10 Amendments of David Maria SASSOLI related to 2011/0397(COD)
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 2 million passenger movements or 50 000 tonnes of freight for at least three consecutive years, nNo undertaking shall be permitted to provide ground-handling services whether as a supplier of ground-handling services, a sub-contractor or as a self-handling user unless it has been granted the appropriate approval. An undertaking meeting the requirements of this Chapter shall be entitled to receive an approval.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Airport Users' Committee disagrees with the decision of the managing body of the airport to centralise, or not to centralise, an infrastructure or with the scope of centralisation, it may ask the independent supervisory authority of the Member State concerned to decide whether the infrastructure concerned is to be centralised or not and to what extenexamine the grounds for the decision taken by the managing body of the airport.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 8
Article 27 – paragraph 8
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Where the use of the centralised infrastructures or airport installations is subject to a fee, the managing body of the airport or, where relevant, the managing body of the centralised infrastructure shall ensure that the level of fee is set out on the basis of relevant, objective, transparent and non- discriminatory criteria.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) the revenue from the different fees, and the total cost of the services covered by them and the return on assets;
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
(da) Where use of airport installations other than those defined as centralised infrastructures gives rise to a fee, the amount thereof shall be determined on the basis of objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria. Member States are free to allow the managing body of the airport to apply a common and transparent charging system, as set out in Directive 2009/12/EC.
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6
Article 28 – paragraph 6
6. Where the Airport Users' Committee disagrees with a fee set by the managing body of the airport or, where relevant, the managing body of the centralised infrastructure, it may ask the independent supervisory authority of the Member State concerned to decide oexamine the grounds for the change in the level of the fee.
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 7
Article 28 – paragraph 7
7. If a decisionisagreement on the levels of fees is brought before the independent supervisory authority in line with paragraph paragraph (6) of this Article, the procedure laid down in Article 6 of Directive 2009/12/EC shall apply.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. At the close of each financial year an independent auditor shall verify the situation and publicly declare that suchno financial cross-subsidisation has notfrom aeronautical activities has occurred. Where the legal entity providing groundhandling services receives cross- subsidisation from non-aeronautical activities, the entity managing the airport infrastructure or the entity managing the centralised infrastructure shall demonstrate that this isese subsidies do not come from aeronautical activities, in compliantce with paragraph (3).
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. Suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users shall respect these minimum quality standards. In addition, airport users and suppliers of groundhandling services shall respect the minimum quality standards in their contractual relations. The public authority concerned shall either directly or upon notification by the managing body of the airport impose appropriate penalties where the minimum quality standards laid down in the Airport Regulations and referred to in Paragraph (2) are not complied with. To ensure suppliers of groundhandling services comply with minimum requirements, the managing body of the airport shall have access to information on the parameters for groundhandling services laid down in the Service Level Agreements (SLAs). If the managing body finds that the SLAs do not comply with the airport’s minimum quality standards, it may ask the supervisory authority to take the appropriate action. These standards must be objective, proportional and non- discriminatory.