7 Amendments of Julie GIRLING related to 2016/2114(REG)
Amendment 992 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 73 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Rule 73 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Such negotiations shall not be entered into prior to the adoption by the committee responsibleParliament, on a case-by-case basis for every legislative procedure concerned and by a majority of its members, of a decision on the opening of negotiations. That decision shall determine the mandate and the composition of the negotiating team. Such decisions shall be notified to the President, who shall keep the Conference of Presidents informed on a regular basis.
Amendment 993 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 73 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Rule 73 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The mandate shall consist of a reportext adopted in committee and tabled for later consideration by Parliament. By way of exception, where the committee responsible considers it duly justified to enter into negotiations prior to the adoption of a report in committee, the mandate may consist of a set of amendments or a set of clearly defined objectives, priorities or orientationsby Parliament.
Amendment 1018 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 105 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Rule 105 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In the interest of consistency and democracy, the committees shall develop harmonised procedures for dealing with objections to delegated acts and for attendance at expert meetings relating to the preparation of delegated acts.
Amendment 1022 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 106 – paragraph 2
Rule 106 – paragraph 2
2. The committee responsible may table a reasonedIn the case of implementing measures falling under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for by Council Decision 1999/468/EC laying down procedures for the exercise of the implementing powers conferred on the Commission, the committee responsible may, in accordance with Article 5a (3)(b) and (4)(e) of that Decision, table a motion for a resolution stating that athe draft implementing act or measure goes beyond the implementing powers provided for in the basic legislative act or is not consistent with Union law in other respemeasures proposed by the Commission exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument or that the draft is not compatible with the aim or content of the basic instrument or does not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality. In case of implementing acts falling under Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers, where the corresponding basic act was adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, the committee responsible may , in accordance with Article 11 of that Regulation, table a reasoned motion for a resolution stating that a draft implementing act exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic acts.
Amendment 1023 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 106 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Rule 106 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where a draft motion for resolution referred to in paragraph 2 is justified on grounds other than those provided for in that paragraph, the coordinators of the committee responsible may dismiss the objection.
Amendment 1024 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Rule 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In the interest of consistency and democracy, the committees shall develop harmonised procedures for dealing with objections to implementing acts and measures.
Amendment 1072 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 136
Rule 136