BETA

12 Amendments of Luís Paulo ALVES related to 2011/0276(COD)

Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The Commission should adopt by delegated act a Common Strategic Framework which translates the objectives of the Union into key actions for the CSF Funds, in order to provide clearer strategic direction to the programming process at the level of Member States and regions. The Common Strategic Framework should facilitate sectoral and territorial coordination of Union intervention under the CSF Funds and with other relevant Union policies and instruments, taking into account the principle of territoriality and governance at various levels, and the specific characteristics recognised in Article 349 TFEU with regard to the outermost regions.
2012/05/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) On the basis of the Common Strategic Framework adopted by the Commission, each Member State should prepare, in cooperation with its partners and in dialogue with the Commission, should prepare a Partnership Contract, at the appropriate territorial level and in line with the respective institutional, legal and financial framework. The Partnership Contract should translate the elements set out in the Common Strategic Framework into the national context and set out firm commitments to the achievement of Union objectives through the programming of the CSF Funds.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Establishing a closer link between cohesion policy and the economic governance of the Union will ensure that the effectiveness of expenditure under the CSF Funds is underpinned by sound economic policies and that the CSF Funds can, if necessary, be redirected to addressing the economic problems a country is facing. This process has to be gradual, starting with amendments to the Partnership Contract and to the programmes in support of Council recommendations to address macroeconomic imbalances and social and economic difficulties. Where, despite the enhanced use of CSF Funds, a Member State fails to take effective action in the context of the economic governance process, the Commission should have the right to suspend all or part of the payments and commitments. Decisions on suspensions should be proportionate and effective, taking into account the impact of the individual programmes for addressing the economic and social situation in the relevant Member State and previous amendments to the Partnership Contract. When deciding on suspensions, the Commission should also respect equality of treatment between Member States, taking into account in particular the impact of the suspension on the economy of the Member State concerned. The suspensions should be lifted and funds be made available again to the Member State concerned as soon as the Member State takes the necessary action.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall prepare a Partnership Contract, at the appropriate territorial level, in accordance with the relevant institutional, legal and financial framework, for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The Partnership Contract shall be drawn up by Member States in cooperation with thIn Member States where national legislation or administrative partners referred to in Article 5. The Partnership Contract shall be prepared in dialogue with the Commissionrangements give regions and local authorities a role in implementing operational programmes, they shall participate fully in preparing the Partnership Contract.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
i) an analysis of disparities and development needs with reference to the thematic objectives and key actions defined in the Common Strategic Framework and the targets set in the country-specific recommendations under Article 121(2) of the Treaty and the relevant Council recommendations adopted under Article 148(4) of the Treaty, in addition to Article 349 of the TFEU and the Council Recommendations of 2011 on the outermost regions;
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall assess whether the applicable ex ante conditionalities are fulfilled, in compliance with the division of competencies between different levels of government.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 4
4. Member States, at the appropriate territorial level, in accordance with the relevant institutional, legal and financial framework, shall set out the detailed actions relating to the fulfilment of ex ante conditionalities, including the timetable for their implementation, in the relevant programmes.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii
iii) the list of cities where integrated actions for sustainable urban development will be implemented,will be implemented. This list shall be drawn up in partnership with the local and regional authorities, regarding the particular institutional systems of each Member State to ensure equal access for all local authorities that want to implement integrated urban interventions; the indicative annual allocation of the ERDF support for these actions, including the resources delegated to cities for management under Article 7(2) of Regulation(EU) No […] [ERDF] and the indicative annual allocation of ESF support for integrated actions.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1608 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The co-financing rate at the level of each pof operational programmes under the European territority axis ofal cooperation goal shall be no higher than 85 %. For operational programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal shall be no higher than 75 %. where at least one participant belongs to a Member State whose average GDP per capita for the 2001–2003 period was less than 85 % of the average of the EU-25 during the same period, the ERDF contribution shall not exceed 85 % of eligible expenditure. For all other operational programmes, the ERDF contribution shall not exceed 75 % of eligible expenditure co-financed by the ERDF. The support from funds at the level of each priority axis is fixed by ensuring compliance with the maximum amount of support from funds and the maximum contribution rate of each fund established at the level of each operational programme.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1636 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c A (new)
(c A) other areas with severe and permanent demographic handicaps.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1758 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 134 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) there is evidence resulting from a performance review that a priority axis has failed to achieve the milestones set out in the performance framework;deleted
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI