BETA

Activities of Alexandra THEIN related to 2011/0359(COD)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities PDF (1 MB) DOC (1 MB)
2016/11/22
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2011/0359(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(1 MB)

Amendments (64)

Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title
PThe proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities (Text with EEA relevance)is rejected.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Adequate internal organisation of statutory auditors and audit firms should contribute to preventing any threats to their independence. Thus, owners or shareholders of an audit firm, as well as those managing it, should not intervene in the carrying out of a statutory audit in any way which jeopardises the independence and objectivity of the statutory auditor who carries out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm. Additionally, statutory auditors and audit firms should establish appropriate internal policies and procedures in relation to employees and other persons involved in the statutory audit activity within their organisations in order to ensure compliance with their statutory obligations. Those policies and procedures should in particular seek to prevent and address any threats to independence and ensure the quality, integrity and thoroughness of the statutory audit. Those policies and procedures should be proportionate in view of the scale and complexity of the business of the statutory auditor or audit firm and the audited entities.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The provision of services other than statutory audit to audited entities by statutory auditors, audit firms or members of their networks may compromise their independence. Therefore, it is appropriate to require the statutory auditor, the audit firm and the members of their network not to provide non-audit services to their audited entities. The provision ofsafeguards in the form of a prohibition of certain non- audit services by an audit firm to a company would prevent that audit firm from carrying out statutory audit of that company, thus resulting in a reduction of the audit firms available to provide statutory audit, in particular with regard to the audit of large public-interest entities where the market is concentrated. Asthe statutory auditor cannot perform to their audited entities, as well as result, in order to secure that a minimum number of audit firms is able to provide audit services to large public-interest entities, it is appropriate to request that audit firms of significant dimension focus their professional activity on the carrying out of statutory audit and are not allowed to undertake other services unconnected to their statutory audit function such as consultancy or advisory services- tendering, at the behest of the audit committee, of any non-audit service and financial audit related services above a 30% threshold.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Audit committees, or bodies performing an equivalent function within the audited entity, have a decisive role in contributing to high-quality statutory audit. It is particularly important to reinforce the independence and technical competence of the audit committee by requiring that a majority of its members is independent and that at least one member of the committee has competence in auditing and another one in auditing and/or accounting. Members of the audit committee should take part in skill enhancement programmes to ensure an appropriate level of technical knowledge to fulfil their roles. The Commission Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the role of non- executive or supervisory directors of listed companies and on the committees of the (supervisory) board26 sets out how audit committees should be established and function. Considering, however, the dimension of boards in companies with reduced market capitalisation and in small and medium-sized public-interest entities, it would be appropriate that the functions assigned to the audit committee for those entities, or to a body performing equivalent functions within the audited entity, may be performed by the administrative or supervisory body as a whole. Public- interest entities which are UCITS or alternative investment funds should also be exempted from the obligation to have an audit committee. This exemption takes into account the fact that where those funds function merely for the purpose of pooling assets, the employment of an audit committee is not appropriate. UCITS and alternative investments funds, as well as their management companies, operate in a strictly defined regulatory environment and are subject to specific governance mechanisms such as controls exercised by their depositary.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) It is also important that the role of the audit committee in the selection of a new statutory auditor or audit firm be reinforced, for the benefit of a more informed decision of the general meeting of shareholders or members of the audited entity. Hence, when making a proposal to the general meeting, the board should explain whether it follows the recommendation of the audit committee and, if not, why. The recommendation of the audit committee should include at least two possible choices for the audit engagement, a comprehensive assessment of both proposals, and a duly justified preference for one of them, so that the general meeting can make a real choice. In order to provide a fair and proper justification in its recommendation, the audit committee should use the results of a mandatory selectiontender procedure organised by the audited entity, under the responsibility of the audit committee. In such selectiona tender procedure, the audited entity should invite statutorypublish a call to auditors or audit firms, including smaller ones, to present proposals for the audit engagement. Tender documents should contain transparent and non- discriminatory selection criteria to be used for the evaluation of proposals. Considering, however, that this selection procedure could entail disproportionate costs for companies with reduced market capitalisation or small and medium-sized public-interest entities having regard to their dimension, it is appropriate to relieve such entities from this obligation.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) In order to address the familiarity threat and therefore reinforce the independence of auditors and audit firms, it is important to establish a maximum duration of the audit engagement of a statutory auditor or audit firm in a particular audited entity. AFurthermore, a comprehensive, transparent and independent evaluation of audit quality should be regularly and appropriately documented. This comprehensive assessment should form the basis for the annual auditor selection by the general assembly. The purpose of mandatory tendering for the audit engagement is to not only evaluate the incumbent provider's performance but also the requirements of the audited entity. Furthermore, an appropriate gradual rotation mechanism should also be established with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including the key audit partners carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm. It is also important to provide for an appropriate period within which such statutory auditor or audit firm may not carry out the statutory audit of the same entity. In order to ensure a smooth transition, the former auditor should transfer a handover file with relevant information to the incoming auditor.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions laid down in Article 2 of Directive 2006/43/EC shall apply, except for the definitions of 'audit report' and 'competent authority'.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) a statutory auditor or an audit firm shall establish adequate policies and procedures to ensure that outsourcing of important audit functions is not undertaken in such a way as to impair the quality of the statutory auditor’s or audit firm’s internal control and the ability of the competent authoritbodies to supervise the statutory auditor's or audit firm's compliance with the obligations laid down in this Regulation;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A statutory auditor or an audit firm carrying out statutory audit of public- interest entities may provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings statutory audit services and, related financial audit services and other assurance services, subject to prior approval of the audit committee and as long as these services do not pose a threat to independence that cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of safeguards.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the statutory auditor belongs to a network, a member of such network may provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings within the Union statutory audit services or, related financial audit services and other assurance services, subject to prior approval of the audit committee and as long as these services do not pose a threat to independence that cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of safeguards.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. For the purposes of this Article, related financial audit services shall meanand other assurance services shall mean in particular:
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) providing certification on compliance with tax requirements where such attestation is required by national law, preparation of tax declarations, advice on indirect taxes, payroll tax, transfer prices, customs duties and public support measures, support regarding tax inspections and tax authority enquiries;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) auditing technology systems, internal control or risk management procedure related to the preparation and/or control of financing information included in the financial statements and advice on risk;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) providing assurance on the implementation and further development of electronic data processing systems;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e c (new)
(ec) audit of occupational pension schemes and pension obligations;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) any other statutory duty related to audit work imposed by Union and/or national legislation to the statutory auditor or audit firm.;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) providing comfort letters for investors in the context of the issuance of an undertaking's securities and fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
For the purposes of this Article, non-audit services shall mean in particular:
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iii
(iii) designing andor implementing technology systems and internal control or risk management procedure related to the preparation and/or control of financing information included in the financial statements and advice on risk;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iv
(iv) valuation services, providing fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point vi
(vi) designing andor implementing financial information technology systems for public- interest entities as referred to in Article 2(13)(b) to (j) of Directive 2006/43/EC;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point viii a (new)
(viiia) human resources services, including recruiting senior management;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point viii b (new)
(viiib) legal and tax services that go beyond the presentation of alternatives; tax services for natural persons;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b
b) services which may entail conflict of interest: i) human resources services, including recruiting senior management; ii) providing comfort deletters for investors in the context of the issuance of an undertaking's securities; iii) designing and implementing financial information technology systems for public-interest entities as referred to in Article 2(13)(a) of Directive 2006/43/EC; iv) due diligence services to the vendor or the buy side on potential mergers and acquisitions and providing assurance on the audited entity to other parties at a financial or corporate transaction.d
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
By derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, the services mentioned in point (b)(iii) and (iv) may be provided by the statutory auditor or the audit firm, subject to prior approval by the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1).deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5
By derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, the services mentioned in point (b)(i) and (ii) may be provided by the statutory auditor or the audit firm, subject to prior approval by the audit committee as referred to in Article 31 of this Regulation.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Being involved in the decision-taking of the audited entity and the provision of the services referred to in points (ii) and (iii) of paragraph 3(a)non- audit services shall be considered as affecting such independence in all cases.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
The provision of the services referred to in points (i) and (iv) to (viii) of paragraph 3(a) shall be presumed to affect such independence.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Where an audit firm generates more than one third of its annual audit revenues from large public-interest entities and belongs to a network whose members have combined annual audit revenues which exceed EUR 1 500 million within the European Union, it shall comply with the following conditions: (a) it shall not directly or indirectly provide to any public interest entity non- audit services; (b) it shall not belong to a network which provides non-audit services within the Union; (c) any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3 shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5 % of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; (d) the entities which provide the services listed in paragraph 3shall not directly or indirectly hold together more than 10 % of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; (e) such audit firm shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5 % of the capital or of the voting rights in any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Where an audit firm generates more than one third of its annual audit revenues from large public-interest entities and belongs to a network whose members have combined annual audit revenues which exceed EUR 1 500 million within the European Union, it shall comply with the following conditions: a) it shall not directly or indirectly provide to any public interest entity non-audit services; b) it shall not belong to a network which provides non-audit services within the Union; c) any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3 shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5 % of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; d) the entities which provide the services listed in paragraph 3shall not directly or indirectly hold together more than 10 % of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; e) such audit firm shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5 % of the capital or of the voting rights in any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with ArCompetent authorities may give noticle 68 for the purpose of adapting the list of related financial audit services referred to in paragraph 2 and the list of non-audit services referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. When using such powers, the Commission shall take into account developments in auditing and the audit professionof further services and/or activities which it considers impart a conflict of interest and shall notify ESMA, EIOPA, EBA, and where appropriate, the ESRB.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The audit report shall not be longer than four pages or 10000 characters (without spaces). It shall not contain any cross-references to the additional report to the audit committee referred to in Article 23.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The statutory auditor(s) or the audit firm(s) carrying out statutory audit of credit institutions and insurance undertakings, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 and of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010, respectively shall also submit the additional report to the EBA, EIOPA and the ESRB.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) describe the distribution of tasks among the statutory auditor(s)s and/or the audit firm(s) and include a description of the scope and timing of the audit and significant findings from the statutory audit conducted. This should include any significant deficiencies in the internal control system of the audited entity; how they addressed significant difficulties encountered during the audit and other matters arising from the statutory audit that in the statutory auditor's or audit firm's professional judgment are significant to the financial reporting process;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
In is the instance of the audited entity being exempted from the obligation to have an audit committee, the audited entity shall decide which body or organ of the entity shall engage with the statutory auditor or audit firm for the purposes of the obligations set out in this Article.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Members of the audit committee shall take part in skill enhancement programmes in order to ensure an adequate technical knowledge level to fulfil their tasks.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Unless it concerns the renewal of an audit engagement in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 33(1), tThe recommendation of the audit committee referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, shall be prepared following a selectiontender procedure organizsed by the audited entity respecting the following criteria:
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the audited entity shall be free to invite any statutory auditors or audit firms is free to submit proposals for the provision of the statutory audit service on the condition that Article 33(2) is respected and that at least one of the invited auditors or firms is not one who received more than 15% of the total audit fees from large public-interest entities in the Member State concerned in the previous calendar year;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the audited entity shall be free to choose the method to contact the invited statutory auditor(s) or audit firm(s) and shall not be required to committee shall publish a call for tenders in the Official Journal of the European Union, where necessary, and/or in national gazettes or newspapers;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the audited entity committee shall prepare tender documents to the intention of the invited statutory auditor(s) or audit firm(s). Those tender documents shall allow the audit firm to understand the business of the audited entity and the type of statutory audit that is to be carried out. The tender documents shall contain transparent and non- discriminatory selection criteria that shall be used by the audited entity committee to evaluate the proposals made by statutory auditors or audit firms;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) the audited entity committee shall be free to define the selection procedure and may conduct direct negotiations with interested tenderers in the course of the procedure;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) the audit committeed entity shall evaluateperform a comprehensive assessment of the proposals made by the statutory auditors or audit firms in accordance with the selection criteria predefined in the tender documents. The audited entity shall prepare a report on the conclusions of the selection procedure, which shall be validated by the audit committee. The audited entity and the audit committee shall take into consideration any inspection report on the applicant statutory auditor or audit firm referred to in Article 40(6) and published by the competent authority pursuant to Article 44(d);
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point g
(g) the audited entity committee shall be able to demonstrate to the competent authority referred to in Article 35 that the selection procedure was conducted in a fair manner.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The audit committee shall be responsible for the selection procedure referred to in the first subparagraph.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The proposal of the administrative or supervisory board to the general meeting of shareholders or members of the audited entity for the appointment of statutory auditors or audit firms shall include the recommendation made by the audit committee. The proposal to the general meeting shall be accompanied by the results of the comprehensive assessment referred to in Article 32 (2) and (3).
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The public-interest entity may renew thise audit engagement only once, provided this is based on a proposal of the audit committee after a re-tendering process has taken place. Shareholders at the annual general meeting shall formally approve the statutory auditor(s) engagement.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where throughout a continuous engagement of 6 years two statutory auditors or audit firms have been appointed, the maximum duration of the engagement of each statutory auditor or audit firm shall not exceed 9 years.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, on an exceptional basis the public-interest entity may request the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) to grant an extension to re-appoint the statutory auditor or audit firm for an additional engagement. In case of appointment of two statutory auditors or audit firms, this third engagement shall not exceed three years. In case of appointment of one statutory auditor or audit firm, this third engagement shall not exceed two years.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The statutory auditor or audit firm shall establish an appropriate gradual rotation mechanism with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including at least the persons who are registered as statutory auditors. The gradual rotation mechanism shall be undertaken in phases on the basis of individuals rather than of a completethe entire engagement team. It shall be proportionate in view of the scale and the dimension of the activity of the statutory auditor or audit firm.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The former statutory auditor or audit firm shall also grant access to the incoming statutory auditor(s) or audit firm(s) to the additional reports to the audit committee referred to in Article 23 of previous years and to any information transmitted to competent authorities pursuant to Articles 25 and 27.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 4 – chapter 1 – title
Or. de Justification
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35
[...]deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
Article 35 a Article 35a Principles of public oversight With regard to public oversight over statutory auditors and audit firms for public-interest entities, the principles of public oversight under Directive 2006/43/EC of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, in particular Chapter VIII thereof, shall apply.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36 Conditions of independence The competent authorities and any authority to which the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) has delegated tasks shall be independent of statutory auditors and audit firms. A person shall not be involved in the governance of those authorities if in the course of the three previous years he or she: (a) has carried out statutory audits of public-interest entities; (b) held voting rights in an audit firm; (c) was member of the administrative, management or supervisory body of an audit firm; (d) was an employee or otherwise associated with an audit firm. The funding of those authorities shall be secure and free from any possible undue influence by statutory auditors and audit firms.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
Article 37 Professional secrecy The obligation of professional secrecy shall apply to all persons who are or have been employed by competent authorities or by any authority to whom the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) has delegated tasks, including experts contracted by such authorities. Information covered by professional secrecy may not be disclosed to any other person or authority except by virtue of the obligations of this Regulation or of the laws, regulations or administrative procedures of a Member State.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38
[...]deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39
Article 39 Cooperation with other competent authorities at national level The competent authority designated pursuant to Article 35(1) and, where appropriate, any authority to whom that competent authority has delegated tasks shall cooperate at national level with: (a) the competent authorities responsible for the approval and registration of statutory auditors and audit firms pursuant to Directive 2006/43/EC; (b) the authorities referred to in Article 35(2), whether they have been designated competent authorities for the purposes of this Regulation or not; (c) the financial intelligence units and the competent authorities referred to in Articles 21 and 37 of Directive 2005/60/EC.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50
[...]deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 10(6) and 50(4) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [date of entry into force of this Regulation].
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of powers referred to in Articles 10(6) and 50(4) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 10(6) and 50(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of [two2 months] of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [two months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 a (new)
Article 69 a Report on ESMA The Commission shall by X X ( five years after the end of the transitional period) prepare a report on ESMA's current and future role. The Commission shall assess whether ESMA has enough resources to fulfil its tasks according to this Regulation.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70
[...]deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 3
However, Article 32(7) shall apply from […] [the date of the entry into force of the Regulation] and Article 10(5) shall apply from […] [3 years after the entry into force of the Regulation].
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI