BETA

Activities of Britta REIMERS related to 2009/2236(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Future of the CAP after 2013 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2236(INI)

Amendments (18)

Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Affirms that Europe will have to make a substantial contribution to meeting that need against a background of less land, less water and reduced energy inputs due to the impact of climate change, which will act as a serious constraint on European capacity to increase supply; points out that, against this background, agricultural research assumes an important role in guaranteeing food production through more efficient use of resources;
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that agriculture is well placed to make a significant contribution to the fight againstadjust to climate change and further reduce its climate changeimpact by continuing to reduce its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and increasing carbon sequestration;
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Believes that agriculture has a tremendous potential to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate changethe climate impact of agriculture can be considerably mitigated by means of improved education and training of people working in agriculture, better use of innovations stemming from research and development and improving the efficiency of agricultural production;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that agriculture is well placed to make a major contribution to delivering the new EU 2020 Strategy priorities of tacklingadapting to climate change and creating new jobs through green growth whilst at the same time continuing to provide food security for European consumers by producing safe and high-quality food products;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30 a. Calls for the two-pillar model of the CAP to be maintained beyond 2013; considers that this structure of the CAP, like the present range of measures under Pillar 2, provides a suitable basis for overcoming future challenges;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 421 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Calls for a fairer distribution of CAP payments and insists that it should be fair to farmers in both new and old Member States;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Believes that agriculture has a leading role to play in tacklingcan continue to mitigate its climate changeimpact by reducing GHG emissions, increasing carbon sequestration capacity and developing and using more renewable energy sources; believes that climate considerations should be integrated only across CAP measures where appropriatePillar 2 measures;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 469 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Notes that the market fails to reward farmers for protecting the environment; therefore believes that the CAP must become greener by incentivising farmers to maximiseshould provide voluntary incentive systems as compensation for the delivery of additional eco-system services to further improve the sound environmental resource management of EU farmland;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 517 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Recognises the wide range of new priorities for the CAP and notes that the new Member States' expectation when they joined the European Union was that CAP support would, over time, reach parity with old Member Statesequal participation in the CAP; therefore calls for the 2013 CAP budget amount to be at least maintained post-2013 ifso that the EU is tocan meet its current commitments and successfully deliver the new priorities;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 541 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Insists that the CAP should not be renationalised and therefore believes that core direct support under Pillar 1 should remain fully financed by the EU budget, hence rejecting any further co-financing under Pillar 1 which could harm fair competition within the EU Single Market;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 549 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 – introductory part
48. Calls for a fairn objectively-targeted distribution of CAP funds to farmers across the EU; recalls that to respect the diversity of farming in the EU, objective criteria must be found in order to define a fair system of distribution: n objectively-targeted system of distribution: it should be pointed out that direct payments are a way of contributing to income guarantees and risk-hedging for farmers, offsetting the socially desirable high standards in the EU and the continuing reduction of tariff barriers, and providing remuneration for social agricultural activities which receive no market compensation; finds that the level of economic development, which is very different across the Member States, must also be taken into account;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 573 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) Rejects any form of reallocation of appropriations from direct payments to Pillar 2 (modulation, degression according to farm size);
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 585 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
50. Believes that, in the interest of simplification, clarity and a common approach, funding for each of the five building blocks of the CAP must be agreed from the start of the reform;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 596 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
51. Believes that direct support should move to an area basis in all Member States by 2020 at the latest, allowing those that are still using the historical payments system the flexibility to phase in the difficult changes at their own speed9;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 677 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
57. Believes that, an EU-funded top-up direct area payment should be made available to farmers through simple contracts rewarding them for reducing their carbon emissions per unit of production and increasings well as voluntary measures under their sequestration of carbon; notes that this would have the double benefit of making EU agriculture more environmentally and economically sustainable through improved efficiency and would also ensure that farmers can financially benefit from increased carbon sequestration on their land and put them on the same footing as other industries which are in the EU ETS; calls for clear and measurable criteria and targets to be defined appropriately to allow these payments to be implemented as soon as possiblecond pillar, farmers should be offered additional incentives to reduce greenhouse gases;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 684 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
58. Calls for the continuation of specific measures under the second pillar of the CAP to compensate farmers producing in areas with natural handicaps in order to ensure that agricultural activity takes place and local food is produced across the EU, reducing the threat of land abandonment and ensuring balanced territorial management across the EU; considers that this support scheme should remain co- financed as it currently is;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 703 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59
59. Believes that the CAP, under the second pillar, needs to further incentivise biodiversity and environmental protection measures by providing the opportunity for the vast majority of agricultural land to be covered by agri- environmental schemes to reward farmers for the delivery of additional eco-system services, while other measures beneficial to the environment such as organic farming projects, the sustainable use of forests, water and soil, and the development of high natural value farming should also be encouraged; considers that all these rural development measures should remain co- financed, with an increased budget if necessary;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 732 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 a (new)
60 a. Believes that research and new technology must be further promoted and applied, if a sustainable use of natural resources is to be ensured;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI