BETA

Activities of Gabriel MATO related to 2018/0210(COD)

Reports (1)

RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1004
2021/06/30
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2018/0210(COD)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(53 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Gabriel MATO', 'mepid': 96936}]

Amendments (174)

Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 0
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 0
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) It is necessary to establish a European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) for the 2021- 2027 period. That fund should aim to target funding from the Union budget to support the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) together the EU's aquaculture policy, the Union's maritime policy and the Union's international commitments in the field of ocean governance. Such funding is a key enabler for sustainable fisheries and the conservation of marine biological resources, for sustainable seawater and freshwater aquaculture policy, for food security through the supply of seafood and freshwater food products, for the growth of a sustainable blue economy and for healthy, safe, secure, clean and sustainably managed seas, freshwaters and oceans.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) It is necessary to establish a European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFF) for the 2021- 2027 period. That fund should aim to target funding from the Union budget to support the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), the Union's maritime policy and the Union's international commitments in the field of ocean governance. Such funding is a key enabler for sustainable fisheries and the conservation of marine biological resources, for food security through the supply of seafood products, for the growth of a sustainable blue economy and for healthy, safe, secure, clean and sustainably managed seas and oceans.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Whereas, sustainable fisheries and seawater and freshwater aquaculture contributes significantly to the Union's food security, to the maintenance and creation of rural jobs and to the preservation of the natural environment and, in particular, biodiversity, the support and the development of the fisheries and the aquaculture sector shall be in the focus of the next EU fisheries policy.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Support under the EMFF should be used to address market failures or sub- optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, and should not duplicate or crowd out private financing or distort competition in the internal market. Support should have a clear European added value.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The multiannual financial framework set out in Regulation (EU) xx/xx6 provides that the Union budget must continue to support fisheries and maritime policies. The EMFF budget should amount, in current prices, to EUR 6 140 000 000 to EUR 6 867 000 000 in 2018 constant prices (i.e. EUR 7 739 000 000 in current prices) and can be increased or complemented by other funds. EMFF resources should be split between shared, direct and indirect management. EUR 5 311 90 % of the total EMFF budget (EUR 6 965 1000 000 in current prices) should be allocated to support under shared management and EUR 829 the rest 10 % (EUR 773 9000 000 in current prices) to support under direct and indirect management. In order to ensure stability in particular with regard to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, the definition of national allocations under shared management for the 2021- 2027 programming period should be based on the EMFF 2014-2020 shares. Specific amounts should be reserved for the outermost regions, control and enforcement and collection and processing of data for fisheries management and scientific purposes, while amounts for permanent cessation and extraordinary cessation of fishing activities should be capped. _________________ 6 OJ C […], […], p. […]. OJ C […], […], p. […].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The multiannual financial framework set out in Regulation (EU) xx/xx6 provides that the Union budget must continue to support fisheries and maritime policies. The EMFF budget should amountremain at level set for the budgetary period of 2014-2020, in current prices, so it has to be EUR 6 1400 000 000. EMFAF resources should be split between shared, direct and indirect management. EUR 5 311760 000 000 should be allocated to support under shared management and EUR 829640 000 000 to support under direct and indirect management. In order to ensure stability in particular with regard to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, the definition of national allocations under shared management for the 2021-2027 programming period should be based on the EMFAF 2014-2020 shares. Specific amounts should be reserved for the outermost regions, control and enforcement and collection and processing of data for fisheries management and scientific purposes, while amounts for permanent cessation and extraordinary cessation of fishing activities should be capped. _________________ 6 OJ C […], […], p. […]. OJ C […], […], p. […].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The EMFF should be based on fourive priorities: fostering sustainable fisheries and the conservation of marine biological resources; contributing to food security in the Union through competitive and sustainable aquaculture and marketsfostering sustainable aquaculture; promoting competitive and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture markets and processing sectors contributing to food security in the Union; enabling the growth of a sustainable blue economy and fostering prosperous coastal communities; strengthening international ocean governance and enabling safe, secure, clean and sustainably managed seas and oceans. Those priorities should be pursued through shared, direct and indirect management.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The EMFAF should be based on four priorities: fostering sustainable fisheries and the conservation of marine biological resources; contributing to food security in the Union through competitive and sustainable aquaculture and markets; enabling the growth of a sustainable blue economy and fostering prosperous coastal communities; strengthening international ocean governance and enabling safe, secure, clean and sustainably managed seas and oceans. Those priorities should be pursued through shared, direct and indirect management.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The EMFAF beyond 2020 should be based on a simplified architecture without predefining measures and detailed eligibility rules at Union level in an overly prescriptive manner. Instead, broad areas of support should be described under each priority. Member States should thus draw up their programme indicating therein the most appropriate means for achieving the priorities. A variety of measures identified by the Member States in those programmes might be supported under the rules set out in this Regulation and in Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions], provided they are covered by the areas of support identified in this Regulation. However, it is necessary to set out a list of ineligible operations so as to avoid detrimental impacts in terms of fisheries conservation, for example a general prohibition of investments enhancing fishing capacity. Moreover, investments and compensations for the fleet should be strictly conditional on their consistency with the conservation objectives of the CFP.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The United nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development identified conservation and sustainable use of oceans as one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 14). The Union is fully committed to that goal and its implementation. In that context, it has committed to promote a sustainable blue economy which is consistent with maritime spatial planning, the conservation of biological resources and the achievement of good environmental status, to prohibit certain forms of fisheries subsidies which contribute to overcapacity and overfishing, to eliminate subsidies that contribute to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and to refrain from introducing new such subsidies. This outcome should result from the World Trade Organisation fisheries subsidies negotiation. In addition, in the course of World Trade Organisation negotiations at the 2002 World Summit of Sustainable Development and at the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), the Union has committed to eliminate subsidies contributing to fisheries overcapacity and overfishing. Acknowledges that the sustainable EU fisheries and the seawater and freshwater aquaculture sectors contribute significantly to the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) The EMFF should also contribute to the other Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for the United Nations. In particular, this Regulation takes into account the following goals: SDG 1 – End Poverty: the EMFF will contribute to improving living conditions for the most vulnerable coastal communities jointly with the EAFRD, in particular those that depend on a fishing resource threatened by overfishing, global changes or environmental problems. SDG 3 – Good Health and Well-Being: the EMFF will contribute to combating the coastal water pollution responsible for endemic diseases jointly with the ERDF, and to guaranteeing good quality food from fisheries and aquaculture. SDG 7 – Clean Energy: the EMFF will promote the development of renewable marine energy by financing the blue economy jointly with the funds for Horizon 2020, and will ensure that this development is suitable for protecting the marine environment and preserving fishery resources. SDG 8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth: the EMFF will contribute to the development of the blue economy jointly with the ESF, as a factor for economic growth. It will also ensure that this economic growth is a decent source of employment for coastal communities. Furthermore, the EMFF will contribute to improving working conditions for fishers. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production: the EMFF will contribute to moving towards the responsible use of natural resources and limiting natural resources and energy wastage. SDG 13 – Climate Action: the EMFF will provide guidance on its budget for combating climate change.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Regulation should contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under this Regulation are expected to contribute to 30% of the overall financial envelope of the EMFAF to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the preparation and implementation of the EMFAF, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The EMFAF should contribute to the achievement of the environmental objectives of the Union. This contribution should be tracked through the application of Union environmental markers and reported regularly in the context of evaluations and annual performance reports.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In accordance with Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council ('CFP Regulation')7 , Union financial assistance under the EMFAF should be conditional upon compliance with the rules of the CFP. Applications from beneficiaries that do not comply with the applicable rules of the CFP should not be admissible. _________________ 7 Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Much has been achieved over the last few years by the CFP in bringing fish stocks back to healthy levels, in increasing the profitability of the Union's fishing industry and in conserving marine ecosystems. However, substantial challenges remain to achieve the socio- economic and environmental objectives of CFP. This requires continued support beyond 2020, notably in sea basins where progress has been slower, particularly in the most isolated ones like outermost regions.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Fisheries are vital to the livelihood and cultural heritage of many coastal communities in the Union, in particular where small-scale coastal fishing plays an important role such as outermost regions. With the average age in many fishing communities being over 50, generational renewal and diversification of activities remain a challenge.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The EMFAF should aim to achieve the environmental, economic, social and employment objectives of the CFP, as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Such support should ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long- term and managed in a way that is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, social and employment benefits, and of contributing to the availability of food supplies.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Support from the EMFAF should aim to achieve and maintain sustainable fishing based on the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and sustainable aquaculture as well and to minimise the negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem. That support should include innovation and investments in low-impact, climate resilient and low-carbon fishing and aquaculture practices and techniques.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The landing obligation is one of the main challenges of the CFP. It has implied significant changes in fishing practices for the sector, sometimes with an important financial cost. It should therefore be possible for the EMFAF to support innovation and investments that contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation, with a higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations, like investments in selective fishing gears, in the improvement of port infrastructures and in the marketing of unwanted catches. It should also grant a maximum aid intensity rate of 100% to the design, development, monitoring, evaluation and management of transparent systems for exchanging fishing opportunities between Member States ('quota swaps'), in order to mitigate the 'choke species' effect caused by the landing obligation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) It should be possible for the EMFAF to support innovation and investments on board fishing vessels in order to improve health, safety and working conditions, energy efficiency and the quality of catches. Such support should, however, not lead to an increase of fishing capacity or ability to find fish and should not be granted simply for complying with requirements that are obligatory under Union or national law. Under the architecture with no prescriptive measures, it should be up to Member States to define the precise eligibility rules for those investments. With regard to health, safety and working conditions on board fishing vessels, a higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations should be allowed.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) The success of the CFP is dependent on the availability of scientific advice for the management of fisheries, and hence on the availability of data on fisheries. In the light of the challenges and costs to obtain reliable and complete data, it is necessary to support Member States' actions to collect and process data in line with Regulation (EU) No 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council ('Data Collection Framework Regulation')9 and to contribute to the best available scientific advice. This support should allow synergies with the collection and processing of other types of marine data, including data about recreational fisheries. _________________ 9 Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 (OJ L 157, 20.06.2017, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Fisheries control is of utmost importance for the implementation of the CFP. Therefore, the EMFAF should support under shared management the development and implementation of a Union fisheries control system as specified in Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 ('Control Regulation')8 . Certain obligations foreseen by the revision of the Control Regulation justify a specific support from the EMFAF, i.e. the compulsory vessel tracking and electronic reporting systems in the case of small-scale coastal fishing vessels, the compulsory remote electronic monitoring systems and the compulsory continuous measurement and recording of propulsive engine power. In addition, investments by Member States in control assets could also be used for the purpose of maritime surveillance and cooperation on coastguard functions. _________________ 8 Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The EMFAF should support an effective knowledge-based implementation and governance of the CFP under direct and indirect management through the provision of scientific advice, the development and implementation of a Union fisheries control system, the functioning of Advisory Councils and voluntary contributions to international organisations.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Given the challenges to achieve the conservation objectives of the CFP, it should be possible for the EMFAF to support actions for the management of fisheries and fishing fleets. In this context, support for fleet adaptation remains sometimes necessary with regard to certain fleet segments and sea basins. Such support should be tightly targeted to the conservation and sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources and aimed to achieve balance between the fishing capacity and the available fishing opportunities. Therefore, it should be possible for the EMFAF to support the permanent cessation of fishing activities in fleet segments where the fishing capacity is not balanced with the available fishing opportunities. Such support should be a tool of the action plans for the adjustment of fleet segments with identified structural overcapacity, as provided for in Article 22(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and should be implemented either through the scrapping of the fishing vessel or through its decommissioning and retrofitting for other activities. Where the retrofitting would lead to an increased pressure of recreational fishing on the marine ecosystem, support should only be granted if in line with the CFP and the objectives of the relevant multiannual plans. In order to ensure the consistency of fleet structural adaptation with conservation objectives, support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities should be strictly conditional and linked to the achievement of results. It should therefore be implemented only by financing not linked to costs, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions]. Under that mechanism, Member States should not be reimbursed by the Commission for permanent cessation of fishing activities on the basis of real costs incurred but on the basis of the fulfilment of conditions and of the achievement of results. For this purpose, the Commission should establish in a delegated act such conditions, which should relate to the achievement of the conservation objectives of the CFP.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Given the high level of unpredictability of fishing activities, exceptional circumstances may cause significant economic losses to fishers. In order to mitigate those consequences, it should be possible for the EMFAF to support a compensation for the extraordinary cessation of fishing activities caused by the implementation of certain conservation measures, i.e. multiannual plans, targets for the conservation and sustainable exploitation of stocks, measures to adapt the fishing capacity of fishing vessels to available fishing opportunities and technical measures, by the implementation of emergency measures, by the interruption, due to reasons of force majeure, of the application of a sustainable fisheries partnership agreement, by a natural disaster or by an environmental incident. Support should be granted only if the impact on fishers of such circumstances is significant, i.e. if the commercial activities of the vessel concerned are stopped during at least 90 consecutive days and if the economic losses resulting from the cessation amount to more than 30% of the average annual turnover of the business concerned during a specified period of time. The specificities of eel fisheries should be taken into account in the conditions for granting such support.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) It should be possible for fishermen and seawater and freshwater aquaculture producers to receive support from the EMFAF in case of crisis in the fisheries and aquaculture markets, natural disasters or environmental incidents.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) SAccording to the Union's definition lacking unanimous consensus and requiring revision to include new criteria, small-scale coastal fishing is carried out by fishing vessels below 12 metres and not using towed fishing gears, as well as fishing and shellfish harvesting on foot. That sector represents nearly 75% of all fishing vessels registered in the Union and nearly half of all employment in the fishery sector. Operators from small- scale coastal fisheries are particularly dependant on healthy fish stocks for their main source of income. The EMFF should therefore give them a preferential treatment through a 100% aid intensity rate, including for operations related to control and enforcement, with the aim of encouraging sustainable fishing practices. In addition, certain areas of support should be reserved for small-scale fishing in fleet segment where the fishing capacity is balanced with the available fishing opportunities, i.e. support for the acquisition of a second- hand vessel and for engine replacement or modernisationor new vessel construction not intended to increase fishing capacity or effort. Furthermore, Member States should include in their programme an action plan for small-scale coastal fishing, which should be monitored on the basis of indicators for which milestones and targets should be set.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Small-scale coastal fishing is carried out, in principle, by fishing vessels below 12 metres and not using towed fishing gears. That sector represents nearly 75% of all fishing vessels registered in the Union and nearly half of all employment in the fishery sector. Operators from small- scale coastal fisheries are particularly dependant on healthy fish stocks for their main source of income. The EMFF should therefore give them a preferential treatment through a 100% aid intensity rate, including for operations related to control and enforcement, with the aim of encouraging sustainable fishing practices. In addition, certain areas of support should be reserved for small-scale fishing in fleet segment where the fishing capacity is balanced with the available fishing opportunities, i.e. support for the acquisition of a second- hand vessel and for engine replacement or modernisation. Furthermore, Member States should include in their programme an action plan for small-scale coastal fishing, which should be monitored on the basis of indicators for which milestones and targets should be set.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Small-scale coastal fishing is carried out by fishing vessels below 12 metres and not using towed fishing gears. That sector represents nearly 75% of all fishing vessels registered in the Union and nearly half of all employment in the fishery sector. Operators from small-scale coastal fisheries are particularly dependant on healthy fish stocks for their main source of income. The EMFAF should therefore give them a preferential treatment through a 100% aid intensity rate, including for operations related to control and enforcement, with the aim of encouraging sustainable fishing practices. In addition, certain areas of support should be reserved for small-scale fishing in fleet segment where the fishing capacity is balanced with the available fishing opportunities, i.e. support for the acquisition of a second- hand vessel and for engine replacement or modernisation. Furthermore, Member States should include in their programme an action plan for small-scale coastal fishing, which should be monitored on the basis of indicators for which milestones and targets should be set.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The outermost regions, as outlined in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank of 24 October 2017 entitled 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'10 , face specific challenges linked to their remoteness, topography and climate as referred to in Article 349 of the Treaty and also have specific assets on which to develop a sustainable blue economy. Therefore, for each outermost region, an action plan for the development of sustainable blue economy sectors, including the sustainable exploitation of fisheries and aquaculture, should be attached to the programme of the concerned Member States and a financial allocation should be reserved to support the implementation of those action plans. It should also be possible for the EMFF to support a compensation of the additional costs the outermost regions face due to their location and insularity. That support should be capped as a percentage of this overall financial allocation. In addition, a higher aid intensity rate than the one that appliesFurthermore, it should be possible for the EMFF to support operations located in those regions concerning the protection and restoration of marine and coastal biodiversity and ecosystems and investments in the fishing fleets, in aquaculture and in the processing industry. With regard to investments in the fishing fleets, the EMFF should support specific measures for those regions, considering their specificities and geographical conditions and ensuring a sustainable balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities, as outlined in the Resolution of the European Parliament entitled “The management of the fishing fleets in the Outermost Regions”. In addition, a higher aid intensity and co-financing rates than those that apply to other operations should be applied in the outermost regions. _________________ 10 COM(2017) 623 COM(2017) 623
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The outermost regions, as outlined in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank of 24 October 2017 entitled 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'10, face specific challenges linked to their remoteness, topography and climate as referred to in Article 349 of the Treaty and also have specific assets on which to develop a sustainable blue economy. Therefore, for each outermost region, an action plan for the development of sustainable blue economy sectors, including the sustainable exploitation of fisheries and aquaculture, should be attached to the programme of the concerned Member States and a financial allocation should be reserved to support the implementation of those action plans. It should also be possible for the EMFF to support a compensation of the additional costs the outermost regions face due to their locationremoteness and insularity. That support should be capped as a percentage of this overall financial allocatione lessons drawn from the 2014-2020 programming period call for a simplified implementation of the compensation of the additional costs scheme in the interest of beneficiaries, in line with the Commission’s goal of simplification. Member States should have more flexibility to modify their allocation during the budgetary period. In addition, a higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations should be applied in the outermost regions. _________________ 10COM(2017) 623.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The outermost regions, as outlined in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank of 24 October 2017 entitled 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'10 , face specific challenges linked to their remoteness, topography and climate as referred to in Article 349 of the Treaty and also have specific assets on which to develop a sustainable blue economy. Therefore, for each outermost region, an action plan for the development of sustainable blue economy sectors, including the sustainable exploitation of fisheries and aquaculture, should be attached to the programme of the concerned Member States and a financial allocation should be reserved to support the implementation of those action plans. It should also be possible for the EMFF to support a compensation of the additional costs the outermost regions face due to their location and insularity. That support should be capped as a percentage of this overall financial allocation. In addition, a higher aid intensity rate and EMFF financing rate than the one that applies to other operatutermost regions should be applied in the outermost regions. _________________ 10 COM(2017) 623
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The outermost regions, as outlined in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank of 24 October 2017 entitled 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'10 , face specific challenges linked to their remoteness, topography and climate as referred to in Article 349 of the Treaty and also have specific assets on which to develop a sustainable blue economy. Therefore, for each outermost region, an action plan for the development of sustainable blue economy sectors, including the sustainable exploitation of fisheries and aquaculture, should be attached to the programme of the concerned Member States and a financial allocation should be reserved to support the implementation of those action plans. It should also be possible for the EMFAF to support a compensation of the additional costs the outermost regions face due to their location and insularity. That support should be capped as a percentage of this overall financial allocation. In addition, a higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations should be applied in the outermost regions. _________________ 10 COM(2017) 623 COM(2017) 623
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) In order to ensure the survival of the fisheries sector in the outermost regions and in compliance with the principles of differential treatment for small islands and territories mentioned in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14, it should be possible for the EMFF to support, on the basis of Article 349 TFEU, the renewal of the outermost regions’ small-scale coastal fishing vessels which land all their catches in ports in the outermost regions and contribute to local sustainable development, so as to increase human safety, to comply with European hygiene standards, to fight IUU fishing and to achieve greater environmental efficiency. This fishing fleet renewal should remain within the limits of authorised capacity ceilings, should be restricted to the replacement of an old vessel by a new one, and should allow sustainable fishing and the reaching of the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) objective. It should be possible for the EMFF to support associated measures, such as the construction or the modernisation of small shipyards dedicated to traditional and artisanal fishing vessels in the outermost regions, the renovation of the deck, or studies.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) In order to ensure the survival of the fisheries sector in the outermost regions and in compliance with the principles of differential treatment for small islands and territories mentioned in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14, it should be possible for the EMFF to support, on the basis of Article 349 TFEU, the acquisition and the renewal of the outermost regions’ small-scale coastal fishing vessels which land all their catches in ports in the outermost regions and contribute to local sustainable development, so as to increase human safety, to comply with European hygiene standards, to fight IUU fishing and to achieve greater environmental efficiency. This fishing fleet renewal should remain within the limits of authorised capacity ceilings and should allow sustainable fishing and the reaching of the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) objective. It should be possible for the EMFF to support associated measures, such as the construction or the modernisation of shipyards dedicated to traditional and artisanal fishing vessels in the outermost regions, the acquisition or the renovation of infrastructures and equipment or studies.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 b (new)
(29b) With a view to alleviating the above-mentioned specific constraints in outermost regions and on the basis of Article 349 TFEU, it should be possible to grant State operating aid under a simplified procedure.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Under shared management, it should be possible for the EMFF to support the protection and restoration of marine and coastal biodiversity and ecosystems. For that purpose, support should be available to compensate the collection by fishers of lost fishing gears and marine litter from the sea and for investments in ports to provide adequate reception facilities for lost fishing gears and marine litter. Support should also be available for actions to achieve or maintain a good environmental status in the marine environment as set out in Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ('Maritime Strategy Framework Directive')11 , for the implementation of spatial protection measures established pursuant to that Directive and, in accordance with the prioritised action frameworks established pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC ('Habitats Directive')12 , for the management, restoration and monitoring of NATURA 2000 areas as well as for the protection of species under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ('Birds Directive')13 and also for the construction, installation, modernization and scientific preparation and evaluation of static or movable facilities intended to protect and enhance marine fauna and flora in the outermost regions. Under direct management, the EMFF should support the promotion of clean and healthy seas and the implementation of the European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy developed in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 16 January 201614 , in coherence with the objective of achieving or maintaining a good environmental status in the marine environment. _________________ 11 Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19). 12 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.07.1992, p. 7). 13 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.01.2010, p. 7). 14 COM(2018) 28 COM(2018) 28
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) It should be possible for the EMFAF to support the promotion and the sustainable development of aquacultureseawater and freshwater aquaculture by means of a predefined sub-budget and a specific chapter in the regulation, including freshwater aquaculture, for the farming of aquatic animals and plants for the production of food and other raw material. Complex administrative procedures in some Member States remain in place, such as difficult access to space and burdensome licensing procedures, which make it difficult for the sector to improve the image and competitiveness of farmed products. Support should be consistent with the multiannual national strategic plans for aquaculture developed on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. In particular, support for environmental sustainability, productive investments, innovresearch and development, innovation, training and education, acquisition of professional skills, improvement of working conditions, development of the processing sector, management consultancy, promotion of aquaculture products, compensatory measures providing critical land and nature management services should be eligible. Public health actions, aquaculture stock insurance schemes and animal health and welfare actions should also be eligible. However, iIn the case of productive investments support should be provided only throughin particular through non-repayable grants, financial instruments and through InvestEU, which offer a higher leverage on markets and are therefore more relevant than grants to address the financing challenges of the sector.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) It should be possible for the EMFF to support the promotion and the sustainable development of aquaculture, including freshwater aquaculture, for the farming of aquatic animals and plants for the production of food and other raw material, including by substantially increasing sustainable production and by fostering the acceptance of aquaculture by society. Complex administrative procedures in some Member States remain in place, such as difficult access to space and burdensome licensing procedures, which make it difficult for the sector to develop, to expand and to improve the image and competitiveness of farmed products. Support should be consistent with the multiannual national strategic plans for aquaculture developed on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. In particular, support for environmental sustainability, productive investments, innovation, acquisition of professional skills, improvement of working conditions, compensatory measures providing critical land and nature management services should be eligible. Public health actions, aquaculture stock insurance schemes and animal health and welfare actions should also be eligible. However, in the case of productive investments support should be provided only through financial instruments and through InvestEU, which offer a higher leverage on markets and are therefore more relevant than grants to address the financing challenges of the sector.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Food security relies on efficient and well-organised markets, which improve the transparency, stability, quality and diversity of the supply chain, as well as consumer information. For that purpose, it should be possible for the EMFAF to support the marketing of fishery and aquaculture products, in line with the objectives of Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council ('CMO Regulation')15 . In particular, support should be available for the creation of producerand the management of producer and interbranch organisations, the drafting and implementation of production and marketing plans, the promotion of new market outlets for fishery and aquaculture products and the development and dissemination of market intelligence. _________________ 15 Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1184/2006 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) The processing industry plays a role in the availability and quality of fishery and aquaculture products. It should be possible for the EMFAF to support targeted investments in that industry, provided they contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CMO. Such support should be provided only through financial instruments and through InvestEU and not through grantthrough in particular non-repayable grants, financial instruments and through InvestEU. The EU shall also enable that the investments in the processing industry could be financed from other Structural Funds.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) Job creation in coastal regions relies on a locally driven development of a sustainable blue economy that revives the social fabric of those regions. Ocean industries and services are likely to outperform the growth of the global economy and make an important contribution to employment and growth by 2030. To be sustainable, blue growth depends on innovation and investment in new maritime businesses and in the bio- economy, including sustainable tourism models, ocean-based renewable energy, innovative high-end shipbuilding and new port service and the sustainable development of the fisheries and the aquaculture sector, which can create jobs and at the same time enhance local development. Whilst public investment in the sustainable blue economy should be mainstreamed throughout the Union budget, the EMFAF should specifically concentrate on enabling conditions for the development of the sustainable blue economy and on removing bottlenecks to facilitate investment and the development of new markets and technologies or services. Support for the development of the sustainable blue economy should be delivered through shared, direct and indirect management.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) The development of a sustainable blue economy strongly relies on partnerships between local stakeholders that contribute to the vitality of coastal and inland communities and economies. The EMFAF should provide tools to foster such partnerships. For that purpose, support for community-led local development (CLLD) should be available under shared management. That approach should boost economic diversification in a local context through the development of coastal and inland fisheries, aquaculture and a sustainable blue economy. CLLD strategies should ensure that local communities better exploit and benefit from the opportunities offered by the sustainable blue economy, capitalising on and strengthening environmental, cultural, social and human resources. Every local partnership should therefore reflect the main focus of its strategy by ensuring a balanced involvement and representation of all relevant stakeholders from the local sustainable blue economy.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Under shared management, it should be possible for the EMFAF to support the sustainable blue economy through the collection, management and use of data to improve the knowledge on the state of the marine and freshwater environment. That support should aim to fulfil requirements under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC, to support maritime spatial planning, the sustainability of the fisheries and the aquaculture sector and to increase data quality and sharing through the European marine observation and data network.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Under direct and indirect management, the EMFAF should focus on the enabling conditions for a sustainable blue economy through the promotion of an integrated governance and management of the maritime policy, the enhancement of the transfer and uptake of research, innovation and technology in the sustainable blue economy, the improvement of maritime skills, ocean literacy and sharing of socio-economic data on the sustainable blue economy, the promotion of a low-carbon and climate resilient sustainable blue economy and the development of project pipelines and innovative financing instruments. Due consideration to the outermost regions' specific situation should be given in relation to the above mentioned fields.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) Actions promoting international ocean governance under the EMFAF are to improve the overarching framework of international and regional processes, agreements, rules and institutions to regulate and manage human activity in the oceans. The EMFAF should fund international arrangements that the Union has concluded in areas not covered by the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPAs) established with various third countries as well as the Union's legal membership contribution to regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs). SFPAs and RFMOs will continue to be funded under different strands of the Union budget.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) With regard to security and defence, improved border protection and maritime security are essential. Under the European Union Maritime Security Strategy adopted by the Council of the European Union on 24 June 2014 and its Action Plan adopted on 16 December 2014, information sharing and the European Border and Coast Guard cooperation between the European Fisheries Control Agency, the European Maritime Safety Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency are key to deliver on those objectives. The EMFAF should therefore support maritime surveillance and coastguard cooperation under both shared and direct management, including by purchasing items for multipurpose maritime operations. It should also allow the relevant agencies to implement support in the field of maritime surveillance and security through indirect management.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) Performance of EMFAF support in Member States should be assessed on the basis of indicators. Member States should report in every two years on progress towards established milestones and targets and the Commission should carry out a performance review based on annual performance reports in every two years prepared by Member States, allowing for early detection of potential implementation issues and corrective actions. A monitoring and evaluation framework should be established for that purpose.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) Pursuant to paragraphs 22 and 23 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making18 , there is a need to evaluate the EMFAF on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens, in particular on Member States. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the EMFAF on the ground. _________________ 18 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making (OJ L 123, 12.05.2016, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) The Commission should implement information and communication actions relating to the EMFAF, and its actions and results. Financial resources allocated to the EMFAF should also contribute to the corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, as far as they are related to the priorities of the EMFAF.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) In accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union], Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 , Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2988/9520 , Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/9621 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/193922 , the financial interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of irregularities, including fraud, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative sanctions. In particular, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 and Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) might carry out investigations, including on-the- spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) might investigate and prosecute fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 . In accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union], any person or entity receiving Union funds is to fully cooperate in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, to grant the necessary rights and access to the Commission, OLAF, the EPPO and the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and to ensure that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights. Member States should ensure that in the management and implementation of the EMFAF, the financial interests of the Union are protected, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union] and Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions]. _________________ 19 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18.09.2013, p. 1). 20 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.95, p.1). 21 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2). 22 Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (OJ L 283, 31.10.2017, p. 1). 23 Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) In order to enhance transparency regarding the use of Union funds and their sound financial management, in particular reinforcing public control of the money used, certain information on the operations funded under the EMFAF should be published on a website of Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions]. When a Member State publishes information on operations funded under EMFAF, the rules on the protection of personal data set out in Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 are to be complied with. _________________ 24 Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 04.05.2016, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF). It lays down the priorities of the EMFAF, the budget for the period 2021-2027, the forms of Union funding and the specific rules for providing such funding, complementing the general rules applying to the EMFAF under Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFF). It lays down the priorities of the EMFF, the budget for the period 2021- 2027, the forms of Union funding and the specific rules for providing such funding, complementing the general rules applying to the EMFF under Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 6 a (new)
(6 a) 'recreational fisheries' means non- commercial fishing activities exploiting marine biological resources for recreation, tourism or sport;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 12
(12) 'productive aquaculture investments' means investments in the construction, extension, modernisation or in the equipment of facilities for aquaculture production;deleted
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 13
(13) 'sea basin strategy' means an integrated framework to address common marine and maritime challenges faced by Member States, and where appropriate third countries, in a specific sea basin or in one or more sub-sea basins, and promote cooperation and coordination in order to achieve economic, social and territorial cohesion; it is developed by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States and third countries concerned, their regions and other stakeholders as appropriate;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 14
(14) ‘small-scale coastal fishing’ means fishing carried out by fishing vessels of an overall length of less than 12 metres and not using towed gear as listed in Article 2(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/200626, fishing on foot and shellfish gathering; _________________ 26 Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 of 21 December 2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea, amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1626/94 (OJ L 409, 30.12.2006, p. 11).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 14 a (new)
(14 a) 'small-scale fleet from outermost regions' means the small-scale fleets that operates at the outermost regions as defined in each national operational programs
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The EMFAF shall contribute to the implementation of the CFP and of the maritime policy. It shall pursue the following priorities:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) Fostering sustainable fisheries and aquaculture and the conservation of freshwater and marine biological resources;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) Fostering sustainable aquaculture;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) Contributing to food security in the Union through competitive and sustainable aquaculture and marketsPromoting competitive and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture markets and processing sectors contributing to food security in the Union;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) Contributing to food security in the Union through competitive and sustainable seawater and freshwater aquaculture and markets;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) Enabling the growth of a sustainable blue economy and fostering prosperous coastal and waterfront communities;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Support under the EMFAF shall contribute to the achievement of the environmental and climate change mitigation and adaptation and food security objectives of the Union. That contribution shall be tracked in accordance with the methodology set out in Annex IV.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the EMFF for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 6 140867 000 000 in 2018 constant prices (i.e. EUR 7 739 000 000 in current prices).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the EMFAF for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 6 1400 000 000 in current prices.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The part of the financial envelope allocated to the EMFAF under Title II shall be implemented in shared management in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions] and Article 63 of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The part of the financial envelope allocated to the EMFAF under Title III shall be implemented either directly by the Commission in accordance with Article 62(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union] or within the framework of indirect management in accordance with Article 62(1)(c) of that Regulation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The part of the financial envelope under shared management as specified in Title II shall be EUR 5 311 06 965 100 000 in current prices in accordance with the annual breakdown set out in Annex V.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The part of the financial envelope under shared management as specified in Title II shall be EUR 5 311740 000 000 in current prices in accordance with the annual breakdown set out in Annex V.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) EUR 102 0023 340 000 for the Azores and Madeira;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) EUR 82 00104 110 000 for the Canary Islands;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) EUR 131 00058 407 000 for Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Mayotte, Réunion and Saint-Martin.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The Union financial support from the EMFAF allocated per Member State to the areas of support referred to in Articles 17(2) and 18 shall not exceed the higher of the following two thresholds:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. In accordance with Articles 30 to 32 of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions], the EMFAF may support technical assistance for the effective administration and use of this Fund at the initiative of a Member State.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The part of the financial envelope under direct and indirect management as specified in Title III shall be EUR 829640 000 000 in current prices.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The part of the financial envelope under direct and indirect management as specified in Title III shall be EUR 829 0773 900 000 in current prices.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The amount referred to in paragraph 1 may be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the EMFAF, such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities including corporate information technology systems.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
In particular, the EMFAF may support, at the initiative of the Commission and subject to the ceiling of 1.7% of the financial envelope referred to in Article 5(1):
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The EMFAF shall support the costs of information and communication activities linked to the implementation of this Regulation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point b a (new)
(b a) where applicable, the need to acquire, modernise or renew the fleet;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point g
(g) the contribution of the programme to the conservation and restoration of marine and freshwater ecosystems, while the support related to Natura 2000 areas shall be in accordance with the prioritised action frameworks established pursuant to Article 8(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. An application submitted by a beneficiary for support from the EMFAF shall be inadmissible for an identified period of time laid down pursuant to paragraph 4, if it has been determined by the competent authority that the beneficiary concerned:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) has committed serious and repeated infringements under Article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/200828 or Article 90 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 or under other legislation adopted by the European Parliament and by the Council; _________________ 28 Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1093/94 and (EC) No 1447/1999 (OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) has committed any of the environmental offences set out in Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council29 , where the application is made for support under Article 23. _________________ 29 Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the protection of the environment through criminal law (OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p. 28).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall require that beneficiaries submitting an application under the EMFAF provide to the managing authority a signed statement confirming that they respect the criteria listed in paragraphs 1 and 3. Member States shall verify the veracity of that statement before approving the operation, based on the information available in the national registers of infringements referred to in Article 93 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, or any other available data.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) a) operations that increase the fishing capacity of a fishing vessel or support the acquisition of equipment that increases the ability of a fishing vessel to find fish; capacity increases intended solely to improve liveability and safety on board shall not be considered as fishing capacity.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) operations that increase the fishing capacity of a fishing vessel or support the acquisition of equipment that increases the ability of a fishing vessel to find fish, unless otherwise is provided for in this Regulation;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the construction and acquisition of fishing vessels or the importation of fishing vessels, unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) direct restocking, except explicitly provided for as a conservation measure by a Union legal act or in the case of experimental restocking or restocking associated with processes to improve the environmental and production conditions of the natural environment;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) with the exception of cases where the construction of new ports, new landing sites or new auction halls takes place in the ORs and peripheral and non-urban coastal areas;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) market intervention mechanisms aiming to temporarily or permanently withdraw fishery or aquaculture products from the market with a view to reducing supply in order to prevent price decline or drive up prices; by extension, storage operations in a logistics chain that would produce the same effects either intentionally or unintentionally;deleted
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) market intervention mechanisms aiming to temporarily or permanently withdraw fishery or aquaculture products from the market with a view to reducing supply in order to prevent price decline or drive up prices; by extension, storage operations in a logistics chain that would produce the same effects either intentionally or unintentionally;deleted
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(ka) the replacement or modernisation of the main or auxiliary engine of the vessel if it results in an increase in power in Kw;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point k b (new)
(kb) the production of genetically modified organisms where it may adversely affect the natural environment.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) improvement of health, safety and working conditions on board fishing vessels and in fishing on foot and shellfish harvesting;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) participation in the sustainable management and conservation of natural resources and ecosystems in Natura 2000 areas and coastal habitats of particular interest to fisheries;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) In order to alleviate the administrative burden on members of the maritime-fishing sector applying for aid, in particular those belonging to the small- scale coastal fleet segment, it is appropriate to include in the action plans a single simplified application form for EMFF measures.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The EMFAF may support the following investments in respect of small- scale coastal fishing vessels which belong to a fleet segment for which the latest report on fishing capacity, referred to in Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, has shown a balance with the fishing opportunities available to that segment:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the replacement or modernisation of a main or ancillary engine, or the modernization of any other component of the propulsion equipment, as well as the alterations and additions necessary for its installation on board.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The vessels referred to in paragraph 1 shall be equipped for sea fishing and be between 5 and 320 years old.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The vessels referred to in paragraph 1 shall be equipped for sea fishing and be between 5 and 30 years old, when duly justified may apply to newer vessels.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the new or modernised engine shall not have more power in kW than the current engine, without prejudice to the provisions of point 3a;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In the outermost regions, the power of the new engine or the modernized engine may exceed the current engine's kW in the case of a duly justified need for increased power for reasons of safety at sea and that does not involve an increase in fishing effort
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support operations for the management of fisheries and fishing fleets.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the fishing vessel is registered as active and has carried out fishing activities at sea for at least 120 days in each of the last three calendar years preceding the year of submission of the application for support;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The EMFAF may support a compensation for the extraordinary cessation of fishing activities caused by:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The support referred to in paragraph 1 may only be granted where: (a) the commercial activities of the vessel concerned are stopped during at least 90 consecutive days; and (b) the economic losses resulting from the cessation amount to more than 30% of the annual turnover of the business concerned, calculated on the basis of the average turnover of that business over the preceding three calendar years.deleted
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) owners of fishing vessels which are registered as active and which have carried out fishing activities at sea for at least 120 days in each of the last three calendar years preceding the year of submission of the application for support; or
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) fishers who have worked at sea for at least 120 days in each of the last three calendar years preceding the year of submission of the application for support on board a Union fishing vessel concerned by the extraordinary cessation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a Compensation for crisis-affected fishermen and seawater and freshwater aquaculture producers In the event of a crisis on fisheries and aquaculture markets, natural disasters or environmental incidents, EMFAF may provide support to fishermen and seawater and freshwater aquaculture producers affected by the crisis. The aid may be granted to offset the damage declared formally by the competent authorities of the given Member State. The aid may be provided by the Member State either directly to the fishermen and aquaculture producers concerned or by contribution to a mutual risk fund.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support the development and implementation of a Union fisheries control system as provided for in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and further specified in Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 785 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFF may support the collection, management and use of data for fisheries and aquaculture management and scientific purposes, including data on recreational fisheries, as provided for in Article 25(1) and (2) and Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and further specified in Regulation (EU) No 2017/1004, on the basis of the national work plans referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1004.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support the collection, management and use of data for fisheries management and scientific purposes, as provided for in Article 25(1) and (2) and Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and further specified in Regulation (EU) No 2017/1004, on the basis of the national work plans referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1004.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support the compensation of additional costs incurred by beneficiaries in the fishing, farming, processing and marketing of certain fishery and aquaculture products from the outermost regions referred to in Article 6(2).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – title
22 Protection and restoration of marine and, coastal and freshwater biodiversity and ecosystems
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 800 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support actions for the protection and restoration of marine and, coastal and freshwater biodiversity and ecosystems, including in inland waters.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 806 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) compensations to fishers for the collection of lost fishing gears and marine litter from the sea by fishers, including compensations to said fishers;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 823 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) contributions to a better management or conservation of marine biological resources.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 2 – chapter 3 – title
Priority 2: Contributing to food security in the Union through competitive andFostering sustainable aquaculture and markets
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 843 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support the promotion of a sustainable - seawater and freshwater - aquaculture as provided for in Article 34(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and for the increase of aquaculture production. It may also support animal health and welfare in aquaculture in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 and Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council33 . _________________ 32 Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health ('Animal Health Law') (OJ L 84, 31.03.2016, p. 1). 33 Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material, amending Council Directives 98/56/EC, 2000/29/EC and 2008/90/EC, Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 882/2004 and (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 66/399/EEC, 76/894/EEC and 2009/470/EC (OJ L 189, 27.06.2014, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Productive aquaculture investments under this Article may only be supported through thenon-repayable grants, financial instruments provided for in Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions] and through InvestEU, in accordance Article 10 of that Regulation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Productive aAquaculture investments under this Article may only be supported through grants and through the financial instruments provided for in Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions] and through InvestEU, in accordance Article 10 of that Regulation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 860 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – title
24 CHAPTER III BIS (NEW)Priority 2 a (new): Promoting competitive and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture markets and processing sectors contributing to food security in the Union Article 24 Marketing of fishery and aquaculture products
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
The EMFAF may support actions contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products as provided for in Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and further specified in Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013. It may also support actions promoting the marketing, the quality and the value added of fishery and aquaculture products as well as their promotion on the EU internal market and in third countries.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support investments in the processing of fishery and aquaculture products. Such support shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products as provided for in Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and further specified in Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 884 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The development of fisheries and aquaculture processing plants may be supported by the Member States by the involvement of other Structural Fund resources.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 889 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 2 – chapter 4 – title
Priority 3: Enabling the growth of a sustainable blue economy and fostering prosperous coastal and waterfront communities
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support the sustainable development of local economies and communities through the community-led local development set out in Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of EMFAF support, the community-led local development strategies referred to in Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation laying down Common Provisions] shall ensure that local communities better exploit and benefit from the opportunities offered by the sustainable blue economy, capitalising on and strengthening environmental, cultural, social and human resources.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 905 #
27 Marine and freshwater knowledge
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The EMFAF may support the collection, management and use of data to improve the knowledge on the state of the marine and freshwater environment, with a view to:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 3 – chapter 5 a (new)
Title III Chapter 5a (new) “Outermost regions” Article 29a Budgetary resources under shared management 1. For operations located in the outermost regions, each Member State concerned shall allocate, within its Union financial support set out in Annex V, at least: (a) EUR 114 000 000 for the Azores and Madeira; (b) EUR 91 700 000 for the Canary Islands; (c) EUR 146 500 000 for Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Mayotte, Réunion and Saint-Martin. 2. Each Member State shall determine the part of the financial envelopes established in paragraph 1, earmarked for the compensation referred to in Article 29d. 3. By way of derogation from Article 9(8) of this Regulation and Article 19(2) of Regulation (EU) No .../... [Regulation laying down Common Provisions], and in order to take account of changing conditions, Member States may adjust annually the list and quantities of eligible fishery products and the level of the compensation referred to in Article 29d, provided that the amounts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article are respected. Adjustments shall be possible only to the extent that they complement the compensation plans of another region of the same Member State. The Member State shall inform the Commission about the adjustments in advance. Article 29b Action plan Member States concerned shall prepare as part of their programme an action plan for each of their outermost regions, which shall set out: (a) a strategy for the sustainable exploitation of fisheries and the development of sustainable blue economy sectors; (b) a description of the main actions envisaged and the corresponding financial means, including: (i) the structural support to the fishery and aquaculture sector under Title II; (ii) the compensation for additional costs referred to in Article 29d, including the amounts of additional costs calculated by the Member State concerned and the amounts of aid estimated as compensation; (iii) any other investment in the sustainable blue economy necessary to achieve a sustainable coastal development. Article 29c Renewal of small-scale coastal fishing fleets and associated measures 1. Without prejudice to Article 16, the EMFF may support in the outermost regions: (a) the renewal of small-scale coastal fishing fleets which land all their catches in ports in the outermost regions, so as to increase human safety, comply with Union hygiene standards, fight IUU fishing and achieve greater environmental efficiency. That fishing fleet renewal shall remain within the limits of authorised capacity ceilings, must be restricted to the replacement of an old vessel by a new one, and shall allow sustainable fishing and the reaching of the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) objective; (b) the partial renovation of the structural wooden deck of a fishing vessel over 40 years old, when this is necessary for reasons of improving maritime safety, according to objective technical criteria of the naval architecture; (c) the establishment and modernisation of shipyards and shipbuilding and repair workshops located in the fishing ports of the outermost regions and whose main activity is directed at the small-scale coastal fishing fleet; (d) the study of the stability of a small coastal fishing vessel over 40 years of age, according to the recent technical criteria of naval architecture that are applicable to the new construction of fishing vessels; (e) the study of technical guidelines for the design of helmets or propulsion equipment, with respect to the different typologies of small coastal fishing vessels based in ports of the outermost regions, which help the designers to optimise the design and promotion of new constructions and of the propelling equipment, to improve the safety of the crew, reduce polluting or greenhouse emissions and increase the energy efficiency of small-scale coastal fishing fleets. Article 29d Compensation for additional costs 1. The EMFF may support the compensation of additional costs incurred by beneficiaries in the fishing, farming, processing and marketing of certain fishery and aquaculture products from the outermost regions. 2. Each Member State concerned shall determine, in line with the criteria laid down in accordance with paragraph 7, for the regions referred to in paragraph 1, the list of fishery and aquaculture products and the quantity of those products eligible for compensation. 3. When establishing the list and the quantities referred to in paragraph 2, Member States shall take into account all relevant factors, in particular the need to ensure that the compensation is compatible with the rules of the CFP. 4. The compensation shall not be granted for fishery and aquaculture products: (a) caught by third country vessels, with the exception of fishing vessels which fly the flag of Venezuela and operate in Union waters, in accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2015/1565; (b) caught by Union fishing vessels that are not registered in a port of one of the regions referred to in paragraph 1; (c) imported from third countries. 5. Point (b) of paragraph 4 shall not apply if the existing capacity of the processing industry in the outermost region concerned exceeds the quantity of raw material supplied. 6. The compensation paid to the beneficiaries carrying out activities referred to in paragraph 1 in the outermost regions or owning a vessel registered in a port of these regions shall, in order to avoid overcompensation, take into account: (a) for each fishery or aquaculture product or category of products, the additional costs resulting from the specific handicaps of the regions concerned; and (b) any other type of public intervention affecting the level of additional costs. 7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 52, laying down the criteria for the calculation of the additional costs resulting from the specific handicaps of the regions concerned. Article 29e State aid 1. For the fishery and aquaculture products, listed in Annex I to the TFEU, to which Articles 107, 108 and 109 thereof apply, the Commission may authorise, in accordance with Article 108 TFEU, operating aid in the outermost regions referred to in Article 349 TFEU within the sectors producing, processing and marketing fishery and aquaculture products, with a view to alleviating the specific constraints in those regions as a result of their isolation, insularity and extreme remoteness. 2. Member States may grant additional financing for the implementation of the compensation plans referred to in Article 29d. In such cases, Member States shall notify the Commission of the State aid which the Commission may approve in accordance with this Regulation as part of those plans. State aid thus notified shall be regarded as notified within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU. Article 29f (new) Review – POSEI The Commission shall present a report on the implementation of the provisions of this Chapter before the end of 2023 and, if necessary, come forward with appropriate proposals. The Commission shall evaluate the possibility to create a Programme of Options Specifically Relating to Remoteness and Insularity (POSEI) for maritime and fisheries issues.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 916 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support actions contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the common information sharing environment.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 919 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may support actions, carried out by national authorities, contributing to the European cooperation on coastguard functions referred to in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council35 , Article 2b of Regulation (EU) No 2016/1625 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 and Article 7a of Regulation (EU) No 2016/1626 of the European Parliament and of the Council37 . _________________ 35 Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 on the European Border and Coast Guard and amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC (OJ L 251, 16.09.2016, p. 1). 36 Regulation (EU) 2016/1625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (OJ L 251, 16.09.2016, p. 77). 37 Regulation (EU) 2016/1626 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 establishing a Community Fisheries Control Agency (OJ L 251, 16.09.2016, p. 80).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 921 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
The maximum EMFAF co-financing rate per area of support is set out in Annex II.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. In the cases of the financial corrections referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall determine the amount of the correction, which shall be proportionate, having regard to the nature, gravity, duration and repetition of the infringement or offence by the beneficiary and the importance of the EMFAF contribution to the economic activity of the beneficiary.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 933 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall decide on the amount of the correction taking into account the nature, gravity, duration and repetition of the serious non-compliance by the Member State or beneficiary with the rules of the CFP and the importance of the EMFAF contribution to the economic activity of the beneficiary concerned.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 935 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. Indicators to report on progress of the EMFAF towards the achievement of the priorities referred to in Article 4 are set out in Annex I.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 936 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. To ensure effective assessment of progress of the EMFAF towards the achievement of its priorities, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 52, to amend Annex I to review or complement the indicators where considered necessary and to supplement this Regulation with provisions on the establishment of a monitoring and evaluation framework .
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 943 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down rules for the presentation of the report referred to in paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisorymanagement procedure referred to in Article 53(2).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 945 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The EMFAF shall support the implementation of the CFP through:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) involvement of the funds of the Horizon Europe research and development programme as much as possible to support and encourage research and development and innovation activities in the fisheries and aquaculture sector;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 947 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF shall support the promotion of clean and healthy seas, including through actions to support the implementation of Directive 2008/56/EC and actions to ensure coherence with the achievement of good environmental status pursuant to Article 2(5)(j) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and the implementation of the European strategy for plastics in a circular economy.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 951 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
The EMFAF shall support the development and dissemination of market intelligence for fishery and aquaculture products by the Commission in accordance with Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 956 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 3 – chapter 3 – title
Priority 3: Enabling the growth of a sustainable blue economy and fostering prosperous coastal and waterfront communities
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – title
43 Maritime policy and development of a sustainable blue economy in seas and freshwater
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 961 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The EMFAF shall support the implementation of the maritime policy and the development of a sustainable blue economy through:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the promotion of a sustainable, low carbon and climate resilient blue economy at seas and freshwater;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the improvement of maritime skills, ocean and freshwater literacy and sharing of socio- economic data on the sustainable blue economy;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 978 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
The EMFAF shall support the promotion of maritime security and surveillance, including through data sharing, coastguard and agencies cooperation and fight against criminal and illegal activities at sea.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 979 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The EMFAF shall support the implementation of the international ocean governance policy through:
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 981 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFAF may provide funding in any of the forms laid down in Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union], in particular procurement pursuant to Title VII of that Regulation and grants pursuant to Title VIII of that Regulation. It may also provide financing in the form of financial instruments within blending operations, as referred to in Article 47.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 984 #
Blending operations under the EMFAF shall be implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on InvestEU] and Title X of Regulation (EU) No [Regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union].
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2
2. The interim evaluation of the support under Title III shall be performed once there is sufficient information available about the implementation, but not later than four years after the start of the implementation of the support. This evaluation shall take the form of a report by the Commission and provide detailed assessment of all specific aspects of the implementation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall communicate the conclusion of the evaluations, accompanied by its observations,evaluations reports referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 987 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. As appropriate, the Commission may propose amendments to this Regulation on the basis of the report referred to in paragraph 2.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 988 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall implement information and communication actions relating to the EMFF, and its actions and results. Financial resources allocated to the EMFAF shall also contribute to the corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, as far as they are related to the priorities referred to in Article 4.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 990 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee for the European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council38 . _________________ 38 Regulation (EU) 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.02.2011, p. 13).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 991 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee for the European Maritime and, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council38 . _________________ 38 Regulation (EU) 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.02.2011, p. 13).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 992 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 45 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 994 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – subheading 1
GLOBAL RESOURCES BY MEMBER STATE FOR THE EUROPEAN MARITIME AND, FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE FUND FOR THE PERIOD 2021 TO 2027
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 995 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
PRIORITY INDICATOR Fostering sustainable fisheries and the Evolution of volume of landings stemming conservation of marine biological from stocks assessed at MSY resources Evolution in profitability of the Union fishing fleet Surface (ha) of Natura 2000 sites, and other MPAs under the MSFD, covered by protection, maintenance and restoration measures Percentage of fishing vessels equipped with electronic position and catch reporting device Contributing to food security in the Union Fostering sustainable aquaculture Evolution in the value and volume of through competitive and sustainable aquaculture production in the Union aquaculture and markets Enabling the growth of a Promoting competitive and sustainable blue Evolution in the value and volume of economy and fostering prosperous coastal landings communities fisheries and aquaculture markets landings Enabling the growth of a sustainable blue Evolution of GDP in maritime NUTS 3 regionseconomy and fostering prosperous coastal regions communities Evolution in the number of jobs (in FTE) in the sustainable blue economy Strengthening international ocean Number of shared operations contributing governance and enabling safe, secure, to the European cooperation on coastguard clean and sustainably managed seas and functions oceans
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1006 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – row 12
2 a (new) Article 24 2.1 a (new).1 75% Marketing of fishery and aquaculture products
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1007 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – row 13
2 a (new) Article 25 2.1 a (new).1 75% Processing of fishery and aquaculture products
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1009 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II a (new)
Outermost Regions Area of Support MAXIMUM CO-FINANANCING RATE (% of the eligible public expenditure) Article 29 c) 85% Renewal of artisanal and small scale coastal fishing fleets and associated measures Article 29 d) 100% Compensation for additional costs for fisheries and aquaculture products
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1011 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – row 2
1 Article 16 3055% Investments in small-scale coastal fishing vessels
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – row 18 – line number 16 a (new)
16 a (new) Operations implemented 60% by collective beneficiaries
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1020 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – row 18 – line number 16 b (new)
16 b (new) Operations implemented 75% by producer organisations, associations of producer organisations, or interbranch organisations
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1021 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – row 18 – line number 16 c (new)
16 c (new) Operations that fulfil the 100% following criteria: it is of collective interest, it has a collective beneficiary and it has innovative features
2018/10/29
Committee: PECH