BETA

26 Amendments of David Maria SASSOLI related to 2016/2079(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea,
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU Regulation),
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the Mediterranean, with its 17 000 maritime species, is one of the areas with the greatest biodiversity in the world, and whereas a multi-species approach therefore needs to be taken to its management;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the Mediterranean Sea is affected by a range of factors which, together with fishing, have an impact on the health of fish stocks (such as pollution caused by maritime transport);
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of enforcing, in the short term and comprehensively, the targets and measures laid down in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and of a timely, urgent and effective implementation, including timely drafting of the multiannual management plans provided for in the CFP, taking an multi-species, ecosystem-based approach; stresses, in particular, the need to achieve the Good Environmental Status (GES) goal established by Framework Directive 2008/56/EC on the strategy for the marine environment;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers it urgent to provide a response that is collective, based on multi- tier cooperation – international, European, national and regional; considers that all stakeholders, including fishermen, scientists, managers of marine protected areas and NGOs, should be involved in an inclusive, bottom-up process;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the CFP recognisstipulates that access to fishing opportunities should be distributed primarily among small-scale non-industrial fisherme, where provided for, must be based on economic, social, economic and other criteria that are transparent and objective; calls, for this reason, for those in small coastal areas, and should include incentives (particular attention to the paid to small-scale fishing, not least in the light of the incentives provided for in Article 7(1)(d) of the CFP regulation) in order to promote more selective fishing techniques which have a lower impact on the marine ecosystem and fishery resources; notes that, for this reason, efforts should be made in this direction, to ensure that incentives and preferential access to coastal fishing areas are given to the small-scale (artisanal) fleet as opposed to those fisheries segments that are not selective and have a greater impact;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses firmly that in the Mediterranean basin there is still an extensive problem of illegal, unreported or unregulated (IUU) fishing, even in EU countries; considers that no intervention to safeguard resources, including and above all for small-scale fisheries economies, can be effective unless IUU fishing is combated firmly and decisively; believes, accordingly, that inspection procedures should be harmonised throughout the Mediterranean basin in view of the widely varying inspection and penalty procedures applied in respect of the area's fishermen;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it a matter of priority to step up monitoring activity on land, along the entire distribution chain (markets and catering trade), and at sea, especially in areas in which fishing is prohibited (temporarily or permanently)temporarily suspended or prohibited;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers it feasible to introduce non-transferable quotas, especially for species subject to single-species fisheries; iIs of the view that, to avoid social inequalities, fishing opportunities should be allocated using objective and transparent criteria, including environmental, social and economic criteria, and should also be fairly distributed within the various fisheries segments, including traditional and small- scale fishing; is of the view, in addition, that incentives should be provided for fleets to use more selective fishing equipment and techniques that have a reduced impact on the marine environment, in keeping with Article 17 of the CFP regulation;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the system of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean covers an inadequate areaarea that remains small, with major coverage disparities between the various basins; considers it crucial to increase the percentage of marine protected areas andcountries with a stake in the basin and a general shortage of economic resources; considers it crucial to cooperate more closely with the CGPM and non-EU countries with a view to identifying areas to be covered by protection measures, in addition to implement and establishing an effective management, monitoring and control system to check they are effectivefor marine protected areas; acknowledges and supports the role marine protected areas play as advanced laboratories for scientific research and the opportunity they provide for cooperation and shared management with fishermen;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Considers it vital for policies to take a varied and nuanced approach, within management plans, and with different criteria based on the biological characteristics of the species and technical characteristics of the fishing methods; considers, moreover, that appropriate planning in space (rotating ‘no fishing’ areas, total or partial closure depending on fishing systems) and time (biological recovery periods) should be the vital component of anyenvisaged in future multiannual plan, in addition tos and receive the appromotion of technical measures aimed at maximum gear selectivitypriate financial compensation;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that in the Mediterranean, a minimum permitted size should be adopted for all commercial species, depending on sexual maturity and based on the best scientific knowledge;deleted
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to assistand the Member States to share best practices with non-EU Mediterranean countries in order to modernisinge their fisheries sectors and to achieve sustainable fisheries, also through a policy of fisheries agreements that are more balanced, fair and sustainable;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that the Commission should issue guidelines on how best toMember States should promote full use of funding from the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the European Neighbourhood Instrument;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Considers it vital to promote, emphasise and provide incentives for cooperation between small-scale fishermen within the same area or region, for the purpose of tackling jointly the planning and management of local fisheries resources with the aim of effective and practical regionalisation, in accordance with the aims of the CFP, given; considers that the enormous fragmentation and differentiation of occupations, targets, technical characteristics and equipment used make it practically impossible to adopt a cross-cutting and unambiguous approachis a feature peculiar to fishing in the Mediterranean and that a cross-cutting and unambiguous approach would not respect and emphasise these local specificities;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Observes that, despite the recent improvements, the number of stocks without a real and objective assessment of their status remains high and tha, on account of the frequently denounced shortage of data: in fact the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) deplores the fact that we have witnessed an actual reduction in the number of assessments has actually fallen, from 44 in 2012 to a mere 15 in 2014;.
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that rational and sustainable fisheries management depends on scientific use of the relevant data,of resources is contingent on the quantity and scientific use of data collected on factors such as fishing capacity, fishing activities engaged in, and their socioeconomic situation, and the biological status of the stock exploited and the current socioeconomic situation of fishing itself;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 140 #
19. Notes that only 40% of fish landed in the area covered by the GFCM comes from stocks for which a scientific assessment submitted to the Commission exists, and that the percentage falls when it comes to stocks covered by a management plan; draws attention to the need to improve the cover of scientific assessments of the status of stocks and to increase the percentage of landings derived from types of fishing regulated by multiannual management plans;(Does not affect the English version.)
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need for integrated approaches which take into account simultaneously the heterogeneity of the marine environment, the complexity of species (both exploited and unexploited) in the sea, the various characteristics and the conduct of fishing activities, as well as all other factors that have a bearing on the stock's health;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 147 #
22. Strongly supports the proposal by the GFCM to create a catalogue of fishing activities and to include information on fishing gear and operations, a description of fishing areas and an indication of target species and by-catches, for use in providing a complete description of fishing activities in the area and interactions with other sectors, such as recreational fishing;(Does not affect the English version.)
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the strong and crucial need to share data and combat their inaccessibility and dispersion, by developing an all-embracing online archive, which should be publicly funded and should contain all the data on fishing resources and fishing activities, so as to facilitate monitoring of quality and multiple, independent analyses and thus to adopt a constructive approach to stock assessments;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that how the impacts, as well as the quantities, extent and characteristics and scale of IUU fishing (i.e. illegal fishing), are currently not assessed and are therefore under, unreported and unregulated fishing), are appraised varies among the different countries concerned in the Mediterranean basin and that these are not therefore correctly represented in information about the current status of fisheries and about trends over time, yet ought to be adequately taken into account in the development of scientific assessments for purposes of fisheries management;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that effective results and full accomplishment can be attained by means of a high level of responsibility and awareness among operators in the industry, by developing the skills of all fishermen (both commerciprofessional and recreational) and educating them, and by involving them in decision-making, adding specific actions for the dissemination of good practices;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers it important also to raise awareness among consumers, who must be and educated them to consume fish responsibly, prioritising local species fished by sustainable methods, possibly coming from stocks which are not overexploited and not widely sold; considers it necessary, to this end, to establish a traceability system, but also and above all to inform consumers completely and reliablypromote a thoroughly reliable traceability and consumer information system in order to combat food fraud;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that, in the light of this new scenario and of all these new factors which interact in the Mediterranean and which have altered the approach to fishing in the area, Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 must be revised for the Mediterranean, to bring it into line with the current situation;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH