12 Amendments of Gabriel MATO related to 2018/0074(COD)
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The objectives of the CFP are, inter alia, to ensure that fishing and aquaculture are environmentally sustainable in the long term and that fishing and aquaculture activities are managed in a manner consistent with the objectives of generating economic, social and employment benefits, to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and to implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.
Amendment 134 #
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 17
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 17
(17) Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in subarea 8 and division 9a;
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 23 – indent 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 23 – indent 1
– In Southern Bay of Biscay (FU 253- 24);
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 1
– In Western Galicia (FU 26-27);
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 2
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 2 a (new)
– North of Portugual (FU 27)
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 2 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 24 – indent 2 b (new)
– Portuguese waters (southern Portugal and the Algarve) (FU 28-29)
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the best scientific advice available, in particular that of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), indicates a change in the geographical distribution of the stocks listed in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 amending this Regulation by adjusting the areas specified above in order to reflect that change. Such adjustments shall not extend the stock areas beyond Union waters of subareas 4 to 10, and the CECAF zones 34.1.1, 34.1.2 and 34.2.0.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The plan shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce MSY. In addition to pursuing environmental sustainability, the plan must be managed in a manner consistent with the objectives of generating economic, social and employment benefits, while contributing to the availability of food products.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Management measures for the stocks referred to in Article 1(4), including where appropriate fishing opportunities shall be set taking into account the best available scientific advice and shall be in accordance with the objectives laid down in Article 3.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. For the fish stocks and species referred to in Article 1(1) and (4), which are subject, at Union level and for the purpose of conserving resources, to fishing bans established an annual basis in the context of decisions on fishing opportunities or seasonal fishing bans, the Council may nevertheless establish exceptional fishing opportunities for some fisheries so that account can be taken of the limited or unavoidable nature of such catches in view of the particular socio- economic importance of these fisheries. These exceptional fishing opportunities should be limited and should not significantly outweigh the impact of the relevant temporary ban on fishing on the conservation of the stock.