7 Amendments of Mario PIRILLO related to 2009/2153(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5a (new)
Citation 5a (new)
5a. having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 January 2002 on the Council's final common position with a view to the adoption of the decision of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the sixth Community action programme on the environment;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Ba (new)
Recital Ba (new)
Ba. whereas Directive 99/31/EC on the landfill of waste does not provide sufficient instruments for the sustainable management of organic waste,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the management of such waste should be structured in line with the 'waste hierarchy': prevention and reduction, reuse, recycling, other types of recovery, in particular for energy purposes, and as the last option, landfilling (in accordance with Article 4 of the Waste Framework Directive); whereas prevention is the priority objective in the management of bio-waste; whereas prevention makes it possiseparate collection enables, in particular, to avoid food waste and greenhe optimal management of certain types of waste, i.e. kitchen waste and biodegradable and compostable waste, for example through the improved planning of public parkrom restaurants employing single-use crockery items, as well as better management of parks and gardens with low-maintenance plants and trees,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Ga (new)
Recital Ga (new)
Ga. whereas composting organic waste enables the recycling of the biodegradable and compostable products already covered by a Community initiative (the Lead Market Initiative),
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas it is important to have a mandatory separate collection system, except where separating bio-waste from other types of waste would not be viable from thethe available studies and experience in the Member States show that separate collection is both practicable and environmentally and economic point of view (in particular where the logistics of separate collection do not make it possible to prevent bio-waste from being contaminated with other types of waste or polluting substances, or where separate collection infrastructure is not environmentally justified in rural or sparsely populated areas),ally sustainable; believes that separate collection should be made compulsory;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Oa (new)
Recital Oa (new)
Oa. whereas anaerobic digestion via the production of high-quality compost is an efficient means of energy recovery;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Urges the Commission to review the legislation applicable to bio-waste with a view, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, to drawing up a proposal for a specific directive by the end of 2010; to drawing up a proposal for a specific directive by the end of 2010, to include the following; - compulsory separate collection arrangements in the Member States; - recycling of biodegradable products; - a quality-based classification of the different types of compost deriving from organic waste; - quantification under the National Emissions Plans of the CO2 reductions obtained from recycling and composting organic waste;