BETA

23 Amendments of David Maria SASSOLI related to 2016/0074(COD)

Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) To evaluate the effectiveness of technical measures, targets relating to the levels of unwanted catches; to the level of byincidental catches of sensitive species and to the extent of seabed habitats adversely affected by fishing; should be established that reflect the objectives of the CFP, Union environmental legislation (in particular Council Directive 92/43, Directive 2009/147/EC and Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council21 ), and international best practices. _________________ 21 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.1.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Member States should make the broadest possible use of the available measures in Regulation (EU) 508/2014 to support fishermen in implementing technical measures and ensure that the socio-economic objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy are taken into account.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) In order not to hinder scientific research, artificialdirect restocking and transplantation, the provisions of this Regulation should not apply to operations which may be necessary for the conducting of such activities.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) optimise exploitation patterns to provide protection for juveniles and/or spawning aggregations of marine species;
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall monitor the effectiveness of technical measures in achieving the targets set out in paragraph 1. The extent to which these targets have been achieved shall be reviewed as part of the reporting process set out in Article 34.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a Socio-economic objectives In order to take into account the socio- economic objectives of Article 2 (5)( c),( f) and (i) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, when adopting and implementing technical and conservation measures, Member State shall make extensive use of the measures in Articles 38, 39 and 40 of Regulation (EU) N°508/2014.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5 a) ‘conservation status of a species’ means the conservation status of species as defined by Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC;
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
(5 b) ‘conservation status of a habitat’ means the conservation of habitats as defined by Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC;
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 29
(29) ‘St Andrews cross’ means a grab which employs a scissor-like actionused to harvest, for example, bivalve molluscs or red coral from the seabed;
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Where suchensitive habitats occur in waters under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of a Member State, that Member State is empowered to establish closed areas or other conservation measures to protect such sensitive habitats, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Such measures shall be compatible with the objectives of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 1380/2013 and be at least as stringent as measures under Union law.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to fishing activities in the Mediterranean Sea or catches of species which are exempted from the application of the landing obligation in accordance with Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 Member States may, jointly or individually, submit joint recommendations defining appropriate technical measures at the regional level that deviate from the measures set out in paragraph 1.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
- detailed rules on the signal and implementation characteristics of acoustic deterrent devices as referred to in Part D of Annexes V to, VI, VII, VIII and X;
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – indent 6
- detailed rules of the design and deployment of bird scaring lines and weighted lines as referred to in Part D of Annexes VI, VII and VIIX.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) in the case of fish below the minimum conservation reference size, they are sold for purposes other than direct human consumption.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – title
ArtificialDirect restocking and transplantation
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The technical measures provided for in this Regulation shall not apply to fishing operations conducted solely for the purpose of artificialdirect restocking or transplantation of marine species, provided that those operations are carried out with the permission and under the authority of the Member State or Member States having a direct management interest.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Where the artificialdirect restocking or transplantation is carried out in the waters of another Member State or Member States, the Commission and all those Member States shall be informed at least one month in advance of the intention to conduct such fishing operations.
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Articles 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 153(3)(second subparagraph), 14, 15(1) and (2), 16 and 25 are deleted;
2017/06/13
Committee: PECH
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point o
(o) berried female crawfish (Palinuridae spp.) and berried female lobster (Homarus gammarus) in all Union waters except when used for direct restocking or transplantation purposes;Does not affect the English version.)
2017/06/14
Committee: PECH
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IX – Part B – paragraph 1
1. Baseline mesh sizes for towed and encircling gears
2017/06/14
Committee: PECH
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IX – Part B – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The following codend mesh sizes shall apply in the Mediterranean. Member States may allow a derogation for boat seines, shore seines, and purse seines, if these are covered by a management plan as referred to in Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006, provided that the fisheries concerned are highly selective, have a negligible effect on the marine environment, and are not affected by provisions under Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006.
2017/06/14
Committee: PECH
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IX – Part D
Mitigation measures for sensitive species 1. catches of cetaceans 1.1. It shall be prohibited for vessels of 12 metres or over in overall length to deploy static nets in the Mediterranean Sea without the simultaneous use of active acoustic deterrent devices. 1.2. Point 1.1 shall not apply to fishing operations conducted solely for the purpose of scientific investigation which are carried out with the authorisation and under the authority of the Member States or Member States concerned and which aim at developing new technical measures to reduce the incidental capture or killing of cetaceans. 1.3. Member States shall monitor and assess, by means of scientific studies or pilot projects, the effectiveness of the mitigation devices as described in point 1.1 in the fisheries and areas concerned. 2. catches of seabirds Vessels fishing with longlines in the Mediterranean Sea shall use at least two of the following mitigation measures: bird scaring lines, weighted lines, setting the longline gear during the hours of darkness with the minimum of deck lighting necessary for safety.Part D deleted Measures to reduce incidental Measures to reduce incidental
2017/06/14
Committee: PECH