14 Amendments of Izaskun BILBAO BARANDICA related to 2018/0304(COD)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation, unless otherwise provided, applies to the activity of Union fishing vessels used or intended for use for the purposes of commercial fishing activities conducted on fisheries resources in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) Regulatory Area, as defined in the Annex I to the Convention8 and to the activities of NAFO vessels of another Contracting Party in a Member State port. _________________ 8 Council Decision 2010/717/EU, Council Decision of 8 November 2010 on the approval, on behalf of the European Union, of the Amendment to the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (OJ L 321, 7.12.2010, p.1). (Chapter VIII of this Regulation is devoted exclusively to the Port Control System of NAFO vessels from another Contracting Party and therefore it seems appropriate to include the reference to NAFO vessels of another Contracting Party in a Member State port in the scope. The same applies to the ‘activities of vessels’ since the obligations of the Contracting Parties and of the flag State fall within the scope.)
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. No less than fourteten days prior to the commencement of a fishery research period, the flag Member State shall: (Speed is of the essence where research is concerned so that excessively long notification deadlines should be avoided)
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The flag Member State shall immediately notify the CommissionNAFO Secretariat of the termination of research activities by any research vessel.where these are carried out by a fishing vessel occasionally used for scientific purposes. (This is consistent with the recommendation for the transposition of NAFO legislation)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The flag Member State shall notify the Commission of any changes to the Research Plan not less than fourteten days before the date these changes become effective. The research vessel shall maintain a record of the changes on board. (Speed is of the essence where research is concerned so that excessively long notification deadlines should be avoided)
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall ensure that all catch and/or effort limitations shall apply to stocks identified in fishing opportunities in force, and unless otherwise stated, all quotas shall be expressed as live weight, in metric tonnes.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) ensure that no more 3M redfish is retained onboard its vessels after the estimated date when 100 % of the 3M redfish TAC is taken, save where authorised by the CEM;
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) at least 48 hours before its estimated time of arrival in port, an authorized vessel or its representative on its behalf, shall advise the port’s competent portfisheries control authority of its estimated time of arrival, the estimated quantity of Greenland halibut retained onboard, and information on the division or divisions where the catches were taken;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) each Member State shall inspect each landing of Greenland halibut in its ports and prepare an inspection report in the format prescribed in Annex IV.C of the CEM, and send it to the Commission with the EFCA in copy, within 104 working days from the date on which the inspection was completed. The PSC-3 report shall identify and provide details of any infringement of the Regulation detected during the port inspection. It shall include all relevant information available in reference to infringements detected at sea during the current trip of the inspected fishing vessel. The Commission shall post the information to the NAFO MCS Website. (The deadline foreseen in the CEM is 14 days and not 10 days)
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) fill out the Surveillance Report Form set out in Annex IV.A of the CEM. Ifn the event that the inspector has been able to madke a volumetric or catch composition evaluation of the content of a haul, the Surveillance Report shall include all relevant information regarding the composition of the tow, and refer the method used for the volumetric evaluation;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) limit each inspection team to a maximum of fourtwo inspectors per Contracting Party including any inspection trainee who may accompany the inspection team for training purposes only. Where an inspection trainee accompanies the inspectors, inspectors shall, upon boarding, identify the trainee to the master. The inspection trainee shall simply observe the inspection operation conducted by the authorized inspectors and shall in no way interfere with the activities of the fishing vessel;
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) when comparing entries in the production logbook with entries in the fishing logbook the inspectors shall convert production weight into live weight guided by conversion factors used by the master;set out in Annexes XIII, XIV and XV of Regulation EU No 404/2011 pursuant to article 49 of said Regulation.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 4
Article 36 – paragraph 4
4. Where the serious infringement is mis-recording of catch, the full inspection shall ensure the physical inspection and enumeration of total catch on board, by species and Division. In view of the practical complications involved in the inspection by division in certain cases and times, the competent authority shall be empowered to derogate from this type of inspection subject to prior assessment of the situation and to written justification. (NAFO calls at port tend to be more common at certain times, and at times of the year when they may coincide with other landings that may significantly complicate the work in port.)
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 6
Article 36 – paragraph 6
6. Subject to the consent of the flag Member State and, if the port state NAFO Contracting Party is different, inspectors of another Contracting Party may participate in the full inspection and enumeration of the catch subject to prior invitation by the port state.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the list of prohibited activities of research vessels in Article 4(2);