9 Amendments of Jürgen CREUTZMANN related to 2010/2289(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that a more unifiedbarrier-free and competitive single market willshould be come a reality only to the extent to which it succeeds to bringpleted in order to bring concrete advantages for workers, students, pensioners or citizens in general, and for businesses, particularly SMEs, in their daily lives;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that good governance is crucial to achieve the economic and social objectives of the single market, including free movement of workers and pensioners, as well as the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion and, a high level of education and training and the portability of pensions;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Acknowledges the important role of EURES in facilitating the free movement of workers within the Union and ensuring the close cooperation between national employment services; calls on the Member States to increase the public awareness for this useful service to enable more EU citizens to fully benefit from employment opportunities across the EU;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the important role of support networks and tools, such as EURES and SOLVIT,such as SOLVIT and the European Consumer Centres in making the single market work for the European citizens and businesses; strongly welcomes the Commission's announcement to continue to promote a one-stop shop, integrating all existing services in one single access point and providing citizens and businesses with information and support concerning their rights in the single market as well as practical information on national rules and procedures; calls on the Member States to increase the public awareness of these tool one- stop shop and its constituent services;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the importance of a stronger and earlier involvement of stakeholders in designing, adopting, implementing and monitoring the measures to boost growth and citizens‘ rights in the single market; notes that many of the proposed measures of the Single Market Act fall within the responsibilities of national or sub- national authorities and thus would require their active involvement at all stages; emphasises furthermore that dialogue with the social partners and civil society is of the essence in restoring confidence in the single market;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes the Commission's proposal to develop a strategy to enable the wider application of the Internal Market Information System (IMI) and to integrate it with other networks for more efficient administrative cooperation and better implementation of internal market legislation;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Acknowledges the important role of EURES in facilitating the free movement of workers within the Union and ensuring the close cooperation between national employment services; calls on the Member States to increase the public awareness for this useful service to enable more EU citizens to fully benefit from employment opportunities across the EU;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 c (new)
Paragraph 14 c (new)
14c. Calls on the Commission to examine, on the basis of the announced public consultation, the possibility of creating a European form of collective redress for individual victims of competition law violations, based on the opt-in principle and taking into account the criteria laid down in the European Parliament resolution of 26 March 2009, stipulating that compensation should be paid to the identified group of people or their nominee only for the damage actually suffered; calls on the Commission to consider the ways in which such a mechanism could be incorporated into existing national legal system;