Activities of Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY related to 2015/2204(DEC)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (formerly the ENIAC Joint Undertaking and the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking) for the financial year 2014 PDF (285 KB) DOC (98 KB)
Amendments (3)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the Court's report is based on too many general remarks to the detriscope of the Court's specific annual report is based on the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, together with elements of viable, specific ones; therefore calls for an budgetary and financial management, internal control systems, and other matters; wishes to obtain auddit with a more accentuated focusional information on the annual financial performance, on the implementation status of multiannual projects (including a clear presentation of the implementation of the budget for the respective year and for previous years ) and the results andof its implementation;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the Joint Undertaking is of the opinion that the national procedures provide reasonable assurance with regard to the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions in spite of several reports from different Union institutions, including the discharge authority; calls on the Joint Undertaking to assess the procedures followed in order to avoid that the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions be put into ques, following the assessment of the procedures applied by the National Authorities, to invite the National Authorities to produce a written statement that the implementation inof the future and report to the discharge authority the outcome of such assessmentnational procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions24 ; __________________ 24 ECSEL AAR - p.33.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the Joint Undertaking failed to distinguish in its annual acno clear separation was made between FP 7 and Horizon 2020 implementation information due to the fact that no counts the amount of commitments and payments appropriations allocated to each FP7 and H2020; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide the discharge authority with such information27 racts relating to the implementation of H 2020 have been signed by the end of year 2014, and thus no payments have been made; asks the Court to provide separate information on budgetary implementation for FP7 and Horizon 2020 in its report for 2015; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide this information in its Report on Budgetary and Financial Management for 2015; __________________ 27 ECSEL AAR - p. 41.