BETA

23 Amendments of Marietje SCHAAKE related to 2015/2315(INI)

Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas there is a serious and concrete risk of corporate practices resulting in forced labour, and sexual and child exploitation;deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas a significant number of corporations operating in third countriesmany internationally active corporations have substantial business operations or are based in Europe, arnd/or may be owned by European corporations, have assets or goods in Europe or control other corporations in Europe; whereas there is a practice whereby European corporations outsource activities to globalisation and the development of technology has led to increasingly glocbal suppliers or use goods or services iny chains, meaning that their production chains that have been produced or provided by other corporations in countries where human rights standards are lowerprocesses increasingly take place in many different countries and therefore jurisdictions, with different legal systems, different levels of human rights protections and standards and different levels orf enforcement and victim protection are legally or factually lacking;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas, where human rights are breached, appropriate and effective remedies are required; whereas a fairer and more effective remedies system is needed under domestic law to deal with human rights violations committed by business enterpriss require appropriate and effective remedies;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Is deeply concerned at the human rights violations committedNotes that increasing globalisation and internationalisation of business activities and supply chains creates a situation in which international norms, rules and cooperation are crucial to avoid the human rights abuses in third countries by corporations and business enterprises;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that continuing globalisation underlines the urgency of enforceable CSR and the role that corporations play in ensuring respect for human rights will become more important;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that the rapid advances in technology are leading to an increasing privatisation of law enforcement, especially online, which requires urgent attention and a proper legal framework;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms the urgent need to act in a continuous, effective and coherent manner at all levels, including at the international and, European Union and national level, in order to effectively address the legal problems resulting from the extra-territorial dimension of companies and of their conduct, and the related uncertainty as to where the liability for human rights violations lieshuman rights abuses by international corporations when they appear and to address the legal problems and uncertainties around this issue;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on companies to integratmake sure theat findings of their human rights due diligence processes are actually translated into policies and procedures, withich aresources and authority assigned accordingly, and to communicate their commitment and actions externally, in order to identify, prevent and mitigate any negative human rights impact of their activities duly implemented; stresses that this requires sufficient resources to be allocated;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses that transparency and communication on measures taken to avoid human rights abuses in third countries are crucial to allow proper democratic oversight and to allow consumers to make fact-based choices;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises the major importance of CSR and welcomes the growing use of instruments based on CSR and the self- commitment by corporations; strongly emphasises, however, that avoiding violationabuses of human rights is not a matter of charity or something to be done on a voluntary basis but a legal obligation on enterprises and their management, wherever they maya moral obligation, wherever companies are active and whatever their size or industrial sector;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that, if companies should take moral responsibility if they find that they have caused or contributed to harm, they must provide for or participate in effective remedy processes for the individuals and communities affected;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for policy coherence on business and human rights at all levels: within different EU institutions, between the institutions, and between the EU and its Member States; notes that this will require intensive cooperation between different Directorates General within the Commission and the European External Action Service;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on all national and international authoritithe Member States to ensure that binding instruments devoted to the effective protection of human rights in this fieldrd countries are adopted as a matter of urgency and as widely as possible, and that all obligations stemming from the abovementioned international rules are enforced; hopes that European efforts on CSR can be a model for other countries;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to implement the UNGPs swiftly and robustly, including by developing National Action Plans; deplores that, notwithstanding the Commission's 2001 CSR communication, only a fewnot all Member States have adopted CSR statements or policies that mention human rights or have published their plans on business and human rights;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States to lay down clear requirements as to the factules that companies domicilestablished in their territory and/or jurisdiction must respect human rights throughout their operations, in every country and context in which they operate; considers that they should ensure that they have systems in place to assess risks and mitigate potential negative impacts related to human rights, labour, environmental protection and disaster-related aspects of their operations and value chains, and periodically assess the adequacy of such laws and address any shortcomings;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States to compel companies that usework towards responsible sourcing for raw materials orand commodities that might, especially those originate ing from conflict-affected areas (for example, so- called conflict minerals) to disclose their sourcing and use of such materials;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Member States to take any appropriate steps to ensure, through judicial, administrative, legislative or other appropriate means, that when such human rights violations occur, those affected have access to an effective remedy, piercing the veil of the legal personality, when a corporation based in the EU holds, directs or controls companies that are responsible for human rights violations in third countries; calls on the Member States to take appropriate steps to reduce legal, practical and other relevant barriers that could lead to a denial of access to remedy;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the non-binding private sector initiatives for responsible supply chain management introduced by the Commission's services, but stresses that non-binding private sector initiatives are by themselves not sufficient; calls for urgent binding and enforceable rules and related sanctions and independent monitoring mechanisms;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Strongly calls for the systematic inclusion in trade and investment agreements of rules on corporate liability for violations of human rights, to be implemented at national level, and of references to internationally recognised principles and guidelines; notes that trade agreements in general can contribute to reinforcing the global rules-based trading system and that trade and values must go hand in hand, as recently outlined by the European Commission in its new trade strategy 'Trade for All';
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Calls on the Commission to urgently come forward with a legislative proposal for the export control of dual use items, since technologies made by European companies are still being used for human rights violations all over the world;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for the establishment of a necessity forum (forum necessitatis), which would allow claims to be brought before the courts of the Member States in situations where there would be a risk of denial of justice if no access to court were foreseen in the EU, where proceedings proved impossible in a third country, or where an applicant could not reasonably be expected to initiate or conduct proceedings in that state and the dispute had a sufficient connection with the Member State of the court seized;deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Recalls that, when human rights violations are perpetrated by corporations, this action oftenmay involves personal criminal liability and calls for those responsible for such crimes to be prosecuted at whatever level;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Recommends the creation of an ‘abuse-free’Notes that the use of clear and transparent labelling of products brand at EU level, participation in which would be on a voluntary basis, monitored by an independent body governed by strict rules and endowed with powers of inspection, devoted to verifying and certifying that no abuse has been committed at any stage in the chain of production of the relevant goodproper information supply to consumers is crucial, with proper oversight and inspection by independent bodies;
2016/04/28
Committee: AFET