked out. Such anonymised PNR data shall be accessible only to a limited number of personnel of the Passenger Information Unit specifically authorised to carry out analysis of PNR data and develop assessment criteria according to Article 4(2)(d). Access to the full PNR data shall be permitted only by the Head of the Passenger Information Unit for the purposes of Article 4(2)(c) and where it could be reasonably believed that it is necessary to carry out an investigation and in response to a specific and actual threat or risk or a specific investigation or prosecution.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive provides for the transfer by air carriers of Passenger Name Record data of passengers of targeted international flights to and from the Member States, as well as the processing of that data, including its collection, use and retention by the Member States and its exchange between them.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The transfer by air carriers of Passenger Name Record data of passengers on domestic flights to and from the Member States, as well as the processing of those data, including their collection, use and retention by the Member States and its exchange between them shall be prohibited under this Directive.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime according to Article 4(2)(b) and (c); andeleted
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that air carriers, their agents or other ticket sellers for the carriage of passengers on air service inform passengers of international flights at the time of booking a flight and at the time of purchase of a ticket in a clear and precise manner about the provision of PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit, the purposes of their processing, the period of data retention, their possible use to prevent, detect, investigate or prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime, the possibility of exchanging and sharing such data and their data protection rights, in particular the right to complain to a national data protection supervisory authority of their choice. The same information shall be made available by the Member States to the public.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime according to Article 4(2)(a) and (d).
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) review the feasibility and necessity of including internal flights in the scope of this Directive, in the light of the experience gained by those Member States that collect PNR data with regard to internal flights. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council within two years after the date mentioned in Article 15(1);deleted
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) 'domestic flight' means any scheduled or non-scheduled flight by an air carrier due to land on the territory of a Member State originating in any other Member State with a final destination in a Member State;
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) 'targeted flight' means any international flight that has been identified by competent national authorities, as likely to be used by passengers who are involved in terrorist offences or serious transnational crime;
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) undertake a review of the operation of this Directive and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council within fourtwo years after the date mentioned in Article 15(1). Such review shall cover all the elements of this Directive, with special attention to the compliance with the high standard of protection of personal data, including the principles of proportionality and necessity, and with the length of the data retention period and the quality of the assessments. It shall also contain the statistical information gathered pursuant to Article 18.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare a set of statistical information on PNR data provided to the Passenger Information Units. Such statistics shall as a minimum cover the number of identifications of any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime according to Article 4(2) and the number of subsequent law enforcement actions that were taken involving the use of PNR data per air carrier and destination.
2015/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘serious crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, however, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality;deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) 'profiling' means the process of discovering patterns from a data set by automated or semi-automated means in order to detect anomalies in the given data set.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Profiling of PNR data shall be prohibited under this Directive.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. In carrying out such an assessment, the Passenger Information Unit may not process PNR data against pre-determined criteria. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from suchany automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action;
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. In carrying out such an assessment the Passenger Information Unit may compare PNR data against relevant databases, including international or national databases or national mirrors of Union databases, where they are established on the basis of Union law, on persons or objects sought or under alert, in accordance with Union, international and national rules applicable to such files. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action;deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) analysing PNR data for the purpose of updating or creating new criteria for carrying out assessments in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime pursuant to point (a).deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authorities shall not take any decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person or significantly affects a person only by reason of the automated processing of PNR data, processing against predetermined criteria or any other form of profiling. Such decisions shall not be taken on the basis of a person's race or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that air carriers transfer (‘push’) the PNR data as defined in Article 2(c) and specified in the Annex, to the extent that such data are already collected by them, to the database of the national Passenger Information Unit of the Member State on the territory of which the international flight will land or from the territory of which the flight will depart. Where the flight is code-shared between one or more air carriers, the obligation to transfer the PNR data of all passengers on the flight shall be on the air carrier that operates the flight. Where the flight has one or more stop-overs at the airports of the Member States, air carriers shall transfer the PNR data to the Passenger Information Units of all the Member States concerned. No data revealing a person's sex, age, race, social or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life may be transferred.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the third country agrees not to transfer the data to another third country only where it is necessary for the purposes of this Directive specified in Article 1(2) and only with the express authorisation of the Member State.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the PNR data provided by the air carriers to the Passenger Information Unit are retained in a database at the Passenger Information Unit for a period of 30 days after their transfer to the Passenger Information Unit of the first Member State on whose territory the international flight is landing or departing.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Upon expiry of the period of 30three days after the transfer of the PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit referred to in paragraph 1, the data shall only be retained at the Passenger Information Unit for a further period of five years. During this periodif it could reasonably be believed that it is necessary to carry out an investigation and in response to a specific and actual threat or risk or a specific investigation or prosecution. During this period, which shall not exceed the time needed to carry out that investigation, all data elements which could serve to identify the passenger to whom PNR data relate shall be masked out. Such anonymised PNR data shall be accessible only to a limited number of personnel of the Passenger Information Unit specifically authorised to carry out analysis of PNR data and develop assessment criteria according to Article 4(2)(d). Access to the full PNR data shall be permitted only by the Head of the Passenger Information Unit for the purposes of Article 4(2)(c) and where it could be reasonably believed that it is necessary to carry out an investigation and in response to a specific and actual threat or risk or a specific investigation or prosecution.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the PNR data are permanently deleted upon expiry of the period specified in paragraph 2. This obligation shall be without prejudice to cases where specific PNR data have been transferred to a competent authority and are used in the context of specific criminal investigations or prosecutions, in which case the retention of such data by the competent authority shall be regulated by the national law of the Member State.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The result of matching referred to in Article 4(2)(a) and (b) shall be kept by the Passenger Information Unit only as long as necessary to inform the competent authorities of a positive match. Where the result of an automated matching operation has, further to individual review by non- automated means, proven to be negative, it shall, however, be stored so as to avoid future ‘false’ positive matches for a maximum period of three years unless the underlying data have not yet been deleted in accordance with paragraph 3 at the expiry of the five years, in which case the log shall be kept until the underlying data are deleted.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall provide that, in respect of all processing of personal data pursuant to this Directive, every passenger shall have the same right to access, the right to rectification, erasure and blocking, the right to compensation and the right to judicial redress as those adopted under national law in implementation of Articles 17(1), 18, 19 and 20 of the Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. The provisions of Articles 17(1), 18, 19 and 20 of the Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA shall therefore be applicable.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that air carriers, their agents or other ticket sellers for the carriage of passengers on air service inform passengers of international flights at the time of booking a flight and at the time of purchase of a ticket in a clear and precise manner about the provision of PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit, the purposes of their processing, the period of data retention, their possible use to prevent, detect, investigate or prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime, the possibility of exchanging and sharing such data and their data protection rights, in particular the right to complain to a national data protection supervisory authority of their choice. The same information shall be made available by the Member States to the public.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) review the feasibility and necessity of including internal flights in the scope of this Directive, in the light of the experience gained by those Member States that collect PNR data with regard to internal flights. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council within two years after the date mentioned in Article 15(1);deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) undertake a review of the operation of this Directive and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council within fourtwo years after the date mentioned in Article 15(1). Such review shall cover all the elements of this Directive, with special attention to the compliance with standard of protection of personal data, the length of the data retention period and the quality of the assessments. It shall also contain the statistical information gathered pursuant to Article 18.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE