6 Amendments of Julie GIRLING related to 2015/2065(INI)
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Agrees with the Commission that a single solution approach is not sufficient to address the issue of UTPs;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Questions the Commission’s unwavering support for the SCI, given the reluctance of farmers to participate; regrets the pre- emptive conclusion that regulatory action at EU level is not foreseenCommission's reluctance to negotiate on the issues of anonymity and sanctions;
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to assess the voluntary schemes currently in place and the effectiveness of regulatory actions taken at national level;
Amendment 136 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of coordination and exchange of best practice at EU level, in order to ensure a successful approach to tackling the serious issue of UTPs and the proper functioning of the single market whilst ensuring a completive and fair supply chain;
Amendment 142 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 157 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that framework legislation at EU level is esAsks the Commission to assess the occurrences of retail price senttial to tackle UTPs and to address their negative consequences for farmers; ng below cost of production and consider what action and resourgces the Commission to consider this when assessingare needed to eliminate this practice across the SCIEU;