3 Amendments of Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU related to 2012/2205(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of the comments made by the Court of Auditors regarding the lack of procedures for exceptions, the not yet fully validated accounting system, the room for improvement regarding procurement procedures, the not yet adopted detailed rules and procedures to implement Europol's financial regulation, the non- inclusion of provisions on dilapidation costs of the new building, the weaknesses found as regards the physical verification and recording of assets before and after the move to the new headquarters, the room for improving the transparency of recruitment procedures as well as the high percentage of staff who carried over annual leave in excess of 12 days to the following year which can only be done in exceptional circumstances; welcomacknowledges Europol's replies on these comments and the improvements announced by Europol; calls on Europol to improve its management in order to reduce the amount of comments by the Court of Auditors in next year's report;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Is concerned about the high amount of critical comments made by the Court of Auditors, covering a lot of different issues. Requests the agency to provide the discharge authority with a detailed action plan that addresses the deficiencies reported by the Court of Auditors;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Generally considers that there should beinvites the European Court of Auditors to further focus on auditing the Europol's sound financial management of Europol, namely the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which Europol has used its appropriations in carrying out its responsibilities.