Activities of Jürgen CREUTZMANN related to 2012/2132(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the implementation of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive
Amendments (8)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the application by Member States of internal market rules, particularly those concerning the free movement of audiovisual media services and the country of origin principle referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2010/13/EU;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that Member States should ensure that audiovisual media services are accessible free of charge;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates that the proportion of advertising and teleshopping spots should not exceed 12 minutes per hour; highlights the need to monitor commercial formats devised to skirt this restriction and calls for a ban on advertisingprejudicial advertising, as described in Article 9 of Directive 2010/13/EU, during programmes for children and young people; recommends an analysis of best practice in this field in certain countries as the basis for future reform of the legislative framework; calls on the Commission to update in 2013 its interpretative communication on television advertising to take account of experience gained under the EU Platform for Action on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, and the EU Alcohol and Health Forum;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the vagueness of the term ‘platform’ calls for legal safeguards on the inclusion of platform providers, content providers and other service operators among the media covered by this Directive; ConsiDraws attention to the approach adopted in recital 24 of Directive 2010/13/EU, which interprets the concept of 'programme' in a dynamic way, taking into account developments in television broadcasting in orders that the vagueness of the term ‘platform’ calls for legal safeguards on the inclusion of platform providers, content providers and other service operators among the media covered by this Diro prevent disparities as regards free movement and competition and in order to respond to the target audience's expectations vis-à-vis regulatory protectiveon;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Supports the emphasis in Directive 2010/13/EU on encouraging the introduction of co-regulation and/or self-regulatory regimes, as referred to in Article 4(7).
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Asks that audiovisual media services and their related devices give consideration to the rights of ease of use and consumption; stresses the need to define the concepts of a ‘television service’ and to ensure that it is fully and equally accessible'programme' in order to ensure that these services are fully and equally accessible and that a level playing field applies for all programme providers in the internal market;