4 Amendments of Liem HOANG NGOC related to 2011/2117(INI)
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Proposes that a single European charter be drawn up containingSuggests that the Commission’s future legislative proposal on the use of ADR in the EU incorporate the guidelines to be followed in relation to ADR systems established in Europe, these being the following:
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 5
Paragraph 6 – indent 5
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 6
Paragraph 6 – indent 6
– freedom of choice and out-of-court nature: ADR must be optional and based on respect for the parties’ freedom of choice throughout the process, allowing them the possibility of choosing, at any time, to settle their dispute before the courts; it must not under any circumstances constitute an initial compulsory sparties having recourse to ADR must be able to decide, at any time, to end the process and settle their dispute before the courts; a contractual agreement between the parties may provide for automatic recourse to an ADR system in the event of a disputep, prior to the initiation ofovided that it does not preclude either party from bringing legal proceedings, and the; decisions stemming from itADR can be binding only if the parties have been informed to that effect beforehand and expressly agree to it;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Emphasises the role of consumer groups in conducting awareness-raising campaigns on the existence of ADR mechanisms and pointing consumers who contact them about consumer disputes towards those mechanisms;