3 Amendments of Julie GIRLING related to 2013/2221(DEC)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. RecogniStresses the comments made by the Court of Auditors which focus on the legality and regularity of transactions, on the internal controls and on budgetary management; is at the same time also aware of the Centre's reply; welcomes that the Centre itself has informed the Court in October 2011 regarding the exceedance of the payment ceiling of the framework contract and seeking advice and guidance in this matter with the spirit of full transparency; considers the immediate measures taken by the Centre as appropriate in terms of business continuity as well as corrective actions; takes note that no funds were lost and no parties were damaged; notes that the Centre has revised its grant verification policy in order to ensure the eligibility and accuracy of the costs claimed; is aware of the multi-annual activities of the Centre which caused carry- overs of EUR 8.3 million; asks nevertheless the Centre to respect the annuality principle of the budget;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that the discharge decision should be based upon OECD guidelines to ensure high quality internationally recognised accounting, audit and financial disclosure standards; invites the European institutions to incorporate and commit to introducing OECD guidelines within a common framework for all European institutions and bodies;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends on the facts available that discharge canshould not be granted to the Executive Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2012.