Activities of Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ related to 2013/2079(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Carbon capture and storage technology (debate)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on implementation report 2013: developing and applying carbon capture and storage technology in Europe PDF (207 KB) DOC (97 KB)
Amendments (15)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas with current levels of use of fossil fuels and future projections for this, CCS would seem to be essential to achieving the target of keeping the rise in global temperatures below 2°C;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas developments in carbon capture and storage should not in any way be to the detriment of achieving the EU's mandatory renewables development target;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B c (new)
Recital B c (new)
Bc. whereas development of carbon capture and storage should be regarded as a strategy that is complementary to development of renewables in the transition to a low carbon economy;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas development of this technology should not serve as an incentive to increase the share of fossil fuel power plants;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that CCS deployment is needed for the EU to meet its 2050 low- carbon aspirations at least cost; affirms the urgent need to develop a range of full- chain CCS flagship projects; appreciates that instruments in addition to the EU ETS are needed to drive forward their development; believes that, for their development, other instruments need to be found which can foster research and technical development in the CCS technology field;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises the importance of deploying CCS in certain industrial processes such as metallurgy, iron and steel, and the cement industry where it can profitably contribute to radical reductions in industrial emissions in the medium term;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes the decision by certain Member States not to include CCS in their emissions reduction strategies, but points out that this ought not to prevent it being developed by those Member States which consider this technology to be valid and effective in the transition to a low carbon economy provided it can be deployed in a way that is safe for the environment.
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that Member States wishing to carry out CCS projects on their territory need to have the key role in providing a transparent revenue stream, such as feed-in tariffs, to support the construction and operation of flagship projects while enabling operators to secure a return on their investment, and in introducing regulatory requirements such as guarantees that first-mover CCS power plants provide baseload electricity generation;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Mentions again the rules on responsibility for storage of CO2 laid down in the CCS Directive and the obligations incumbent upon holders of a storage permit;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Points out that the rules on responsibility for storage of CO2 laid down in the CCS Directive ought not to have a dissuasive effect on investments;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission to study the possibility of setting emissions standards for future fossil fuel power plants;