BETA

45 Amendments of Paulo RANGEL related to 2011/0359(COD)

Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The provision of services other than statutory audit to audited entities by statutory auditors, audit firms or members of their networks may compromise their independence. Therefore, it is appropriate to require the statutory auditor, the audit firm and the members of their network not to provide non-audit services to their audited entities. The provision of non- audit services by an audit firm to a company would prevent that audit firm from carrying out statutory audit of that company, thus resulting in a reduction of the audit firms available to provide statutory audit, in particular with regard to the audit of large public-interest entities where the market is concentrated. As a result, in order to secure that a minimum number of audit firms is able to provide audit services to large public- interest entities, it is appropriate to request that audit firms of significant dimension focus their professional activity on the carrying out of statutory audit and are not allowed to undertake other services unconnected to their statutory audit function such as consultancy or advisory servicgiven services to their audited entities.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) In order to address the familiarity threat and therefore reinforce the independence of auditors and audit firms, it is important to establish a maximum duration of the audit engagement of a statutory auditor or audit firm in a particular audited entity. An appropriate gradual rotation mechanism should also be established with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including the key audit partners carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm. It is also important to provide for an appropriate period within which such statutory auditor or audit firm may not carry out the statutory audit of the same entity. In order to ensure a smooth transition, the former auditor should transfer a handover file with relevant information to the incoming auditorgradual rotation should be ensured with regard to the most senior personnel involved in the statutory audit, including the key audit partners carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) In order to ensure legal certainty and the smooth transition to the regime introduced by this Regulation, it is important to introduce a transitional regime regarding the entry into force of the obligation to rotate audit firms, the obligation to organise a selection procedure for the choice of audit firm and the conversion of audit firms into firms that only provide audit services.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. When the statutory auditor or audit firm provides to the audited entity related financial audit services, as referred to in Article 10(2), the fees for such services shall be limited to no more than 10% of the fees paid by the audited entity for the statutory audit.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A statutory auditor or an audit firm carrying out statutory audit of public- interest entities may provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings statutory audit services and related financial audit services, and non-audit services not prohibited under this Article.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the statutory auditor belongs to a network, a member of such a network may provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings within the Union statutory audit services or related financial audit services and non-audit services not prohibited under this Article.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
A statutory auditor or an audit firm carrying out statutory audit of public- interest entities shall not directly or indirectly provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings prohibited non-audit services.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where the statutory auditor belongs to a network, no member of such a network shall provide to the audited entity, to its parent undertaking and to its controlled undertakings within the Union any prohibited non- audit services.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
For the purposes of this Article, prohibited non-audit services shall mean:
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point i
(i) expert services unrelated to the audit, tax consultancy, general management and other advisory services;deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iii
(iii) designing and implementing internal control or risk management proceduresystems related to the preparation and/or control of financing information included in the financial statements and advice on riskconstituting a significant part of the internal review of the audited entity’s financial reporting or giving rise to information significant to the accounting records or of statutorily audited financial statements;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point iv
(iv) valuation services, providing fairness opinions or contribuservices for the valuation of assets or financial liabilities constituting materially relevant amounts in the context of financial statements and whose valuation- in-kind reportsvolves a high degree of subjectivity;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point vi
(vi) designing and implementing financial information technology systems for public- interest entities as referred to in Article 2(13)(b) to (j) of Directive 2006/43/EC, except where the audited entity is responsible for the internal control system as a whole or the service is provided in accordance with specifications which the audited entity has laid down;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – point viii
(viii) broker or dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services.ted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point i
(i) human resources services, including recruiting related to senior management;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point ii
(ii) providing comfort letters for investors in the context of the issuance of an undertaking’s securities;deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point iii
(iii) designing and implementing financial information technology systems for public-interest entities as referred to in Article 2(13)(a) of Directive 2006/43/EC;deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point iv
(iv) due diligence services to the vendor or the buy side on potential mergers and acquisitions and providing assurance on the audited entity to other parties at a financial or corporate transaction.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
A statutory auditor or audit firm may provide non-audit services other than services prohibited under paragraph 3 of this Article where the provision of those services has been approved by the audit committee and the competent authority has not exercised its power to prohibit the provision of the services in question.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
By derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, the services mentioned in point (b)(iii) and (iv) may be provided by the statutory auditor or the audit firm, subject to prior approval by the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1).deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5
By derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, the services mentioned in point (b)(i) and (ii) may be provided by the statutory auditor or the audit firm, subject to prior approval by the audit committee as referred to in Article 31 of this Regulation.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Being involved in the decision-taking of the audited entity and the provision of the services referred to in points (ii) and (iii) of paragraph 3(a) shall be considered as affecting such independence in all cases.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
The provision of the services referred to in points (i) and (iv) to (viii) of paragraph 3(a) shall be presumed to affect such independence.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Where an audit firm generates more than one third of its annual audit revenues from large public-interest entities and belongs to a network whose members have combined annual audit revenues which exceed EUR 1 500 million within the European Union, it shall comply with the following conditions: (a) it shall not directly or indirectly provide to any public interest entity non- audit services; (b) it shall not belong to a network which provides non-audit services within the Union; (c) any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3 shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5% of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; (d) the entities which provide the services listed in paragraph 3shall not directly or indirectly hold together more than 10% of the capital or of the voting rights in the audit firm; (e) such audit firm shall not directly or indirectly hold more than 5% of the capital or of the voting rights in any entity which provides the services listed in paragraph 3.deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 68 for the purpose of adapting the list of related financial audit services referred to in paragraph 2 and the list of prohibited non-audit services referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. When using such powers, the Commission shall take into account developments in auditing and the audit profession.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) request permission from the audit committee to provide the non-audit services referred to in Article 10(3)(b)(i) and (iinon-audit services other than non-audit services prohibited under Article 10(3) to the audited entity;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) request permission from the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) to provide the non-audit services referred to in Article 10(3)(b)(iii) and (iv) to the audited entity;deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point q
(q) declare that the prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 10(3) were not provided and that the statutory auditor(s) or the audit firm(s) remained completely independent in conducting the audit. Where the statutory audit was carried out by an audit firm, the report shall identify each member of the audit engagement team and shall state that all members remained completely independent and had no direct or indirect interest in the audited entity;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point r
(r) indicate the non-audit services other than those referred to in Article 10(3)(b)(i) and (ii) that the audit committee allowed the statutory auditor or the audit firm to provide to the audited entity;
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point s
(s) indicate the non-audit services referred to in Article 10(3)(b)(iii) and (iv) that the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) allowed the statutory auditor or the audit firm to provide to the audited entity;deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) include a declaration of independence as provided for in point (q) of Article 22(2);
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The annual financial report and the annual income statement shall show the total turnover divided into fees from the statutory audit of annual and consolidated financial statements of public-interest entities and entities belonging to a group of undertakings whose parent undertaking is a public-interest entity, fees from the statutory audit of annual and consolidated financial statements of other entities and fees charged for related financial audit services as defined in Article 10(2)nd non-audit services, with the exception of prohibited non-audit services.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 5 – point f
f) authorise, on a case by case basis, the provision by the statutory auditor or audit firm of the non-audit services referred to in Article 10(3)(b)(i) and (ii) of this Regulation to the audited entity.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The public-interest entity may renew this engagement only once.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The maximum duration of the combined two engagements shall not exceed 6 years.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where throughout a continuous engagement of 6 years two statutory auditors or audit firms have been appointed, the maximum duration of the engagement of each statutory auditor or audit firm shall not exceed 9 years.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. After the expiry of the maximum duration of the engagement referred to in paragraph 1, the statutory auditor or audit firm or any members of its network within the Union, where applicable, shall not undertake the statutory audit of the public-interest entity concerned until a period of at least four years has elapsed.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, on an exceptional basis the public-interest entity may request the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) to grant an extension to re-appoint the statutory auditor or audit firm for an additional engagement. In case of appointment of two statutory auditors or audit firms, this third engagement shall not exceed three years. In case of appointment of one statutory auditor or audit firm, this third engagement shall not exceed two years.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e
e) common standards and best practices on the gradual rotation mechanism referred to in Article 33;Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70
[...]Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 3
However, Article 32(7) shall apply from […] [the date of the entry into force of the Regulation] and Article 10(5) shall apply from […] [3 years after the entry into force of the Regulation].
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part I – subpart A – point 5
5. The statutory auditor or audit firm infringes Article 9(2) by not ensuring that related financial audit services provided to the audited entity do not exceed 10% of the fees paid by the audited entity for the statutory audit.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part I – subpart A – point 6
6. The statutory auditor or audit firm infringes Article 10 by providing services other than statutory audit services which are prohibited or related financial audit services to the audited entity.
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 744 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part I – subpart E – point 23
23. The statutory auditor or audit firm infringes Article 33(2) by undertaking the statutory audit of the public–interest entity after the expiry of the two consecutive engagements referred to in Article 33(1) before the period of four years has elapsed.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part II – subpart A – point 3
3. A public-interest entity infringes Article 33 by employing the same statutory auditor or audit firm for a period longer than the one referred to in Article 33.Deleted
2012/11/09
Committee: JURI