BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

7 Amendments of Jürgen CREUTZMANN related to 2009/2222(INI)

Amendment 127 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that, in order to maintain the delivery of quality SSGI, the Member States need new income streams, such as a financial transaction tax;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the 2005 Monti-Kroes response to the Altmark case to be broadened so as to simplify the rules, improve flexibility in their application, and expand the derogations. The de minimis threshold should be raised to at least EUR 500 000 over a three-year cycle;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises that public procurement rules need to be simplified and made more flexible so that public service obligations can be fulfilled;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission formally to recognise other modalities for the selection of providers, such as ‘in-house’ and ‘service concession’ methods, and explicitly to accord equal value to all options for the contracting and financing of SSGI; calls for the expansion of the ‘in- house’ method to include service providers who meet specific general interest criteria;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Supports the normative anchoring of a practical ‘in-house’ tendering option for SSGI, based on the model of the revised Regulation 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and road, which wouldith the provideso that any competent local authority may decide to provide services itself or to award public service contracts to a legally distinct entity over which the competent local authority exercises control similar to that exercised over its own departmentin-house tendering should be permitted only in exceptional cases and must on no account prevent transparent, public tendering;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for redefinition of the concept of ‘most economically advantageous offer’ so as to make national and local social and quality criteria for the delivery of SSGI an obligatory requirement in procurement contracts, including subcontracts;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #
Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Proposes the establishment of a high- level multi-stakeholder taskforce – initially with a two-year mandate – that is open, flexible and transparent, to pursue implementation of the policy initiatives identified in this report and in the 3rd Forum recommendations, the Commission’s second Biennial Report and the SPC reports, as well as any other relevant proposals; to initiate a full review of all rules, particularly state-aid and procurement rules, which impact on SSGI and to evaluate how they need to be redesigned so as to respect and support Member States’ responsibilities in the definition and delivery of SSGI, taking account of the current Commission review of rules;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation