BETA

7 Amendments of Sophie AUCONIE related to 2010/2072(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 1
1. Calls on the Commission to submit forthwith a report on the use made to date of the Globalisation Adjustment Fund, setting out in particular a detailed account of how the appropriations were used and what proportion of overall funding they accounted for by comparison with other national and company-specific support measures; calls on the Commission to draw initial conclusions from that report and rapidly submitHopes that the annual report and mid- term review will make it possible to gauge the results obtained through EGF co- funded measures and will include proposals for the improvement of the fund;
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 2
2. Calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal forthwith stipulating that firms that are making workers redundant and which recorded profits in past reporting periods must contribute in an appropriate manner to meeting the social costs arising out of plant relocations and job cuts and securing the refinancing of the EGF;deleted
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 3
3. Calls on the Commission to replace the EGF in the medium term with a restructuring fund, financed by means of an EU-wide plant relocation levy and offering support to enterprises in proportion to the level of lasting replacement jobs created by them;deleted
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 4
4. Calls on the Commission to consider the introducetion of criteria by means of which the granting of EGF assistance can be linked as a matter of priority to restructuring measures designed to secure and create employment and ecologically sustainable and socially balanced development in the regions concernedwhich guarantee added value for the EGF over structural funds;
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5
5. Calls on the Commission, when allocating EGF assistance, to give the social partners a formal role in the decision-making proces to ensure that the social partners are closely involved in the application development and assessment phases;
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 6
6. Calls on the Commission to broaden the criteria for mobilisation of the EGF, in keeping wirecommend an adjustment to the EGF operating procedures applicable beyond the the above-mentioned conditions, to cover delocalisation within the European Union and toemporary provisions, which will cease to apply at the end of 2011, together with a simplify the ied application procedure significantly, with a view to making it a more effective crisis response instrument;
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 7
7. Calls on the Commission to increase significantly the financial framework for the EGF, in the light of the current economic and financial crisis and the Fund’s broader remit, and to create a separate title in the budget for the EGFrecommend the continuation of the EGF after 2013, and its endowments with a separate budget line.
2010/06/09
Committee: ECON