BETA

Activities of Derek VAUGHAN related to 2016/2152(DEC)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section I – European Parliament PDF (717 KB) DOC (110 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2016/2152(DEC)
Documents: PDF(717 KB) DOC(110 KB)

Amendments (26)

Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the annual report of the internal auditor contains findings based on specific audit work but does not by itself provide a comprehensive picture of the Parliament’s budgetary and financial management; notes, similarly,; notes that the Court’s report only represents the results of a small sample (16 transactions) in respect of Parliament’s transactions;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that for such a thorough analysis of the accounts it is essential to have special in-house expertise on accounts and auditing that rapporteurs can make use of in the preparation of their discharge reports; considers that in this respect national parliaments have created special supportive units for their members, such as the Parliamentary Bureau for Research and Public Expenditure of the Parliament of the Netherlands;deleted
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls upon the secretary-general to create a similar supportive unit in the Parliament, for example, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (DG EPRS);deleted
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that four chapters accounted for 71 % of total of the commitments: Chapter 10 (Members of the institution), Chapter 12 (Officials and temporary staff), Chapter 20 (Buildings and associated costs) and Chapter 42 (Expenditure relating to parliamentary assistance); notes that this indicates that Parliament’s expenditure is characterised by a high level of rigidcontinuity for the major part linked to remunerations for MEPs and staff, adjusted according to the staff regulations and other contractual obligations;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Is concerned with the Court’s finding that of the 151 transactions examined for all the Union institutions, 22 (14,6 %) were affected by error; notes however that of these 22 transactions, only seven errors were quantified and thus had financial implications, resulting in an estimated level of error of 0,6 %;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Welcomes that this reduces considerably cash payments and introduces mandatory electronic transfers therefore reducing the risks of theft and reputation for the Parliament while still providing for considerable flexibility; takes note of the Bureau’s intention to evaluate the revised system after one year of implementation; regrets, however, that Parliamentary Assistants can be nominated to receive payments into their personal accounts and certify the group's expenses; is concerned this places unnecessary financial and legal responsibility and potential risk on APAs; urges the Bureau to reconsider this as a priority;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Welcomes that the attention of the media and the public at large for the Parliament and its administration is increasing, but is concerned that journalists find it difficult to obtain the specific information they are looking for, as is evident, for example, in the court case introduced on 13 November 2016 by journalists from all Union countries, following the refusal by the Parliament to disclose records about MEP's allowances;deleted
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls in this regard on the bureau to publish on the Parliament’s website the documents submitted to it by the secretary- general, as soon as they become available, unless the nature of the information contained therein makes this impossible, for example, for the protection of personal dwhere justified and appropriatae;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Believes that MEPs ought to be able to use the Parliament’s website to provide their constituencies with maximumthe greatest possible transparency on their activities and therefore calls upon the secretary- general to develop a system in which MEPs can indicate how they want their personal webpages to be organised; refers, in this respect, to the wish of certain MEPs to have their diaries and, in particular,publish their meetings with interest representatives, included on these webpages,; and urges the secretary-general to make this possible without further delays, as already requested in Parliament’s 2014 discharge resolution;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the bureau to make it Notes that it is already possible for MEPs who wish to do so, to have their accounts relating to the general expenditure allowance audited by the Parliament’s administration in a manner that is both efficient and effective (for example, by taking samples or by concentrating on expenditures over a certain financial threshold) and to publish the results on their personal webpages on the Parliament’s website; alternatively, to earmark a percentage of the general expenditure allowance for MEPs to hire an external auditclaim audit expenses as an eligible cost relating to the GEA;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Notes the low awareness amongst MEPs of the possibility of returning general expenditure allowance surpluses; asks the secretary-general to publicise this as a priority; urges MEPs to return surpluses;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Calls on the secretary-general to ensureNotes that the accounts of the political groups are easilynd of NI are accessible on the Parliament’s website in a format that allows for quick and easy searches;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 – introductory part
42. Is concerned that the current code of conduct for MEPs does not offer sufficient safeguardmay require further improvements in order to avoid conflicts of interests and expresses the need for the establishment of a working group on the strengthening of the code of conduct in respect of, inter alia,paying specific attention to the following issues:
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 – indent 3
oversight over the registration of declarations of MEPs’ interests;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
44. Supports the various programmes aimed at facilitating visits by journalists and citizens at large who are interested in finding out more on Parliament’s activities;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Is, however, not convinced ofExpresses concern about the effectiveness of Pthe parliament's communication strategy; in respect of those who are not automatically interested in Parliament’s activities or are even sceptical about its functioning; invites the secretary-general to develop a new strategy to reach also thesvites the secretary-general to launch a comprehensive review of the current strategy to evaluate citizens and to concentrate in that respect less on “sending messages” than on facilitating access to information and on addressing unjustified prejudices againsts capacity to increase understanding and improve public perception of the Parliament;.
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Is not convinced of the need to have iInformation oOffices of the Parliament in all Member States, especially in view of the fact that for effective communication physical presence may not always be necessary and can easily be replaced by effective and responsive internet facilities; is in particular sceptical about having an information office in the cities of Brussels and Strasbourg as in both cit are currently best serving the interests of the Parliament; calls on the secretary-general to reviesw the Parliament itself can be visited and in addition for interested visitors there is or will be a Parlamentarium at their disposalir effectiveness as part of the aforementioned strategy;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67
67. Points out that in cases of harassment or whistle-blowing APAs are in a particularly vulnerable position, as their contracts are based on mutual trust between the MEP and the assistant; if this trust is lacking, that in itself is reason for terminating the contract; furthermore, if the MEP has to resign because of reputational damage as a consequence of harassment or other irregularities, this normally means that the contracts of all his/her assistants will also be terminated; calls therefore for the immediate strengthening of the representation of APAs in the advisory committee on harassment, as already requested in the context of the 2013 and 2014 discharge, ands; calls also for the possibility of financial compensatory measures, for example, by paying the APAs concAPAs to be considerned up to their salaries until the end of the term of Parliament, if their contracts are dissolved and the unemployment benefits do not offer full compensation of lost incomein the next revision of the Staff Regulation to ensure equal treatment of APAs and recognition of their particular vulnerability in cases of harassment or whistle-blowing;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67 b (new)
67b. Welcomes the intention of the administration to launch the process for adaptation of the flat rate allowances for Strasbourg missions received by APAs, which are significantly lower than those for permanent officials; emphasises that this adaptation should be based on transparent calculation methodology with a direct correlation to the recent upwards revision of allowances and accommodation ceilings for permanent officials; also emphasises that automatic indexation of the allowances for future revisions should be introduced;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67 a (new)
67a. Deeply regrets the fact that the employment period of an APA in the case of death or resignation of his or her Member ceases at the end of the calendar month; emphasises that this could mean that an APA would not have a single day of notice period if the Member's term of office happens to end on the final day of a given month; calls for this unacceptable situation to be resolved in the next revision of the Staff Regulation, by linking notice periods to a defined period of time, such as four weeks, rather than to calendar months; further calls on the Bureau to swiftly introduce temporary measures that could provide a provisional solution to this problem before the legal revision takes place;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
69. Notes with concern that no special 69. arrangements have been made for staff’s pensions in case of a Member State leaving the Union and that it is entirely at the discretion of the Member State concerned, whether and to what extent it will acknowledge the pension rights of Union staff of their nationality; while recognising that this issue holds for all European institutions, invites the secretary-general to engage in a dialogue with the Commission in order to make sure that British staff do not become victimised in the case of a Brexit and that their statutory, contractual and acquired rights are fully safeguarded;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82
82. Notes that in 2015 Parliament subsidised the European Parliamentary Association with an amount of EUR 200 000 and invites the secretary-general to submit suggestions on a revision of its policies in regard of this subsidy, taking into account that the Association could also usefully be funded by contributions by its members; points in this regard to the fact that the Association, inter alia, offers discounts at certain shops and its membership thus brings with it certain material gains for its members;deleted
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 92
92. Recognises that in accordance with the bureau decisions of 2013 and 2015, the new catering contracts do not foresee any direct subsidies from the Parliament’s budget; is concerned, however, that certain services are currentlywere offered at higher than market prices in 2015; refers in this respect to the coffee service during meetings, which comes at EUR 4 per cup; calls on the secretary-general to continue discussing the pricing policies of the caterers and to make sure that they do not charge higher- than-market prices for certain services; notes prices were revised in August 2016;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 94
94. Welcomes the continuous efforts to work onguarantee the safety in and around the premises of the buildings of the Parliament; acknowledges that safeecurity within the Parliament representails a delicate balancinge between achievensuring safety with a number of measures, and avoiding transforming its buildings into fortresses, which, as a side effect, may lead to anxiety for its usersand maintaining Parliament's image as an open and transparent institution;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 107
107. Emphasises nevertheless that the current system of internal and external controls is clearly insufficimay require improvement to avoid major irregularities; takes note of the declarations of the external accountant, EY, that its audits are aimed at obtaining a reasonable assurance that the annual accounts are free of material misstatements and that the entity has complied with in scope rules and regulations, and that they include examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the opinion; also notes, however, that the examinations do not include investigations of possible fraudulent statements and documents; that, therefore, the audits provide only for a superficial insight in the dealings of European political parties and foundations;
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112
112. Calls on the bureau to examine for the longer-term whether it is logical to have the responsibility for subsidies for European political parties and foundations attributed to the Parliament, whereas in most Member States subsidies for national political parties and foundations are administered by the ministry of the interior, since conflicts of interest may arise for bureau members representing political groups in Parliament who are affiliated with European political parties and foundations.deleted
2017/03/10
Committee: CONT