11 Amendments of Gaston FRANCO related to 2013/0340(NLE)
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33 a (new)
Recital 33 a (new)
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires that nuclear installations arbe designed, sited, constructed, commissioned, operated and decommissioned with the objective of avoiding potential radioactive releasespreventing accidents and, should an accident occur, mitigating its effects and avoiding large, long term, off-site contamination by:
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 71/2009/Euratom
Article 8 a – paragraph 2
Article 8 a – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires that the objectives set out in paragraph 1 applies toy to new reactors and shall be considered as a target for existing nuclear installations to the extent reasonably achievable.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 1
Article 8e – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall at least every ten years arrange for periodic self-assessments of their national framework and competent regulatory authorities and invite an international peer review of relevant segments of their national framework and competent regulatory authorities with the aim of continuously improving nuclear safety. Outcomes of any peer review shall be reported to the Member States and the Commission, when availablemade public.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 71/2009/Euratom
Article 8e– paragraph 2 – point a
Article 8e– paragraph 2 – point a
(a) jointly and in close coordination with the Commission select one or more specific topics related to the nuclear safety of nuclear installations. Should Member States fail to jointly select at least a topic within the time frame specified in this paragraph, the Commission shall select the topics to be the subject of the peer reviews;
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) based on these topicsassess to what extent these topics have been addressed and, if need be, perform in close collaboration with licence holders, national assessments of their installations, to be evaluated by the competent regulatory authority, and publish the results;
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) jointly define a methodology, arrange and carry out a peer review of the results of the national assessments referred to in point (b), to which the Commission is invited to participate as an observer;
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) jointly define a methodology, arrange and carry out a peer review of the results of the national assessments referred to in point (b), to which the Commission is invited to participate as an observer;
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 3
Article 8e – paragraph 3
3. Each Member State subject to the peer review referred to in paragraph 2 shall arrange for the planning and mode of implementation on its territory of relevant technical recommendations resulting from the peer-review process and shall inform the Commission thereofpublish an action plan reflecting the steps taken.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 4
Article 8e – paragraph 4
4. Should the Commission identify substantial deviations or delays iEach Member State subject to the peer review shall make available to other Member States, the Commission and the public a follow-up report on the implementation of the technical recommendations resulting fromafter the peer review process, the Commission shall invite the competent regulatory authorities of Member States not concerned to organise and carry out a verification mission to get a full picture of the situation and inform the Member State concerned about possible measures to remedy any identified shortcomings. If appropriate, a follow- up peer review shall then be organised under the same procedures as those described in paragraph 2 and its conclusions should be made public.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 5
Article 8e – paragraph 5
5. In case of an accident which leads to an early or large release or an abnormal event, the consequences of which leading to situations that would require off-site emergency measures or protecting measures for the public, the Member State concerned shall invite within six months a peer review of the installation concerned in accordance with paragraph 2, and to which the Commission shall be invited to participate as an observer.