BETA

91 Amendments of Carmen ROMERO LÓPEZ related to 2011/0023(COD)

Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive
Title 1
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the use of Passenger Name Record data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) The Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) of 25 March 2011, and particularly paragraphs 7 to 16 and 25, 55, and 57, stated that the proposed Directive did not meet the essential prerequisite of any development of a PNR scheme, i.e. compliance with the necessity and proportionality principles, to the extent that the EDPS questioned the inclusion in the proposal of serious crimes which have no link with terrorism.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) Opinion 10/2011 of the Article 29 Working Party adopted on 5 April 2011 stating that there was a lack of information on the effectiveness and appropriateness of existing EU systems and tools for police and judicial co- operation to fight terrorism and organised crime, questioned the necessity of such a proposal and expressed serious doubts about the proportionality of the collection of a huge amount of personal information on passengers regardless of whether or not they are suspects.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) PNR data may help law enforcement authorities prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute serious crimes, including acts of terrorism, by comparing them with various databases of persons and objects sought, to construct evidence and, where relevant, to find associates of criminals and unravel criminal networksacts of terrorism.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) PNR data enable law enforcement authorities to identify persons who were previously 'unknown', i.e. persons previously unsuspected of involvement in serious crime and terrorism, but whom an analysis of the data suggests may be involved in such crime and who should therefore be subject to further examination by the competent authorities. By using PNR data law enforcement authorities can address the threat of serious crime and terrorism from a different perspective than through the processing of other categories of personal data. However, in order to ensure that the processing of data of innocent and unsuspected persons remains as limited as possible, the aspects of the use of PNR data relating to the creation and application of assessment criteria should be further limited to sterious crimrorist offences that are also transnational in nature, i.e. are intrinsically linked to travelling and hence the type of the data being processed.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) To prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime, it is therefore essential that all Member States introduce provisions laying down obligations on air carriers operating international flights to or from the territory of the Member States of the European Union.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The definition of terrorist offences should be taken from Articles 1 to 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. The definition of serous crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States. However, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organised Crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) PNR data should be transferred to a single designated unit (Passenger Information Unit) in the relevant Member State, so as to ensure clarity and reduce costs to air carriers. The general budget of the European Union should, where necessary, provide financial support for the Member States or the passenger airlines to cover the cost of establishing, running and maintaining their own PNR systems, and transferring PNR data.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The contents of any lists of required PNR data to be obtained by the Passenger Information Unit should be drawn up with the objective of reflecting the legitimate requirements of public authorities to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences or serious crime, thereby improving internal security within the Union as well as protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, notably privacy and the protection of personal data. Such lists should not contain any personal data that could reveal racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership or data concerning health or sexual life of the individual concerned. The PNR data should contain details on the passenger's reservation and travel itinerary which enable competent authorities to identify air passengers representing a threat to internal security.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Each Member State should be responsible for assessing the potential threats related to terrorist offences and serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should share with other Member States the PNR data that they receive where such transfer is necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime. The provisions of this Directive should be without prejudice to other Union instruments on the exchange of information between police and judicial authorities, including Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)39 and Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 September 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union. Such exchange of PNR data between law enforcement and judicial authorities should be governed by the rules on police and judicial cooperation.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The period during which PNR data are to be retained should be proportionate to the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime. Because of the nature of the data and their uses, it is necessary that the PNR data are retained for a sufficiently long period for carrying out analysis and for use in investigations. In order to avoid disproportionate use, it is necessary that, after an initial period, the data are anonymised and only accessible under very strict and limited conditions.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) This Directive does not affect the possibility for Member States to provide, under their domestic law, for a system of collection and handling of PNR data for purposes other than those specified in this Directive, or from transportation providers other than those specified in the Directive, regarding internal flights subject to compliance with relevant data protection provisions, provided that such domestic law respects the Union acquis. The issue of the collection of PNR data on internal flights should be the subject of specific reflection at a future date.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) As a result of the legal and technical differences between national provisions concerning the processing of personal data, including PNR, air carriers are and will be faced with different requirements regarding the types of information to be transmitted, as well as the conditions under which this information needs to be provided to competent national authorities. These differences may be prejudicial to effective cooperation between the competent national authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime according to Article 4(2)(b) and (c); and;
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime according to Article 4(2)(a) and (d).deleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘serious crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, however, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality;deleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – introductory part
(i) ‘serious transnational crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, and if : (i) They are committed in more than one state; (ii) They are committed in one state but a substantial part of their preparation, planning, direction or control takes place in another state; (iii) They are committed in one state but involve an organised criminal group that engages in criminal activities in more than one state; or (iv) They are committed in one state but have substantial effects in another state.deleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – point i
(i) They are committed in more than one state;deleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – point ii
(ii) They are committed in one state but a substantial part of their preparation, planning, direction or control takes place in another state;deleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – point iii
(iii) They are committed in one state but involve an organised criminal group that engages in criminal activities in more than one state; ordeleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – point iv
(iv) They are committed in one state but have substantial effects in another state.deleted
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up or designate an authority competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime or a branch of such an authority to act as its 'Passenger Information Unit' responsible for collecting PNR data from the air carriers, storing them, analysing them and transmitting the result of the analysis to the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. Its staff members may be seconded from competent public authorities.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. In carrying out such an assessment the Passenger Information Unit may compare PNR data against relevant databases, including international or national databases or national mirrors of Union databases, where they are established on the basis of Union law, on persons or objects sought or under alert, in accordance with Union, international and national rules applicable to such files. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action;
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) responding, on a case-by-case basis, to duly reasoned requests from competent authorities to provide PNR data and process PNR data in specific cases for the purpose of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious crime, and to provide the competent authorities with the results of such processing; and
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) analysing PNR data for the purpose of updating or creating new criteria for carrying out assessments in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime pursuant to point (a).
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2 shall be carried out in a non- discriminatory manner on the basis of common assessment criteria established by its Passenger Information Unit. Member States shall ensure that the assessment criteria are set by the Passenger Information Units, in cooperation with the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. The assessment criteria shall in no circumstances be based on a person's race or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member or a group of Member States State shall transfer the PNR data or the results of the processing of PNR data of the persons identified in accordance with points (a) and (b) of paragraph 2 for further examination to the relevant competent authorities of the same Member State. Such transfers shall only be made on a case-by- case basis.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall adopt a list of the competent authorities entitled to request or receive PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data from the Passenger Information Units in order to examine that information further or take appropriate action for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences and serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities shall consist of authorities competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive
Title
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the use of Passenger Name Record data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The PNR data of passengers and the result of the processing of PNR data received by the Passenger Information Unit may be further processed by the competent authorities of the Member States only for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating or prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authorities shall not take any decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person or significantly affects a person only by reason of the automated processing of PNR data. Such decisions shall not be taken on the basis of a person's race or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 16, 82(1)(d) and 87(2)(a) thereof,
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) If the flight does not take off due to force majeure or any other unforeseen circumstance and the travel is cancelled, the PNR data which have been transferred to the Passenger Information Unit shall be deleted immediately.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) of 25 March 2011, and particularly paragraphs 7 to 16 and 25, 55, and 57, expressed the opinion that the initial proposal for a Directive did not meet the essential prerequisite of any development of a PNR scheme- i.e. compliance with the necessity and proportionality principles, to the extent that the EDPS questions the inclusion in the proposal of serious crimes which have no link with terrorism.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. On a case-by-case basis, upon request from a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with national law, air carriers shall transfer PNR data where access earlier than that mentioned in point (a) of paragraph 2 is necessary to assist in responding to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) Opinion 10/2011 of the Article 29 Working Party adopted on 5 April 2011 stated that there was a lack of information on the effectiveness and appropriateness of existing EU systems and tools for police and judicial co-operation to fight terrorism and organised crime, and questioned the necessity of such a proposal and expressed serious doubts about the proportionality of the collection of a huge amount of personal information on passengers regardless of whether or not they are suspects.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, with regard to persons identified by a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with Article 4(2)(a) and (b), the result of the processing of PNR data is transmitted by that Passenger Information Unit to the Passenger Information Units of other Member States where the former Passenger Information Unit considers such transfer to be necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime. The Passenger Information Units of the receiving Member States shall transmit such PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data to their relevant competent authorities..
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(1), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The request for such data may be based on any one or a combination of data elements, as deemed necessary by the requesting Passenger Information Unit for a specific case of prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime. Passenger Information Units shall provide the requested data as soon as practicable and shall provide also the result of the processing of PNR data, if it has already been prepared pursuant to Article 4(2)(a) and (b).
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(2), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The Passenger Information Unit may request access to specific PNR data kept by the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State in their full form without the masking out only in exceptional circumstances in response to a specific threat or a specific investigation or prosecution related to terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State or a group of Member States shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(2), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The Passenger Information Unit may request access to specific PNR data kept by the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State in their full form without the masking out only in exceptional circumstances in response to a specific threat or a specific investigation or prosecution related to terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Only in those cases where it is necessary for the prevention of an immediate and serious threat to public security may the competent authorities of a Member State request directly the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2). Such requests shall relate to a specific investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime and shall be reasoned. Passenger Information Units shall respond to such requests as a matter of priority. In all other cases the competent authorities shall channel their requests through the Passenger Information Unit of their own Member State.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Exceptionally, where early access is necessary to respond to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime, the Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State to provide it with PNR data of flights landing in or departing from the latter's territory at any time.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that air carriers, their agents or other ticket sellers for the carriage of passengers on air service inform passengers of international flights at the time of booking a flight and at the time of purchase of a ticket in a clear and precise manner about the provision of PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit, the purposes of their processing, the period of data retention, their possible use to prevent, detect, investigate or prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime, the possibility of exchanging and sharing such data and their data protection rights, in particular the right to complain to a national data protection supervisory authority of their choice. The same information shall be made available by the Member States to the public.
2012/04/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) PNR data armay be necessary to effectively prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime and thus enhance internal security.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) PNR data may help law enforcement authorities prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute serious crimes, including acts of terrorism, by comparing them with various databases of persons and objects sought, to construct evidence and, where relevant, to find associates of criminals and unravel criminal networksacts of terrorism.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) PNR data enable law enforcement authorities to identify persons who were previously ‘unknown’, i.e. persons previously unsuspected of involvement in serious crime and terrorism, but whom an analysis of the data suggests may be involved in such crime and who should therefore be subject to further examination by the competent authorities. By using PNR data law enforcement authorities can address the threat of serious crime and terrorism from a different perspective than through the processing of other categories of personal data. However, in order to ensure that the processing of data of innocent and unsuspected persons remains as limited as possible, the aspects of the use of PNR data relating to the creation and application of assessment criteria should be further limited to serious crimes that are also transnational in nature, i.e. are intrinsically linked to travelling and hence the type of the data being processed i.e. terrorism.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) To prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime, it is therefore essential that all Member States introduce provisions laying down obligations on air carriers operating international flights to or from the territory of the Member States of the European Union.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The definition of terrorist offences should be taken from Articles 1 to 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. The definition of serous crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States. However, Member States mayshould exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organised Crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The definition of terrorist offences should be taken from Articles 1 to 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. The definition of serous crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States. However, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality. The definition of serious transnational crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organised Crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The contents of any lists of required PNR data to be obtained by the Passenger Information Unit should be drawn up with the objective of reflecting the legitimate requirements of public authorities to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences or serious crime, thereby improving internal security within the Union as well as protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, notably privacy and the protection of personal data. Such lists should not contain any personal data that could reveal racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership or data concerning health or sexual life of the individual concerned. The PNR data should contain details on the passenger's reservation and travel itinerary which enable competent authorities to identify air passengers representing a threat to internal security.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Each Member State should be responsible for assessing the potential threats related to terrorist offences and serious crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should share with other Member States the PNR data that they receive where such transfer is necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime. The provisions of this Directive should be without prejudice to other Union instruments on the exchange of information between police and judicial authorities, including Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) and Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 September 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union. Such exchange of PNR data between law enforcement and judicial authorities should be governed by the rules on police and judicial cooperation.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The period during which PNR data are to be retained should be proportionate to the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime. Because of the nature of the data and their uses, it is necessary that the PNR data are retained for a sufficiently long period for carrying out analysis and for use in investigations. In order to avoid disproportionate use, it is necessary that, after an initial period, the data are anonymised and only accessible under very strict and limited conditions.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) This Directive does not affect the possibility for Member States to provide, under their domestic law, for a system of collection and handling of PNR data for purposes other than those specified in this Directive, or from transportation providers other than those specified in the Directive, regarding internal flights subject to compliance with relevant data protection provisions, provided that such domestic law respects the Union acquis. The issue of the collection of PNR data on internal flights should be the subject of specific reflection at a future date.deleted
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) This Directive does not affect the possibility for Member States to provide, under their domestic law, for a system of collection and handling of PNR data for purposes other than those specified in this Directive, or from transportation providers other than those specified in the Directive, regarding internal flights subject to compliance with relevant data protection provisions, provided that such domestic law respects the Union acquis. The issue of the collection of PNR data on internal flights should be the subject of specific reflection at a future date.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) As a result of the legal and technical differences between national provisions concerning the processing of personal data, including PNR, air carriers are and will be faced with different requirements regarding the types of information to be transmitted, as well as the conditions under which this information needs to be provided to competent national authorities. These differences may be prejudicial to effective cooperation between the competent national authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and the principles of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular the right to the protection of personal data, the right to privacy and the right to non-discrimination as protected by Articles 8, 7 and 21 of the Charter and has to be implemented accordingly. The Directive is compatible with data protection principles, in particular Article 16 TFEU, and its provisions are in line with the Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. Furthermore, and in order to comply with the proportionality principle, the Directive, on specific issues, will have stricter rules on data protection than the Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) In particular, the scope of the Directive is as limited as possible, it allows retention of PNR data for period of time not exceeding 5three years, after which the data must be deleted, the data must be anonymised after a very short period, the collection and use of sensitive data is prohibited. In order to ensure efficiency and a high level of data protection, Member States are required to ensure that an independent national supervisory authority is responsible for advising and monitoring how PNR data are processed. All processing of PNR data must be logged or documented for the purpose of verification of the lawfulness of the data processing, self-monitoring and ensuring proper data integrity and security of the data processing. Member States must also ensure that passengers are clearly and precisely informed about the collection of PNR data and their rights.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime according to Article 4(2)(b) and (c); and.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime according to Article 4(2)(a) and (d).deleted
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This Directive shall not apply to air carriers operating passenger flights within the territory of the Union.
2012/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘serious crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, however, Member States may exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principle of proportionality;deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘serious crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, however, Member States mayshall exclude those minor offences for which, taking into account their respective criminal justice system, the processing of PNR data pursuant to this directive would not be in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity;
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) ‘serious transnational crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, and if : (i) They are committed in more than one state; (ii) They are committed in one state but a substantial part of their preparation, planning, direction or control takes place in another state; (iii) They are committed in one state but involve an organised criminal group that engages in criminal activities in more than one state; or (iv) They are committed in one state but have substantial effects in another state.deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up or designate an authority competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime or a branch of such an authority to act as its ‘Passenger Information Unit’ responsible for collecting PNR data from the air carriers, storing them, analysing them and transmitting the result of the analysis to the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. Its staff members may be seconded from competent public authorities.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Staff members joining the Passenger Information Units shall be cleared to have the maximum guarantees of competence and integrity for processing the PNR data collected in accordance with this Directive and may be subject to penalties provided for in Article 10a.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. In carrying out such an assessment, the Passenger Information Unit may process PNR data against pre-determined criteria defined by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action;
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. In carrying out such an assessment the Passenger Information Unit may compare PNR data against relevant databases, including international or national databases or national mirrors of Union databases, where they are established on the basis of Union law, on persons or objects sought or under alert, in accordance with Union, international and national rules applicable to such files. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action;
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) responding, on a case-by-case basis, to duly reasoned requests from competent authorities to provide PNR data and process PNR data in specific cases for the purpose of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious crime, and to provide the competent authorities with the results of such processing; and
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) analysing PNR data for the purpose of updating or creating new criteria for carrying out assessments in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime pursuant to point (a).
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2 shall be carried out in a non- discriminatory manner on the basis of assessment criteria established by its Passenger Information Unit. Member States shall ensure that the assessment criteria are set by the Passenger Information Units, in cooperation with the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. The assessment criteria shall in no circumstances be based on a person's race or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall adopt a list of the competent authorities entitled to request or receive PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data from the Passenger Information Units in order to examine that information further or take appropriate action for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences and serious crime.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities shall consist of authorities competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The PNR data of passengers and the result of the processing of PNR data received by the Passenger Information Unit may be further processed by the competent authorities of the Member States only for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating or prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. On a case-by-case basis, upon request from a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with national law, air carriers shall transfer PNR data where access earlier than that mentioned in point (a) of paragraph 2 is necessary to assist in responding to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, with regard to persons identified by a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with Article 4(2)(a) and (b), the result of the processing of PNR data is transmitted by that Passenger Information Unit to the Passenger Information Units of other Member States where the former Passenger Information Unit considers such transfer to be necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime. The Passenger Information Units of the receiving Member States shall transmit such PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data to their relevant competent authorities.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(1), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The request for such data may be based on any one or a combination of data elements, as deemed necessary by the requesting Passenger Information Unit for a specific case of prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime. Passenger Information Units shall provide the requested data as soon as practicable and shall provide also the result of the processing of PNR data, if it has already been prepared pursuant to Article 4(2)(a) and (b).
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(2), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The Passenger Information Unit may request access to specific PNR data kept by the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State in their full form without the masking out only in exceptional circumstances in response to a specific threat or a specific investigation or prosecution related to terrorist offences or serious crime.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Only in those cases where it is necessary for the prevention of an immediate and serious threat to public security may the competent authorities of a Member State request directly the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2). Such requests shall relate to a specific investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime and shall be reasoned. Passenger Information Units shall respond to such requests as a matter of priority. In all other cases the competent authorities shall channel their requests through the Passenger Information Unit of their own Member State.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Exceptionally, where early access is necessary to respond to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime, the Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State to provide it with PNR data of flights landing in or departing from the latter's territory at any time.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Upon expiry of the period of 30 days after the transfer of the PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit referred to in paragraph 1, the data shall be retained at the Passenger Information Unit for a further period of fivthree years. During this period, all data elements which could serve to identify the passenger to whom PNR data relate shall be masked out. Such anonymised PNR data shall be accessible only to a limited number of personnel of the Passenger Information Unit specifically authorised to carry out analysis of PNR data and develop assessment criteria according to Article 4(2)(d). Access to the full PNR data shall be permitted only by the Head of the Passenger Information Unit for the purposes of Article 4(2)(c) and where it could be reasonably believed that it is necessary to carry out an investigation and in response to a specific and actual threat or risk or a specific investigation or prosecution.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – indent 3
– General remarks to the extent that it contains any information which could serve to identify the passenger to whom PNR relate; andeleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The result of matching referred to in Article 4(2)(a) and (b) shall be kept by the Passenger Information Unit only as long as necessary to inform the competent authorities of a positive match. Where the result of an automated matching operation has, further to individual review by non- automated means, proven to be negative, it shall, however, be stored so as to avoid future ‘false’ positive matches for a maximum period of threone years unless the underlying data have not yet been deleted in accordance with paragraph 3 at the expiry of the fivthree years, in which case the log shall be kept until the underlying data are deleted.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10a Penalties against Passenger Information Units Member States shall ensure, in conformity with their national law, that dissuasive, effective and proportionate sanctions are provided for against Passengers Information Units which do not collect, use or transmit data in accordance with the provision of this Directive.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that air carriers, their agents or other ticket sellers for the carriage of passengers on air service inform passengers of international flights at the time of booking a flight and at the time of purchase of a ticket in a clear and precise manner about the provision of PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit, the purposes of their processing, the period of data retention, their possible use to prevent, detect, investigate or prosecute terrorist offences and serious crimetheir processing against pre- determined criteria defined by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5, the possibility of exchanging and sharing such data and their data protection rights, in particular the right to complain to a national data protection supervisory authority of their choice. The same information shall be made available by the Member States to the public.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) review the feasibility and necessity of including internal flights extending the scope of this Directive, in the light of the experience and results gained by those Member States thate collection of PNR data with regard to internal flightsand in the light of an evaluation of other EU existing tools and instruments to combat terrorism and organised crime. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council within two years after the date mentioned in Article 15(1);
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare a set of statistical information on PNR data provided to the Passenger Information Units. Such statistics shall as a minimum cover the number of identifications of any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious crime according to Article 4(2) and the number of subsequent law enforcement actions, including the resulting number of convictions, that were taken involving the use of PNR data per air carrier and destination.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare a set of statistical information on PNR data provided to the Passenger Information Units. Such statistics shall as a minimum cover the number of identifications of any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious crime according to Article 4(2) and, the number of subsequent law enforcement actions that were taken involving the use of PNR data per air carrier and destination and the number of false positive occurred while processing the PNR data concerned.
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 12
(12) General remarks (including all available information on unaccompanied minors under 18 years, such as name and gender of the minor, age, language(s) spoken, name and contact details of guardian on departure and relationship to the minor, name and contact details of guardian on arrival and relationship to the minor, departure and arrival agent)deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: LIBE