7 Amendments of Daniël van der STOEP related to 2010/2154(INI)
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that any counterterrorism measure should therefore be in full accordance with the fundamental rights and obligations of the European Union Member States, which are necessary in a democratic society and must be proportionate, prescribed by law and thus delimited within the specific aim it wishes to achieve;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the fact that the use of body scanners is not restricted only to airports but also to other public places; urges therefore that the Commission present a proposal covering the deployment and use of security scanners in places other than airports;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that every person shcould have the right to refuse a body scan, without the obligation to give anyalbeit provided that they give a demonstrably sound explanation, and must have the right to request a standard security check, with full respect for the rights and dignity of that person; calls in this regard for all security personnel to receive proper, extensive training;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the reasons stated for refusaling to undergo a body scan should not constitute ipso facto any suspicion of the person concerned and that,may be investigated; takes the view that any form of profiling in the procedure before being submitted to a body scan or related to the refusal of a body scan, any form of profiling based on, for example, sex, race, colour, ethnicity, genetic features, language, religion or belief is unacceptdesirable;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for people who are willing to be submitted to a body scan to be properly and comprehensibly informed about the body scanner, including their right to refuse to be submitted to a body scan and their right to complain and seek redress in case of perceived irregularities related to the body scan or their refusal to be submitted to it and the subsequent standard security check;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that any proposal to allow the deployment and use of body scanners as a permissible screening method should be extensively justified in an impact assessment covering inter alia the fundamental rights aspect of body scanners and the possible health risks, taking into account the opinions of the European Union, international and national human rights and data protection authorities, such as the EDPS, the FRA and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Protection of Human Rights while Countering Terrorismpossible health risks associated with body scanners;