Activities of Marta ANDREASEN related to 2010/2144(DEC)
Plenary speeches (2)
2009 discharge: Council (debate)
2009 discharge (debate)
Amendments (3)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas - regarding the Council's argument of reciprocity - the fact that Parliament discharges itself is indeed an anomaly that needs to be addressed inter- institutionally,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – introductory part
Paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Reiterates that the expenditure of the Council ought to be scrutinised in the same way as that of the other Union institutions, although the fact that the Parliament discharges itself is an anomaly that needs to be addressed, and suggests that the most appropriate approach would be as expressed in its above-mentioned resolution of 16 June 2010, in particular, that ‘such scrutiny is based on the following written documents submitted by all institutions:
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes the proposal on the organisation of relations between the Parliament and the Council regarding their respective budgets, as annexed to the letter of Secretary- General of the Council of 30 September 2010; does not share the standpoint of that proposal, and believes that a distinction should be maintained with regard to the different roles ofnotes that in the absence of openness from the Parliament andtowards the Council in the discharge procedure and in the budgetary procedure; notes that, the Council Presidency and the General Secretariat of the Council declined to attend the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure and to provide information and answers to questions on the Council discharge for the financial year 2009, as well as to provide written replies to the questionnaire as submitted by the rapporteur; believes that further efforts should be made in order to reach a mutually acceptable solution;