BETA

7 Amendments of Marietje SCHAAKE related to 2011/2030(INI)

Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2011 on the priorities of the 16th Session of the UN Human Rights Council and the 2011 review1, 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA- PROV(2011)0097.
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Peace and, security and justice
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) to work towards achieving consensus on and developing a more operational approach towards the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (RtoP); whilst stressing its importance in preventing and peacefully mediating conflicts, to encourage the implementation of RtoP, inter alia, by strengthening the role of regional organisations such as the African Union (AU), by strengthening early-warning mechanisms within the UN and the UN's mediation capacities like the Mediation Support Unit (MSU) of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), and by better defining the roles of relevant UN bodies; welcomes UNSC Resolution S/2011/95 1970(2011)of 26 February 2011, in which called on the Government of Libya to meet its responsibility to protect its population, the very first time that the RtoP doctrine has been mentioned in a formal UNSC statement in reference to an ongoing crisis, for the very first time all permanent members of the Security Council agreed to call on the International Criminal Court to open an inquiry against an acting government on the basis of alleged crimes against humanity and in the name of the RtoP doctrine in reference to an ongoing crisis; equally welcomes UNSC Resolution 1973(2011) in which the Security Council authorised the protection of the population and a no-fly zone over Libya under the concept of RtoP; regrets however that still far too many lives have been destroyed in this less then perfect process; strongly believes that the mechanisms for the application of the RtoP have to be further refined; emphasizes that the recourse to military force must clearly be the very last resort, and that the formal procedures and mediation efforts to be applied should be strenghtened in the future,
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point -l a (new)
International Criminal Justice (-la) to consider it an EU priority to further strengthen the international criminal justice system, to promote accountability and to put an end to impunity, to further promote the important work of the ICC as the only permanent and independent judicial institution with jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of international concern, covering genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes; to encourage a strong and close relationship between the ICC and the UN in line with Article 2 of the Rome Statute, and to encourage the global ratification of the Rome Statute,
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) to ensure that the EEAS is well-staffed and well-resourced as well as integrated and coordinated with other international bodies, regional organisations and their work in promoting human rights; to ensure that recommendations, concerns and priorities expressed within the UN system and other international institutions are fully and systematically integrated into all EU policy fields and instruments, and the human rights field in particular,
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) to prepare for and actively participate in the review of the HRC and the follow-up to that review; to address the HRC's ability to tackle urgent situations involving serious human rights violations, to improve its capacity to implement existing international norms and standards and enhance its role as an early-warning and preventive mechanism able to prioritise and address the root causes of human rights violations with the aim of preventing fresh or further escalation of human rights violations, including through its support for capacity building for national human rights institutions; to seek ways of improving the HRC's election procedures in order to address the issue of the quality of HRC membership; to develop a viable working relationship between the HRC and the Third Committee, and between the HRC and the UNHCR ; to commend the General Assembly's decision of 1 March 2011, by the adoption of GA/11050, to suspend Libya's membership of the UNHRC,
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) to continue its endeavours in the UNGA Third Committee on a large number of resolutions, in particular on the call for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, which has received support from more countries, on the rights of the child, on freedom of expression and free media, on religious intolerance and, on abolishing torture and on the country-specific resolutions on Burma/Myanmar, North Korea and Iran,
2011/04/04
Committee: AFET