15 Amendments of Philippe JUVIN related to 2017/0086(COD)
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) This Regulation should build on the eIDAS Regulation26, which lays down conditions under which Member States recognise certain means of electronic identification for natural and legal persons falling under a notified electronic identification scheme of another Member State. From the date of application of that rRegulation it should be possible for users to use their electronic identification and authentication means in order to operate on a cross-border basis and interact electronically with competent authorities. This Regulation should guarantee technological neutrality as regards electronic identification and authentication systems. _________________ 26 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73–114).
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In some instances, the user may be required to submit evidence to prove facts that cannot be established by online means, such as medical certificates and proof of the roadworthiness of motor vehicles. As long as the evidence to prove such facts can be submitted in electronic format, this should not constitute an exception to the principle that a procedure should be offered fully online. In other instances, given the current state of technical development, it may still be necessary for users of an online procedure to appear in person before a competent authority as part of the online procedure, in particularsuch as in the case of requesting or renewing passports or identity cards containing biometric data. Any such exception should not be discriminatory and should be limited to situations where no digital technology exists to achieve the purpose of completing the procedure. online and where it is absolutely necessary for the Member States to implement strict, indispensable, objectively justified and proportionate measures. This may, for example, be in the interest of public policy, general security, public health and the fight against fraud. In such exceptional cases, Member States should limit the physical presence of the user to what is strictly necessary. Any such exceptions should be notified to the Commission and should be discussed regularly and carefully reviewed for an improvement in the situation in the gateway coordination group together with good national practices and technical developments that would facilitate the further digitalisation of procedures.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Furthermore, the Member States and the Commission may decide to add other national assistance or problem solving services, provided by competent authorities or by private andor semi-private entities or public bodies, such as chambers of commerce, including bilateral chambers of commerce, or non- governmental assistance services for citizens, under the conditions set out in this Regulation. In principle, competent authorities should be responsible for assisting citizens and businesses with any queries they have in relation to applicable rules and procedures that cannot be fully addressed by online services. However, in very specialised areas and where the service provided by private or semi-private bodies meets the users’ needs, Member States can propose to the Commission to include such services in the gateway, provided that they meet all conditions set out in the Regulation and do not duplicate the assistance or problem solving services already included.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
Recital 40 a (new)
(40a) The system set up should secure user data against hacking and cyber- attacks.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and should be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles, including where data protection and the protection of privacy are concerned.
Amendment 209 #
1. Member States shall ensure that where a procedure, referred to in Article 2(2)(a) and (b), established at national level, can be accessed and completed online by users of that Member State, it can be also accessed and completed by users of other Member States in a non- discriminatory way.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Where, in exceptional cases such as in the interest of public policy, general security, public health and the fight against fraud, the objective pursued by a given procedure, referred to in paragraph 2, cannot be fully achieved withoutonline, Member States may requiringe the user to appear in person before the competent authority at some stage of the procedurefor a procedural step. In these exceptional cases, Member States shall limit such physical presence to what is strictly necessary and objectively justified and shall ensure that other steps of the procedure can be completed fully online. In implementing these requirements which require physical presence, Member States should ensure, that they are non- discriminatory. They shall notify such exceptions forthwith to the Commission and the single digital gateway coordination group and duly justify them.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) any exception with regard to the duty of Member States to make the procedures under Article 5 fully available online, with each exception having to be supplemented by a reasonable explanation of how those restrictions meet the criteria of absolute necessity and objective justification.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) users are able to access and receive instructions for completing the procedure in at least onell official languages of the Union other than the national language or, where applicable, the national languages;
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) users are able to access and receive instructions for completing the procedure in at least onfive official languages of the Union other than the national language or, where applicable, the national languages;
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) users are able to access and receive instructions for completing the procedure in at least one officialworking language of the Union other than the national language or, where applicable, the national languagesCommission;
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. The evidence made available by a competent authority shall be strictly limited to what has been requested and shall only be used by the receiving authority for the purpose of the procedure for which the evidence was exchanged. The competent authorities concerned should process all personal data of users in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) work towards a merger of existing information portals.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I –Areas of information related to businesses – table – area 1: Starting, running and closing a business – indent 8 a (new)
Annex I –Areas of information related to businesses – table – area 1: Starting, running and closing a business – indent 8 a (new)
• relocating a business from one Member State to another Member State
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation
ANNEX II – table
ANNEX II – table