BETA

7 Amendments of Birgit SIPPEL related to 2015/0125(NLE)

Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) In accordance with Article 78 (2) of the Treaty the Commission should propose to the European Parliament and the Council by the end of 2015 a permanent mechanism for administrating emergency measures in the case that one or more Member States are faced with an emergency situation, characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries to the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned.
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) When drafting the permanent mechanism for relocation under Article 78 (2) of the Treaty as an emergency measure, when one or more Member States are faced with an emergency situation, the Commission should provide a definition of the terms "sudden inflow of nationals of third countries" and "exceptional migratory pressure".
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) With regards of the expectations for an increased migratory pressure on other Member States on the external borders of the EU, the Commission should guarantee a display of solidarity through drawing up and implementation of a permanent mechanism for relocation under Article 78 (2) of the Treaty.
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) The temporary measures for relocation by the Commission are only one part of the future holistic policy on migration by creating legal ways for migration, integration programmes, cooperation with third countries and fighting trafficking.
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) In accordance with Article 78(2) of the Treaty the Commission should come up with a proposal for a permanent mechanism for relocation with strictly defined criteria.
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 27
(27) The appointment by Member States of liaison officers in Italy and Greece should facilitate the effective implementation of the relocation procedure, including the appropriate identification of the applicants to be relocated, taking into account in particular their vulnerability and qualifications and, as far as possible, their preferences.
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Consent of applicants or beneficiaries of international protection to relocation is an established principle in EU law, enshrined in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 and by analogy in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 439/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) and in Article 17(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, in case of use of the discretionary clauses in the Dublin procedure. According to Article 10 of this Decision, Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 is fully applicable to this Decision. Consent is of particular importance in case the preferences of an applicant cannot be taken into account. If applicants would be transferred to another Member State against their will, secondary movement is a likely consequence. Therefore, in this case, the person should not be relocated but instead another person should get the opportunity to be transferred to the respective Member State. Since the number of applicants eligible for relocation is significantly higher than the places available for relocation, a shortage of applicants for relocation will not occur. In addition, refusal to be relocated is expected to be rare due to the high incentives for applicants to participate in relocation, as, even in case of relocation to a Member State not belonging to his or her preferences, it would allow for quick integration opportunities in another Member State with reception capacity and high standard reception conditions readily available. Or. en Justification
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE