BETA

5 Amendments of Paulo RANGEL related to 2017/2089(INI)

Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the dichotomy between rights and principles enshrined in Articles 51 and 52 of the Charter is unclear and risks undermining the very essence of the Charter itself, and weakens, at the same time, the principle of the interdependence of human rights;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the transparency of the EU legislative and decision-making processes isis both a corollary of the right to good administration, as set out in Article 41, and an essential precondition for citizens to be able to assess and properly monitor the implementation of the Charter by the EU institutions;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the procedures established by the EU institutions to assess the compatibility of legislative proposals with the Charter are mainly of an internal nature; stresses the need to provide for enhanced forms of consultation, impact assessments and legal scrutiny with the full involvement of independent fundamental rights experts; calls on the Commission to promote structured and regulated cooperation with independent external bodies, such as the FRA and civil society organisations working in the field, whenever a legislative file potentially promotes or negatively affects fundamental rights;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Is convinced that the current dualism characterising Article 51 of the Charter in relation to rights and principles, as well as the differences in the application of the provisions of the Charter between EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies ofadded value of the Charter lies both in respect for a body of rights and in observance and advocacy of the principles which the Charter has established; considers that the obligations laid down in Article 51 make for the widest ranging protection of fundamental rights in the Union and thein Member States, is detrimental to the added value brought by the Charter, namely that of enabling them to be applied morep resenting a set of common minimum standards of protection to be applied horizontally to all institutional actors and policies and activities connected to the EU spheradily and effectively to the circumstances at every point in time;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Encourages the EU institutions and the Member States to move toward a more flexible and unconstrained interpretation of Article 51 of the Charter, allowing for a straightforward application of the Charter as a whole, and to evaluate the possibility of repealing the article in the event of a possible future revision of the Treaties;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFCO