BETA

22 Amendments of Paolo DE CASTRO related to 2016/2100(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular Articles 39, 42 and 101 to 109 thereof,
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls for the establishment of a European observatory for food and agricultural prices at origin and at destination; draws attention to the Spanish origin-destination price index IPOD as a possible model for monitoring potential abuses by retailers of farmers and consumers;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Deplores the major differences arising on the market between producer prices and final prices, which are penalising both farmers and producers;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that producer organisations, in all their various forms, and European quality certification schemes are of key importance in giving farmers the wherewithal to face up to competition; calls on the Commission to improve the support arrangements for producer organisations and to ensure the continued recognition of quality certification schemes;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Believes that the unique nature of the olive oil sector calls for measures to strengthen the bargaining power of producers so as it results in a fairer distribution of the added value along the supply chain.
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Underlines the opportunities deriving from the provisions of the CMO Regulation concerning the contractual negotiations in the olive oil sector;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Calls on the Commission to identify new means aimed at increasing the dimension of producer organisations and encouraging the creation of APOs in the olive oil sector, as preconditions to strengthen their bargaining power;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Believes that the market of olive oil for consumers should be considered as a single market, and that a relevant- market categorisation based on the geographical origin, commercial use and type of the product, does not suit the current situation of the sector.
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Believes that, given the variations in the olive oil production due mostly to weather conditions, and in order to guarantee the objectives of the PO or APO's members, cases where POs are forced to purchase olive oil from non- members should be taken into consideration, while guaranteeing the ancillary nature of this activity to the marketing of the products of their own members.
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for further simplification of rules affecting the competitiveness of the farming industry, in keeping with the Horizon 2020 approach, with a view to fostering the emergence of innovative projects establishing links between the various stakeholders - from farmers to high-calibre researchers - in the process of modernising the industry as a whole;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes rules on the traceability and origin of raw materials and on food labelling to be of the utmost importance with a view to establishing a system that can ensure there is no unfair competition;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Is particularly concerned by the situation in the dairy sector, where retailers have been imposing prices well below costs following the end of the quota system;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5 a (new)
Agriculture and the Agri-food sector
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Emphasizes that Article 42 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) accords a special status to the agricultural sector with regard to the application of competition law;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Recalls that the most recent reform of the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) sought to strengthen the position of farmers in the food supply chain through a series of derogations and exemptions from the provisions of Article 101 TFEU;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 346 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Believes that the current crisis situation in farming worsens the already weak position of farmers in the food supply chain and calls for fresh initiatives to ensure that competition policy takes better account of the specific nature of agriculture;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Finds it regrettable that, despite the publication of guidelines on the application of the specific rules set out in Articles 169, 170 and 171 of the Single CMO regulation1b , the scope of the current derogations remains unclear, difficult to implement and unevenly applied by national competition authorities; __________________ 1bRegulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007.
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20e. Calls on the Commission to broaden its approach in terms of criteria for determining whether an agricultural undertaking, or a number of such undertakings linked by a horizontal agreement, is deemed to be in a 'dominant position', taking into consideration the degree of concentration and the constraints resulting from bargaining power from upstream and downstream sectors;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 f (new)
20f. Considers that the collective activities of producer organisations and their associations, such as production planning and sales negotiation, are necessary for achieving the aims of the CAP and that they should benefit from a presumption of compatibility with Articles 39 and 101 TFEU;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 g (new)
20g. Believes that full and satisfactory implementation of the 'Milk Package'1a is essential in order to strengthen the dairy sector and asks the Commission to propose that the 'Milk Package' should continue to apply beyond mid-2020 and to examine whether its rules could be extended to other sectors of agriculture; __________________ 1aRegulation (EU) No261/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards contractual relations in the milk and milk products sector.
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 h (new)
20h. Calls on the Commission and the national competition authorities to address the concerns raised by the cumulative impact – particularly at the upper end of the food supply chain – of, on the one hand, national-level concentration in the retail sector and, on the other, the development of European- level alliances of major distributors;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 i (new)
20i. Takes note of the conclusions of the study "Economic impact of modern retail on choice and innovation in the EU food sector" of the Directorate General Competition, including the existence of a negative relationship that may exists between innovation and penetration of products under private labels on the food market; calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament the extent of the on- going discussions to determine whether this negative relationship does reduce innovation and variety of products available to consumers and what would be their long-term consequences for the supply chain and on the situation of farmers;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON