7 Amendments of Marie-Christine VERGIAT related to 2018/0186(CNS)
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In accordance with paragraphs 22 and 23 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making24, the Commission should evaluate this Directive, in particular on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring arrangements, in order to assess the effects of the Directive and the need for any further action, including its impact on fundamental rights, and the need for any further action. The evaluation should be made available to the European Parliament, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Fundamental Rights Agency. _________________ 24 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 (OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 applies to the processing of personal data carried out by Member States when implementing this Directive. The EU ETD system requires the processing of the personal data necessary for the purpose of verifying the identity of the applicant, printing the EU ETD sticker and facilitating travel of the data subject concerned. It is necessary to further specify safeguards applicable to the personal data processed, such as the maximum retention period of personal data collected. A maximum retention period of three years ismay be necessary to prevent possible abuses. This period should be proportionate and should not exceed 60 days after the end of validity of the EU ETD issued. The anonymisation and/or the erasure of personal data of applicants should not affect Member States’ abilities to monitor the application of this Directive. _________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Within 3624 hours after receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 2, the Member State of nationality shall respond to the consultation in accordance with Article 10(3) of Directive (EU) 2015/637 and shall confirm whether the applicant is its national. Upon confirmation of the applicant’s nationality, the assisting Member State shall provide the applicant with the EU ETD on the working day following that on which the response from the Member State of nationality is received at the latest.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. In duly justified exceptional cases, the Member States may take shorter or longer than the time-limits laid down in paragraphs 1 and 3.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) additional non-biometric security features and requirements including enhanced anti- forgery, counterfeiting and falsification standards;
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. The assisting Member State and the Member State of nationality shall retain the personal data of an applicant for no longer than three years60 days after the end of validity of the EU ETD issued. Upon expiry of the retention period, the personal data of an applicant shall be erased. Anonymised data may be kept if necessary for the monitoring and evaluation of this Regulation.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. No sooner than fivthree years after the date of transposition of this Directive, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Directive and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament and the Council, including on the appropriateness of the level of security of personal data and the possible impact on fundamental rights.