6 Amendments of Paulo RANGEL related to 2016/2005(ACI)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the new IIA is without prejudice to the 2010 Framework Agreement, in accordance with the declaration of the European Parliament and the Commission set out in Annex II, the new IIA is without prejudice to the 2010 Framework Agreement, which should therefore be amended and/or adapted only where strictly necessary following the entry into force of the new IIA, with the aim of appropriately safeguarding the European Parliament’s position and prerogatives;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the letter of 15 December 2015 from the First Vice President of the Commission on the functioning of the new Regulatory Scrutiny Board, which is to oversee the quality of the Commission's impact assessments; points out that the legislators may also carry out their own impact assessments where they consider this necessary; underlines that, furthermore, the new IIA provides for exchanges of information between the institutions on best practice and methodologies relating to impact assessments, thus providing an opportunity tofor the three institutions to reach agreement on a common methodology and review the functioning of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board in due time;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Acknowledges that the agreed measures to improve the mutual exchange of views and information between Parliament and the Council in their capacity as legislators constitute a step forward, but; considers, however, that they do not yet establishshould be developed further, particularly in terms of mutual access to information and meetings, so as to ensure a truly equal balance and equal treatment between the legislators throughout the legislative procedure in terms of mutual access to information and meetings, and to guarantee that the principle of mutual sincere cooperation among institutions is complied with; warns that the agreed informal exchanges of views should not develop into a new arena of non- transparent interinstitutional negotiations;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the commitment to ensure transparency of legislative procedures, but underlines the need for more concrete provisions and tools to achieve this, in particular as regards the use of first- reading agreements;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Also believes that more concrete arrangements are needed in order to enhance the political dialogue with national parliaments; highlights, in this connection, the important role given to national parliaments in the Lisbon Treaty and stresses that, alongside the role which they play in monitoring respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, they can and do make positive contributions in the framework of the political dialogue;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for a comprehensive evaluation of the impact that the new IIA will have on the 2010 Framework Agreement and other related existing interinstitutional agreements, bearing in mind the need for simplification ofto safeguard the European Parliament's position and prerogatives and simplify the architecture of the numerous arrangements regulating interinstitutional relations;