Activities of Philippe JUVIN related to 2015/2346(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Non-tariff barriers in the Single Market (A8-0160/2016 - Daniel Dalton) FR
Amendments (12)
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Realises that despite the removal of tariff barriers since 1 July 1968, the free movement of goods and services has continued to be hampered by non-tariff barriers (NTBs) such as nationalre are still non-tariff barriers (NTBs) to the free movement of goods and services, such as national regulatory and non-regulatory technical rules and requirements governing products and service providers;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the objective of the Union should be the eventual abolition of NTBs where they cannot be justified or are disproportionate;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that extended non-compliance with Union law by Member States is detrimental for the single market; considers also that the slow compliancetransposition process leads to some Member States benefiting from an undue prolongation of the transpositioncompliance deadline;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that inconsistent enforcement of existing correctly transposed rules causes the same harm as slowlate transposition; considers that compliance and enforcement are made more challenging when commonly used definitions are given different meanings in different pieces of legislation;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that unequal application of the same rules in different Member States has the potential to create new NTBs; considers that the Commission should hold transposition workshops should be held in order to minimise divergences at an early stage;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Draws attention to the low levels of cross-border public procurement, with less than 20 % of all public procurement in the Union publicised on pan-European platforms;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to focus on ground-level enforcement, making sure that rules are followed in the Member States;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to act decisively to improve the application of mutual recognition; anticipates, in that context, the Commission’s plans to increase awareness and reviseof the Mutual Recognition Regulation with a view to revising, where appropriate, the existing guidance documents;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Draws attention to the problems for service providers, especially in business services and construction, stemming from multiple unjustified or disproportionate requirements concerning authorisations, registration or prior notification requirements;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Draws attention also to the unjustified or disproportionate restrictions in some Member States as regards the legal form of service providers and their shareholding or management structure, and as regards unjustified or disproportionate restrictions on the joint exercise of the profession; considers that these restrictions are serious obstacles to cross-border service provision;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to address these barriers, including through improved mutual recognition and, if appropriate, by taking legislative action, such as the Commission’s recently announced Services Passport initiative; stresses that it is important to ensure that the Services Passport is coordinated with the European professional card;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Points out that many of the Member States’ regulations on the access and exercise of regulated professions arethe existence of unjustified or disproportionate and createrules maintains unnecessary regulatory obstacles to the mobility of professionals;