6 Amendments of Paulo RANGEL related to 2011/2275(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the implementation of the tools for the management of cases related to the application of EU law (CHAP and EU Pilot) and the positive results they are producing and calls on the Commission to continue to develop them and improve its functioning;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Regrets, however, the enormous number of non-communication cases (470 pending in 2010);
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that European legal training is a key instrument to ensure the correct application of EU law and welcomes the Commission's initiative to prepare a Communication on this subject;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Draws attention to the direct applicability of provisions of directives when they are sufficiently precise and unconditional (‘direct effect’), suggests that the Commission refer to such provisions in its justification for a directive and is of the opinion that the legal profession should be made more aware of themaccording to the consolidated case law of the Court of Justice;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to evaluate in each single case whether, in view of the enormous number of non-communication cases (470 pending in 2010), the choice of a regulation instead of a directive is more appropriate; notes that this would at the same time resolvegive preferential use to regulations, whenever possible under the Treaties and the probinciplem of Member States going beyond the standards required by a directive, entailing a protectionist effect (‘gold-plating’)subsidiarity;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to act jointly and consistently to tackle the problem of 'gold-plating';