11 Amendments of Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI related to 2011/0901B(COD)
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) As a consequence of the progressive expansion of its jurisdiction since its creation, the number of cases before the General Court has been steadilycould increasinge over the years, resulting over time in an increase in the number of cases pending before that Court. This haswould have an impact on the duration of proceedings.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Taking into account the likely evolution of the workload of the General Court, the number of Judges should be fixed at 56 at the end of a three-stage process, it being understood that at no point of time can there be more than two Judges sitting at the General Court appointed upon a proposal by the same Member State40.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The appointment of additional judges should be based on their independence, impartiality and expertise, taking account of their professional and personal suitability and their knowledge of the legal systems of the European Union and of the Member States, and ensuring, furthermore, gender balance in the overall composition of the Court.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Protocol No 3
Article 48
Article 48
(2) Article 48 is replaced by the following : "Article 48 The General Court shall consist of: (a) 40 Judges as from …*; (b) 47 Judges as from 1 September 2016; (c) one Judge per Member State and 12 additional Judges. There shall be no more than two Judges perfor any Member State as from 1 September 2019.". __________________ * OJ: insert "1 September 2015", or the date of entry into force of this Regulation if that date is after 1 September 2015. All Judges shall have the same status and the same rights and obligations.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – point 2 – point a
Protocol No 3
Article 48
Article 48
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Protocol No 3
Article 48
Article 48
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – point 2 – point c
Protocol No 3
Article 48
Article 48
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Protocol No 3
Article 48 a (new)
Article 48 a (new)
(2a) The following article is inserted: “Article 48a In respect of the Judges to be appointed per Member State, the right of nomination shall lie with the government of the Member State in question.'
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 b (new)
Article 1 – point 2 b (new)
Protocol No 3
Article 48b (new)
Article 48b (new)