Activities of Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY related to 2012/2221(DEC)
Reports (1)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2011 PDF (166 KB) DOC (88 KB)
Amendments (4)
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Grants the Executive Director of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2011;
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Approves the closure of the accounts of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2011;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned that the Joint Undertaking annual accounts received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts on the grounds that the Joint Undertaking was not in a position to assess whether the ex post audit strategy provides sufficient assurance with respect to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions; reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante controls in particular for the grant management, requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex post audit processes conducted by the Joint Undertaking; expects that the Court through its independent audits will be in position to provide the discharge authority with its own opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Undertaking's ex-post audit strategy;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Joint Undertaking adopted in 2010 an ex post audit strategy that is a key control for assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and that its implementation started in 2011; notes that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities's (NFAs) of the Member States however the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for those audits; further notes the Joint Undertaking had not received sufficient information relating to the audit strategies of the NFAs; deplores that no ex-post audits had been carried out by the NFAs on the grants paid up to the end of 2011 and invites the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority on the follow up actions taken;